Mitrapsylla Crawford

Rendón-Mera, Diana Isabel, Burckhardt, Daniel, Cavichioli, Rodney R. & Queiroz, Dalva L., 2020, Taxonomy and host-plant relationships of the psyllid genus Mitrapsylla (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae) in Brazil, Zootaxa 4887 (1), pp. 1-100 : 7-14

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4887.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B9A17D69-EBE7-49F4-AB01-54CA617FED02

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4338373

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A687A2-8752-FF9E-58C7-C7E0F983FCA3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mitrapsylla Crawford
status

 

Mitrapsylla Crawford View in CoL View at ENA

Mitrapsylla Crawford, 1914: 134 View in CoL ; Brown & Hodkinson, 1988: 61; Burckhardt & Queiroz, 2020: 34 View Cited Treatment .

Type species: Mitrapsylla albalineata Crawford View in CoL , by original designation.

Description and character assessment

Adult. Colouration. Body pale yellow, orange, reddish to dark brown or multi-coloured, when preserved dry or in ethanol ( Figs 103–132 View FIGURES 103–112 View FIGURES 113–122 View FIGURES 123–132 ). Antennal segments 3–8 with dark apices becoming more extended towards apex, segments 9 and 10 black. Rostrum with black tip. Forewing usually with brown median spot in cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1 apically, as well as at apex of clavus, except for M. pterogynis sp. nov., where they are lacking ( Fig. 187 View FIGURES 183–192 ), and M. pallida sp. nov., that bears a yellow spot around radular areas ( Fig. 184 View FIGURES 183–192 ). A “striped-pattern” (described below) is usually present on head and thorax, and variably on abdomen ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–22 ), except for M. pterogynis sp. nov., in which it is completely absent ( Figs 127 View FIGURES 123–132 , 157 View FIGURES 148–162 ), and M. holocalycis sp. nov. ( Figs 118 View FIGURES 113–122 , 148 View FIGURES 148–162 ), M. ochra sp. nov. ( Figs 123 View FIGURES 123–132 , 153 View FIGURES 148–162 ) and M. pallida sp. nov. ( Figs 124 View FIGURES 123–132 , 154 View FIGURES 148–162 ), where it is rather faint, and restricted to thorax in the first and last species.

Striped-pattern. Occiput light to white. Vertex with stripe present on either side of coronal suture longitudinally, along lateral margins obliquely and along posterior margin transversely; dot adjacent to lateral ocellus and on anteorbital tubercle. Anteoccipital sclerite light to white. Gena with spot laterally between antenna and eye; genal process with transversal stripe at base. Pronotum with two longitudinal stripes medially and spot on each lateral tubercle, sometimes with additional markings. Mesopraescutum with longitudinal stripe medially, along lateral margins and spot on posterior margin laterally. Mesoscutum with longitudinal stripe medially, submedially and two sublaterally, sometimes with additional markings laterally. Mesoscutellum with stripe along lateral margins, usually weak towards apex. Metascutellum with two longitudinal stripes medially. Metapostnotum with longitudinal stripe medially, usually confined to posterior half. Parapterum light to white. Mesepisternum with U-shaped marking dorsally with spot below anteriorly. Other thoracic pleurites sometimes with additional markings. Abdominal tergites with spot medially, submedially and laterally; spiracular sclerites sometimes with spot posteriorly.

Although the general arrangement is mostly stable, stripes can be just slightly lighter than general body colour, white or yellow, complete or partially interrupted, wide or narrow, relatively straight or uneven, and with or without dark outline. These variations, along with variations in body colour, occur intraspecifically and are mostly associated with the maturity of the specimens, as younger adults are lighter with faint and more expanded striped-pattern, and older specimens are darker with distinct striped-pattern. Consequently, these characters are diagnostic only to a very limited degree. The few exceptions are M. pterogynis ( Figs 127 View FIGURES 123–132 , 157 View FIGURES 148–162 ) with orange body lacking striped-pattern, M. melanothorax ( Figs 122 View FIGURES 113–122 , 152 View FIGURES 148–162 ) with dark brown head and thorax, light yellow abdomen, yellowish forewings and fine, yellowish striped-pattern, and M. holocalycis ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 113–122 , 148 View FIGURES 148–162 ) with pale yellow body, faint striped-pattern restricted to thorax and conspicuously dark veins. Variations of the striped-pattern are presented in each species colour description.

Structure. Head slightly wider than mesonotum; inclined at 30° or more from longitudinal body axis ( Figs 103–132 View FIGURES 103–112 View FIGURES 113–122 View FIGURES 123–132 ). Vertex slightly to strongly concave posteriorly, anteriorly projected and bearing poorly to well-developed longitudinal ridge on either side of coronal suture, weakly to strongly indented around foveae, with anteorbital and lateral ocellar tubercles poorly to well-developed ( Figs 133–162 View FIGURES 133–147 View FIGURES 148–162 ); covered with microscopic, sparsely spaced setae; surface microsculpture subrhomboidal. Anteoccipical sclerite developed along anterior half of eye. Gena expanded laterally, covered with short setae; genal process subconical ( Figs 134, 136, 139–141, 144, 145, 147 View FIGURES 133–147 , 157, 162 View FIGURES 148–162 ) to expanded ( Figs 133, 137, 138, 142, 143, 146 View FIGURES 133–147 , 148, 150–155, 158 View FIGURES 148–162 ), evenly ( Figs 133, 135, 137, 139, 147 View FIGURES 133–147 , 160 View FIGURES 148–162 ) or irregularly ( Figs 134, 138, 141, 142 View FIGURES 133–147 , 150, 155, 162 View FIGURES 148–162 ) narrowing towards acute ( Figs 134, 136, 141, 145 View FIGURES 133–147 , 158, 161 View FIGURES 148–162 ) to narrowly ( Figs 146 View FIGURES 133–147 , 151, 159, 160 View FIGURES 148–162 ) or broadly ( Figs 133, 137, 142 View FIGURES 133–147 , 148 View FIGURES 148–162 ) rounded apex, 0.3–0.9 times as long as vertex along midline, with dorsum slightly expanded basally, apex slightly upturned in lateral view, covered with short to long setae towards apex and two longer subapically; surface microsculpture transversely striate. Antenna 10-segmented, filiform, 1.8–4.4 times as long as head width, segments 7 or 8 always the longest; one single subapical rhinarium present on segments 4, 6, 8 and 9; terminal setae subequal or one seta about half the length of the other, slightly shorter to slightly longer than segment 10. Clypeus, in ventral view, pyriform; in lateral view, protruding anteriorly; covered with numerous short setae and two long setae medially. Labium, in lateral view, with apical segment and sometimes part of median segment visible; apical segment 0.1–0.2 times as long as head width, 0.5–0.8 times as long as median segment length, bearing long setae medially and subapically. Thorax, in lateral view, with dorsal margin weakly to strongly arched. Pronotum declivous, merging smoothly with propleurites laterally, slightly projected posterad medially, bearing three lateral tubercles; propleurites subequal, narrow, elongate, mostly concealed by eye. Forewing obovoid ( Figs 164, 167, 172 View FIGURES 163–172 , 176 View FIGURES 173–182 , 186, 191, 192 View FIGURES 183–192 ), oval ( Figs 166, 171 View FIGURES 163–172 , 177 View FIGURES 173–182 ) to subrhomboidal ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 35–37 ), rounded apically, 2.3–3.3 times as long as head width, 2.0–2.5 times as long as broad; veins bearing microscopic setae subequal or slightly longer than veins width, irregularly spaced; costal break present; pterostigma present, variously developed, lacking distinct apex; vein Cu 1a strongly arched so that cell cu 1a tall; anal break close to apex of vein Cu 1b; radular spinules forming narrow linear to subtriangular patches in cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1. Surface spinules present, sometimes much reduced, distinctly ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38–43 ), moderately ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 38–43 ) or densely ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 38–43 ) spaced forming rhomboids or densely spaced forming irregular groups separated from each other ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38–43 ), leaving spinulefree spaces along veins ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 38–43 ) or covering cells up to veins apically ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 38–43 ). Hindwing with prominent M+Cu 1 vein, costal setae distinctly grouped. Metacoxa bearing horn-shaped, pointed meracanthus; metatibia 0.5–0.9 times as long as head width, bearing distinct genual spine and 1+3+1 apical spurs. Metabasitarsus with two lateral spurs.

