Hormopeza, Zetterstedt, 1838
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.521 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40C3F1EE-5EE3-4DA8-ADE0-6D57BAC23C26 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3489100 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6B675-FFF1-FFFC-0227-D768FE6FB328 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hormopeza |
status |
|
Subfamily Ragadinae Sinclair, 2016
Figs 2 View Fig A–C, 3 View Fig , 4 View Fig A, 9 View Fig A–D
Diagnosis
The species of the subfamily Ragadidae are distinguished from those of the Iteaphilinae by the length of the postpedicel and the shape of tergite 8 in males (see the description below and the key above for details). The stout and spine-like setae on fore coxa are synapomorphies for this group. Its included species can be further distinguished by the presence of a recurved labrum in both males and females (in the Iteaphilinae, the labrum is recurved only in the females of Hormopeza ).
Type genus
Description
Postpedicel always at most two and a half times as long as broad ( Fig. 6A View Fig ). Labrum recurved in both males and females ( Fig. 6D View Fig ). Anterior of fore coxa with stout, spine like setae ( Fig. 6A View Fig ). Males: tergite 8 slender in shape ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); ventral surstylus distinguishable ( Fig. 6G View Fig ).
Comments
The first formal description of this group included the genera Dipsomyia , Hormopeza , Hydropeza , Ragas , and Zanclotus ( Sinclair 2016) . In the analysis herein, it is found that this subfamily, excluding Hormopeza , can be distinguished only by a few diagnostic characters.
Included genera
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.