Eobathynella cf. yeojuensis
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5138.5.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:434A2727-C864-4BC3-B130-0F6A3D0C5B84 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6573577 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A687A5-603E-FFC6-B8E7-D5FBFF190F84 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eobathynella cf. yeojuensis |
status |
|
Material examined. Wonju-si (37°22′ 34.1″N, 127° 51′ 15.2″E), South Korea. Collected by Chi-Woo Lee (25 March 2015). Three female specimens examined ( NNIBR 90880–90882). By our observation, no morphological differences were found between Eobathynella cf. yeojuensis specimens and E. yeojuensis . Thus, we consider that the studied specimens to correspond to E. yeojuensis . However, considering that subterranean taxa including the Parabathynellidae have many cryptic species that are difficult to distinguish based only on morphological characteristics and have been regarded as short-range endemics because of their small spatial distributions ( Guzik et al. 2008; Perina et al. 2018), we cannot be completely certain that they are the same species until compared to molecular data from E. yeojuensis collected from the type locality.
Molecular analysis. We sequenced and analyzed DNA extracted from three E. gwangjuensis sp. nov. and one Eobathynella cf. yeojuensis specimen ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). A total of 1,406 bp for 18S rDNA and 792 bp for CO1 were obtained. The intraspecific genetic distance between the three individuals of the new species ranged from 0.0 to 0.5% for CO1 and were all identical for 18S rDNA sequences. The pairwise genetic distance between the new species and Eobathynella cf. yeojuensis was 4% for 18S rDNA and 21.8–22.0% for CO1. We constructed a maximum likelihood tree for selected parabathynellid genera based on 417 bp of CO1 and 952 bp of 18S rRNA gene sequences ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |