Neohydatothrips magnoliae, Zhang, Hongrui, Xie, Yonghui & Li, Zhengyue, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.279973 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6170239 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887CA-FF89-FFC2-AEB9-FCE32CFEF87E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neohydatothrips magnoliae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neohydatothrips magnoliae View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs. 1–10 View FIGURES 1 – 7 View FIGURES 8 – 10 )
Female macroptera. Body strongly bicoloured ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Antennal segments I & II yellow, III–VIII brown except III & IV yellow at base ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); head dark brown but yellow at postoccipital region ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); pronotum dark brown; mesonotum pale brown; metanotum brown but sharply paler at posterior half ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); legs mainly brown, apex of tibiae paler, tarsi yellow; fore wings with pale sub-basal area then uniformly brown, base dark including clavus ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); abdominal segments I–IV brown but paler medially, V–VI yellow, VII–X dark brown; tergites II–VII with dark antecostal line ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ).
Antennae 8-segmented, segments III & IV with forked sensorium ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Head wider than long, with closely spaced transverse lines within ocellar triangle; occipital apodeme close to, but not touching, posterior margin of eyes ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); ocellar setae I present; three pairs of ocellar setae, pair III lateral to triangle; three pairs of postocular setae, median pair longest and arising postero-laterally to posterior ocelli; post-occipital region with broad band of transverse narrow reticulation ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Pronotum anterior third transversely reticulate with few internal markings; blotch transversely striate with many markings between the major lines; anterior margin of blotch straight or slightly concave medially; posterior margin of blotch straight; one pair of long major posteroangular setae; posterior margin with one pair of short setae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Mesonotum with closely spaced striations, and small lines between the major striae. Metanotum with linear reticulation, many small linear markings between the major sculpture lines, median setae situated on anterior margin, arising more distant to each other than to lateral pair ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Meso-furca with spinula, meta-furca without. Metasternal anterior margin with broad but shallow V-shaped emargination ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Fore wing first vein with setal row complete, no setae on second vein. Abdominal tergite I medially without marginal microtrichia, II–VIII with complete row of marginal microtrichia, shorter medially on II–VI ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ); tergite I with discal microtrichia laterally only, II–VIII with microtrichia extending medially near anterior margin but progressively more extensive on posterior segments ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ); tergites IX–X with no discal microtrichia ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ); sternites without discal setae, VII with three pairs of posteromarginal setae arising in front of posterior margin ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ); sternites with discal microtrichia present only laterally, II–VII with marginal microtrichia present lateral to median pair of marginal setae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ).
Measurements (holotype female in microns). Body length 1337. Head, length 260; width across eyes 184. Ocellar setae II length 23; ocellar setae III length 20; postocular setae I length 25. Pronotum, length 128; width 238. Metanotum median setae length 33. Fore wing length 990. Abdomen length 900. Antenna length 343; segments III–VIII length 63, 69, 53, 56, 12, 13.
Male macroptera. Similar to female but smaller. Abdominal sternites without pore plates ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ).
Measurements (paratype male in microns). Body length 1038. Head, length 213; width across eyes 160. Ocellar setae II length 22; ocellar setae III length 19; postocular setae I length 24. Pronotum, length 110; width 190. Metanotum median setae length 23. Fore wing length 733. Abdominal length 643. Antennal length 294; segments III–VIII length 50, 56, 43, 49, 9, 11.
Specimens examined. Holotype female, CHINA, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Arboretum, (25° 08' N, 102° 44' E, 1956 m H), from the young leaves of Parakmeria yunnanensis (Magnoliaceae) , 8.viii.2010, Xie Yong- Hui, in Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming.
Paratypes: 28 females, 16 males, collected with holotype; paratypes deposited in Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra.
Etymology. The species is named after its host plant, Magnoliaceae , a family of primitive angiosperms Magnoliales .
Comments. This new species is similar in colour and the sculpture of the mesonotum and metanotum to samayunkur (Kudo) , a species that is widespread around the world on Tagetes (Asteraceae) ( Mound & Tree, 2009) . However, it differs from samayunkur in having the fore wings dark with only the sub-basal area pale ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ), instead of three pale areas, and antennal segment V and the anterior area of the pronotum are dark. Moreover, on the head the postoccipital apodeme is closer to the compound eyes, and the ocellar region has transverse lines of sculpture instead of irregular lines. Although similar to elaeagni (Kudo) , it is distinguished from that species by the yellow abdominal segments V–VI ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ), and both anterior margin and posterior margin of the blotch are straight or slightly concave medially ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). It shares many morphological characters with trypherus (Han) , but differs from trypherus in having the anterior margin of the blotch straight or slightly concave medially ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). It is distinguished from plynopygus (Karny) since the latter has: (i) antennae 7-segmented, (ii) median pair postocular setae not long and arising behind posterior ocelli, (iii) anterior margin of blotch sharply concave medially.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |