Pyriporoides uniserialis ( Waters, 1904 )

Gordon, Dennis P. & Taylor, Paul D., 2017, Resolving the status of Pyriporoides and Daisyella (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata), with the systematics of some additional taxa of Calloporoidea having an ooecial heterozooid, Zootaxa 4242 (2), pp. 201-232 : 204-206

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4242.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88B94383-F912-4BBD-B9F0-5642002C496D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6043858

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A78782-FFA9-E470-80F4-4A9DFDEAFBA3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pyriporoides uniserialis ( Waters, 1904 )
status

 

Pyriporoides uniserialis ( Waters, 1904) View in CoL

( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 )

Membranipora uniserialis Waters, 1904: 32 , pl. 2, fig. 2.

Pyriporoides uniserialis: Hayward & Thorpe 1989: 914 View in CoL , fig. 1A; Hayward 1995: 73, fig. 64.

Material examined. Lectotype: RBINS BRY.392, RBINS, Brussels, SY Belgica Stn 570, 70.3833° S, 82.7833° W, 480 m, Bellingshausen Sea, 8 October 1898 (part of Waters’s figured material). Other material GoogleMaps : NHMUK 1995.5.23.4–5, Discovery Stn 190, off Graham Land, Palmer Archipelago, 64.9333° S, 65.5833 W, 93–130 m, 24 March 1927 GoogleMaps .

Redescription. Colony comprising encrusting uniserial runners, zooids having a cruciform budding pattern, with a lateral daughter zooid produced more or less at right angles (or shallower) from one or both of the distolateral pore-chambers, rarely from proximolateral pore-chambers (evident in some zooids), or budding is suppressed. Autozooids elongate-pyriform–claviform, with a proximally tapered portion of variable length [ZL 631–920 (805); DL 555–787 (653); CL 60–236 (152); DW 381–498 (439)], the gymnocyst proximally and laterally extensive, sloping to the substratum. Opesia and cryptocystal shelf surrounded by a raised elongate-oval cryptocystal rim that has linear granulations on the edge and inner face [CrL 307–504 (391); CrW 207–293 (257)]. Proximal cryptocystal shelf extensive, flat, evenly granular, the granules becoming a little more pustular at the edge of the opesia, the shelf attenuating distad to the opesiular constriction. Opesia about twice as long as wide, weakly dumbbell-shaped, being constricted by rounded projections that have a tubercular surface; distal (lower edge) and proximal opesial rims gently rounded, the proximal rim sometimes obliquely so [OpL 218–227 (223)]. Operculum flap-like, occupying area of opesia distal to constriction. Articulated spines perioral, six in total, more or less erect, not arching; no accessory gymnocystal spines. Ooecium hyperstomial, frontally a little longer than wide, smoothsurfaced with a short longitudinal peak that contains a small foramen [OoL 200–228 (214); OoW 225–252 (239)]; the distalmost pair of oral spines is so closely appressed to the sides of the ooecium as to leave a crease or furrow on each side when the spine is missing. Ooecial kenozooid projecting beyond ooecium, with a frontal cryptocystal area surrounding a foramen. No avicularia. Occasional kenozooids, usually roundly triangular, within the linear chains of zooids, typically (but not always) forming as a consequence of a developing zooid unable to complete its growth owing to collision with another zooid.

Remarks. Additional material discovered since the first description of the species has provided more metric data for autozooidal variation, as well as information on geographical distribution. Importantly, examination of the lectotype colony figured herein establishes the nature of the ooecium and the presence of an ooecial heterozooid. The longitudinal expression of the frontal crest of the ooecium in Waters’ (1904, pl. 2, fig. 2a) illustration shows it to be proportionally much longer than shown herein in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 D, indicating variability of this character. Also, in the lectotype colony figured here, the ooecial kenozooid seems to bear a spine ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 D). The base of the spine is not in evidence, however (or may be concealed), and the possibility cannot be ruled out that a spine from an autozooid has come to lie in this position; in the only other such heterozooid encountered ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E) there is no hint of a spine or spine base. However, one or a pair of spines is variably seen on the heterozooid in P. circularis ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C) and P. murdochi n. sp. ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 B). The heterozooid in P. uniserialis also has a lateral pair of pore-chambers.

Waters’ (1904, pl. 2, fig. 2A) depiction of the perioral spines in one zooid shows five pairs, whereas his description (ibid. p. 32) states “there are three or four spines on each side.” Hayward & Thorpe (1989) and Hayward (1995) state that there are only six such spines, confirmed by us, although one zooid in the lectotype material shows what also looks like an additional spine base in a left-proximal position ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F).

Distribution. Waters’ (1904) specimens encrusted stones and pebbles at depths of 436–480 m in the Bellingshausen Sea west of the Antarctic Peninsula. Additional material from off Graham Land, Palmer Archipelago, occurred at 93– 130 m.

RBINS

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

NHMUK

Natural History Museum, London

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Bryozoa

Class

Gymnolaemata

Order

Cheilostomatida

Family

Calloporidae

Genus

Pyriporoides

Loc

Pyriporoides uniserialis ( Waters, 1904 )

Gordon, Dennis P. & Taylor, Paul D. 2017
2017
Loc

Pyriporoides uniserialis:

Hayward 1995: 73
Hayward 1989: 914
1989
Loc

Membranipora uniserialis

Waters 1904: 32
1904
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF