Raveniola, Zonstein, 1987
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.967.2699 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C08B8027-50CC-417E-BCD4-5183B9FF6738 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A8B723-5523-FFB0-FDBA-E03CFB3CCA11 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Raveniola |
status |
|
Raveniola View in CoL caudata species group
Diagnostic characters
Maxilla with numerous cuspules arranged in a triangular area ( Figs 202–204 View Figs 202–210 ). PMS medium-sized to large. Apical segment of PLS elongate and considerably longer than in other Raveniola spp. ( Figs 555– 558 View Figs 555–564 cf. Figs 559–618 View Figs 555–564 View Figs 565–574 View Figs 575–583 View Figs 584–592 View Figs 593–601 View Figs 602–610 View Figs 611–618 ). Males: tibiae and metatarsi I–II without modified hairs ( Figs 256, 258, 260 View Figs 256–264 , 290 View Figs 290–309 ); cymbium moderately short (as in Figs 349–351 View Figs 349–363 ); embolus broadly tipped, always with well-developed subapical keel ( Figs 379–384 View Figs 379–388 , 466–468 View Figs 466–474 ). Females: spermathecae (known only for one species of the group) very wide, each with two short, thin, and closely spaced stalks ( Figs 487–488 View Figs 487–503 ).
Species included
Raveniola caudata Zonstein, 2009 View in CoL , R. inopinata sp. nov., and R. redikorzevi ( Spassky, 1937) View in CoL .
Key to the species of the caudata View in CoL group
Males
1. Carapace and legs ginger brown or brownish orange, abdomen paler, light yellowish brown, with or without dorsal pattern ( Figs 1, 3 View Figs 1–9 ); PMS larger, basal segment of PLS 1.8–2 times as long as PMS ( Figs 555, 557 View Figs 555–564 ); embolic keel larger and higher ( Figs 379, 383 View Figs 379–388 ) ...................................................... 2
– Carapace and legs dark sepia brown, abdomen almost uniformly greyish brown (not lighter than carapace, see Fig. 2 View Figs 1–9 ); PMS smaller, basal segment of PLS 2.5 times as long as PMS ( Fig. 556 View Figs 555–564 ); embolic keel smaller and lower ( Fig. 381 View Figs 379–388 ) ......................................................... R. inopinata sp. nov.
2. Abdomen with clearly developed darker dorsal pattern ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–9 ). Copulatory bulb 2.5 times as long as wide, with proximal part of embolus less tapering ( Fig. 383 View Figs 379–388 )........... R. redikorzevi ( Spassky, 1937) View in CoL .
– Abdomen with indistinct dorsal pattern ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–9 ). Copulatory bulb 2 times as long as wide, with proximal part of embolus more tapering ( Fig. 379 View Figs 379–388 ) ................................. R. caudata Zonstein, 2009 View in CoL .
Females
Within the group, only the female of R. redikorzevi is currently known (see below).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.