Male terminalia ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–11 ). Proctiger, in lateral view, with posterior lobe variously developed, straight or downcurved. Subgenital plate, in lateral view, relatively short, subglobular. Paramere, in lateral view, irregularly lamellar ( Figs 196 View FIGURES 193–201 , 205, 208 View FIGURES 202–210 , 211 View FIGURES 211–219 , 223 View FIGURES 220–228 , 238 View FIGURES 238–246 , 253 View FIGURES 247–255 , 256, 262 View FIGURES 256–264 , 265 View FIGURES 265–273 , 280 View FIGURES 274–282 ), sublanceolate ( Fig. 274 View FIGURES 274–282 ), weakly ( Figs 202 View FIGURES 202–210 , 214, 217 View FIGURES 211–219 , 229, 232 View FIGURES 229–237 ) to strongly clavate ( Figs 199 View FIGURES 193–201 , 220 View FIGURES 220–228 , 235 View FIGURES 229–237 , 244 View FIGURES 238–246 , 271 View FIGURES 265–273 , 277 View FIGURES 274–282 ), or capitate ( Fig. 241 View FIGURES 238–246 ); apex with sclerotised ridge; outer surface covered with long setae mostly in apical two thirds, longer and more densely spaced along posterior margin; inner surface mostly covered with short to long setae, usually longer basally and along posterior margin, often with row of thick setae along apical anterior margin, several thick setae below sclerotised ridge, and group of thick ( Figs 197 View FIGURES 193–201 , 206 View FIGURES 202–210 , 266 View FIGURES 265–273 ) or stout ( Figs 194 View FIGURES 193–201 , 221 View FIGURES 220–228 , 242 View FIGURES 238–246 , 248 View FIGURES 247–255 , 260 View FIGURES 256–264 ) setae on apical posterior margin; in dorsal view, sclerotised ridge differently developed, usually bearing posterior tooth. Aedeagus simple ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–11 ) or complex unipartite ( Figs 8, 9 View FIGURES 5–11 ) or tripartite ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 5–11 ) (described below); end tube of the ejaculatory duct weakly curved; sperm pump with narrow barrel and large end-plates.

Simple aedeagus. The aedeagal head, that bears the end tube of the ejaculatory duct, consists of the single expansion following the aedeagal stem ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–11 ; Brown & Hodkinson 1988, p. 12, Fig. E).

Complex aedeagus. The aedeagal head is modified into two structures that follow the aedeagal stem: 1) the dorsal lobe, which bears the end tube of the ejaculatory duct; and 2) the ventral process, which is expanded apically and bears two subapical tubercles on either side ( Figs 8–11 View FIGURES 5–11 ). This type of aedeagus is divided into two subtypes based on the condition of the dorsal lobe, which can be unipartite, in which the dorsal lobe consists of one single lobe, without subdivisions ( Figs 8, 9 View FIGURES 5–11 ); or tripartite, in which the dorsal lobe is divided in three lobules ( Fig. 10, 11 View FIGURES 5–11 ): one median lobule that bears the end tube of the ejaculatory duct, and two lateral lobules; and basally bears the membranous pouch ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 5–11 ).

Female terminalia ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–11 ). Proctiger, in lateral view, cuneate; dorsal outline slightly to strongly concave distal to circumanal ring, apical extension straight ( Figs 315, 318 View FIGURES 313–318 , 328 View FIGURES 325–330 , 333, 340, 342) or sinuous ( Figs 314 View FIGURES 313–318 , 324 View FIGURES 319–324 , 326, 330 View FIGURES 325–330 , 341 View FIGURES 337–342 ); covered with peg-setae, with longitudinal row of dorsomedial long setae along each side; apex straight ( Figs 318 View FIGURES 313–318 , 333, 340) to strongly upturned ( Figs 320, 323 View FIGURES 319–324 , 325 View FIGURES 325–330 , 332, 338); rounded ( Figs 318 View FIGURES 313–318 , 324 View FIGURES 319–324 , 333, 335, 337, 340) or obliquely ( Figs 313, 317 View FIGURES 313–318 , 321 View FIGURES 319–324 , 326 View FIGURES 325–330 , 332, 335, 342) or transversally truncate (Figs 332, 341). Circumanal ring double. Subgenital plate, in lateral view, cuneate; apex truncate ( Figs 320 View FIGURES 319–324 , 331, 338, 340) or well-developed ( Figs 313, 316 View FIGURES 313–318 , 321 View FIGURES 319–324 , 330 View FIGURES 325–330 , 335, 337, 342); ventral outline almost straight ( Figs 323 View FIGURES 319–324 , 325, 330 View FIGURES 325–330 , 335) or slightly sinuous ( Figs 314, 316 View FIGURES 313–318 , 321 View FIGURES 319–324 ), convex ( Figs 316, 318 View FIGURES 313–318 , 328 View FIGURES 325–330 ) to strongly expanded ( Figs 319, 322 View FIGURES 319–324 , 326 View FIGURES 325–330 , 336, 337, 339, 340, 341); covered with short to long setae in median third and ventrally throughout, short setae in apical third and long setae at apex, with or without group of long setae on dorsum subapically, with or without seta-free patch subapically; in ventral view, lateral margins abruptly ( Figs 345, 348, 350, 354, 361 View FIGURES 343–362 , 368 View FIGURES 363–372 ), strongly ( Figs 343, 347, 356 View FIGURES 343–362 , 364, 367, 371 View FIGURES 363–372 ) or weakly ( Figs 344, 357, 362 View FIGURES 343–362 , 370, 372 View FIGURES 363–372 ) narrowing towards rounded ( Figs 344, 356, 359 View FIGURES 343–362 , 366, 369, 372 View FIGURES 363–372 ), subtruncate ( Figs 343, 346, 351, 362 View FIGURES 343–362 , 370 View FIGURES 363–372 ) or truncate ( Figs 348, 350 View FIGURES 343–362 ) apex.

Immature. Descriptions by Burckhardt & Brown (1992) and Burckhardt & Queiroz (2020).

Comments. Mitrapsylla is morphologically relatively homogeneous and differences between species are often confined to the male terminalia. Many characters vary within a species (e.g. shape of genal process, forewing and apex of female proctiger, arching of dorsal margin of thorax and degree of head inclination from longitudinal body axis), extremes are linked by intermediate forms (e.g. length of antenna and genal process), and some are influenced by the specimen coloration, age and preservation (e.g. degree of development of longitudinal ridge of vertex, and anteorbital and lateral ocellar tubercles). Spacing and distribution of surface spinules are sometimes useful for species definition. Characters of females such as the shape of apex of subgenital plate in lateral and ventral view, and the presence or absence of group of setae and seta-free patch on subgenital plate subapically, were useful for the delimitation of some species. Characters with greater value for species identification are principally the paramere shape and, to a lesser extent, the type of aedeagus and details of the shape of the aedeagus and the apical sclerotised ridge. As the taxonomy relies largely on differences in the male terminalia, females and immatures are often difficult to assign with certitude to a particular species. For this reason, we provide here an identification key only for the males.

Prior to this study, Mitrapsylla contained 24 valid species ( Crawford 1914; Šulc 1914; Crawford 1925; Caldwell 1944; Caldwell & Martorell 1952; White & Hodkinson 1980; Brown & Hodkinson 1988; Burckhardt & Queiroz 2020). Here, we describe 27 new species from Brazil associated with various genera of legumes. Material at hand of additional species, too incomplete for description, suggests that many more Mitrapsylla species can be expected.

Host-plants are confirmed by the presence of immatures for 25 species and are likely for 11 species. For 15 species no host information is available.

Key to Mitrapsylla View in CoL males

1. Head and thorax medium to dark brown, strongly contrasting from whitish to light yellow abdomen and yellowish forewings; striped-pattern very fine or present as scattered spots ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 12–22 , 23 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, lamellar; apex rounded or squarish, directed posteriorly ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 44–68 ). On Machaerium View in CoL spp.......................................... M. melanothorax

- Combination of characters different....................................................................... 2

2. Body light yellowish-orange to orange, lacking distinct striped-pattern ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 12–22 , 24 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Forewing lacking brown median spot in cells apically ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 35–37 ); surface spinules fully covering all cells covering cells up to veins ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 38–43 ). Paramere, in lateral view, lamellar; anterior and posterior margins subparallel; apex squarish, with posterior half expanded dorsally, displaced from plane of anterior half ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 44–68 ). On Pterogyne nitens ................................................... M. pterogynis

- Combination of characters different....................................................................... 3

3. Body pale yellow, contrasting from conspicuously dark veins ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 12–22 , 25 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, lamellar; apex with prominent median projection; posterior margin expanded posteriorly in basal third ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Aedeagus with dorsal lobe almost as long as ventral process; ventral process with apical expansion weak, considerably smaller than dorsal lobe ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 44–68 ). On Holocalyx balansae View in CoL ........................................................................ M. holocalycis

- Combination of characters different....................................................................... 4

4. Aedeagus simple ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–11 ; Burckhardt & Queiroz 2020: Figs 139, 141, 143, 145, 147 View FIGURES 133–147 , 149, 150, 152, 154, 156 View FIGURES 148–162 )............ 5

- Aedeagus complex ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 5–11 ‾11)......................................................................... 15

5. Paramere, in lateral view, clavate or capitate ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–22 )........................................................ 6

- Paramere, in lateral view, lamellar or irregularly lamellar...................................................... 7

6. GL/VL Ż 0.7. Paramere, in lateral view, clavate. Aedeagus, in lateral view, lacking subapical hook.............. M. viridis

- GL/VL Ľ 0.6. Paramere, in lateral view, capitate ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Aedeagus, in lateral view, with subapical hook ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 44–68 )................................................................................................. M. itacoatiara

7. Forewing slightly angular near apex of vein Rs.............................................................. 8

- Forewing evenly rounded near apex of vein Rs............................................................. 10

8. Forewing with dark subapical band. Aedeagal head, in lateral view, only weakly expanded apically............ M. compta

- Forewing without dark subapical band, usually with dark marginal spots in the middle of cells. Aedeagal head, in lateral view, strongly expanded apically with a subapical tooth. On Copaifera View in CoL spp............................................. 9

9. Forewing membrane infuscate in addition to brown patches along wing margin. Paramere, in lateral view, with slightly angular posterior margin in apical third. On Copaifera oblongifolia View in CoL ........................................ M. fumipennis

- Forewing membrane colourless apart from brown patches along wing margin. Paramere, in lateral view, more or less evenly tapering to blunt apex in apical half. On Copaifera langsdorffii View in CoL ...................................... M. copaiferae

10. Paramere, in lateral view, irregularly lamellar, posterior margin with each an apical and basal projection ( Brown & Hodkinson 1988: 78, Fig. 34G View FIGURES 23–34 )........................................................................ M. longicauda View in CoL

- Paramere, in lateral view, evenly lamellar, posterior margin lacking projections................................... 11

11. Body dimensions larger: antenna length> 2.0 mm, forewing length> 2.0 mm. Paramere, in lateral view, with slightly narrow apex............................................................................................... 12

- Body dimensions smaller: antenna length <1.9 mm, forewing length <2.0 mm. Paramere, in lateral view, with wide apex. 13

12. GL/VL 0.7–0.9. AL> 2.6 mm, FL> 2.4 mm. Paramere, in dorsal view, with sclerotised apex hook-shaped, forward directed. Aedeagus, in lateral view, with two large subapical spines. On Copaifera langsdorffii View in CoL ....................... M. adusta

- GL/VL 0.5–0.7. AL <2.5 mm, FL <2.5 mm. Paramere, in dorsal view, with sclerotised apex truncate with slightly larger anterior and smaller posterior point. Aedeagus, in lateral view, lacking subapical spines......................... M. repens

13. Paramere, in lateral view, strongly rounded apically; inner surface lacking a group of dense bristles along posterior margin near apex. Aedeagus, in lateral view, hardly expanded apically.......................................... M. megacerca

- Paramere different; inner surface with a group of dense bristles along posterior margin near apex. Aedeagus, in lateral view, strongly expanded apically............................................................................. 14

14. Paramere, in lateral view, weakly expanded apically. Aedeagus, in lateral view, with apical expansion about one third length of distal segment................................................................................ M. borealis

- Paramere, in lateral view, strongly expanded apically. Aedeagus, in lateral view, with apical expansion about half length of distal segment. On Copaifera View in CoL spp................................................................ .. M. gloriae

15. Paramere, in lateral view, sublanceolate ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 69–92 )................................................... M. truncata

- Paramere different................................................................................... 16

16. Paramere, in lateral view, clavate (distinctly widening towards apex) ( Figs 50 View FIGURES 44–68 ‾53, 55, 56, 58‾61, 63‾75).............. 17

- Paramere, in lateral view, lamellar or irregularly lamellar lamellar (not or hardly widening towards apex) ( Figs 77, 79, 81, 83 View FIGURES 69–92 ‾85, 87, 89, 91).................................................................................... 32

17. Forewing with dark brown median spot in cell r 2 apically ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ). Paramere, in lateral view, clavate; apex deeply indented in anterior half, forming prominent hook in posterior half ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 44–68 ). On Machaerium amplum ................... M. hamata

- Forewing lacking dark brown median spot apically in cell r 2 ( Figs 35, 37 View FIGURES 35–37 ). Paramere different........................ 18

18. Paramere, in lateral view, mitten-shaped, with anterior half strongly expanded dorsally and posterior half deeply concave, expanded posteriorly ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 44–68 ).................................................................. M. securigera

- Paramere different................................................................................... 19

19. Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin forming a small lobe in apical third ( Figs 52, 53, 55, 56 View FIGURES 44–68 , arrow)......... 20

- Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin not forming a lobe, at most slightly angulated in apical third............ 21

20. Paramere inner surface, in lateral view, bearing group of stout setae on apical posterior margin ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Aedeagus, in lateral view, with membranous pouch elongate; ventral process oval ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 44–68 ).............................. M. domahovskii

- Paramere inner face, in lateral view, lacking group of stout setae on apical posterior margin ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Aedeagus, in lateral view, with membranous pouch small; ventral process oblong-oval ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 44–68 ).................................. M. halbertae

21. Paramere, in lateral view, with both margins moderately and gradually expanding towards apex ( Figs 58, 59 View FIGURES 44–68 ); apex irregularly oblique, with subposterior and posterior sclerotised ridge, the former in lower level than the latter ( Figs 59 View FIGURES 44–68 , 93 View FIGURES 93–102 ). On Machaerium hirtum ............................................................................. M. machaerii

- Paramere different................................................................................... 22

22. Head and thorax multi-coloured ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 12–22 ). Paramere, in lateral view, weakly expanded apically ( Figs 60, 61 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Aedeagus tripartite ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 44–68 )............................................................................. M. clavata

- Head and thorax pale yellow, orange, reddish to brownish ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 12–22 ‾19), sometimes multi-coloured ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 12–22 ). Paramere, in lateral view, weakly to strongly expanded apically ( Figs 63 View FIGURES 44–68 ‾75). Aedeagus unipartite ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 5–11 ‾9)..................... 23

23. Paramere, in lateral view, strongly expanded apically; apical expansion relatively symmetrical; with sclerotised ridge posteriorly ( Figs 63 View FIGURES 44–68 ‾68).................................................................................... 24

- Paramere, in lateral view, weakly or moderately expanded apically; apical expansion asymmetrical; with sclerotised ridge medially or subposteriorly ( Figs 69 View FIGURES 69–92 ‾75)..................................................................... 28

24. Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin indented along median third; with sclerotised ridge in posterior third ( Figs 63, 64 View FIGURES 44–68 ). On Andira fraxinifolia View in CoL ..................................................................... M. andirae

- Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin lacking such indention, at most concave subapically; with sclerotised ridge in about posterior half ( Figs 65 View FIGURES 44–68 ‾68)........................................................................ 25

25. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex irregularly straight, anterior margin never expanded dorsally ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Surface spinules fully covering cells r 1, r 2, m 1, m 2, cu 1 and cu 2. On Sophora tomentosa View in CoL .................................. M. itaparica View in CoL

- Paramere, in lateral view, with apex slightly or strongly indented; anterior margin weakly or strongly expanded dorsally ( Figs 66 View FIGURES 44–68 ‾68). Surface spinules not fully covering fully covering cells r 1, r 2, m 1, m 2, cu 1 and cu 2 ........................... 26

26. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex slightly indented submedially; anterior margin weakly expanded dorsally ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Surface spinules restricted to radular areas in cells m 1, m 2, and cu 1, sometimes much reduced......................... M. soror

- Paramere, in lateral view, with apex strongly indented in anterior third; anterior margin strongly expanded dorsally ( Figs 67, 68 View FIGURES 44–68 ). Surface spinules fully covering cells m 1, m 2, and cu 1, sometimes restricted to radular areas cells m 1, m 2, and cu 1 ...... 27

27. Paramere, in dorsal view, with sclerotised ridge smoothly inward directed, separated from posterior tooth by deep indention ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 93–102 ). On Andira cujabensis View in CoL ............................................................... M. cujabensis View in CoL

- Paramere, in dorsal view, with sclerotised ridge slightly sinuous, not separated from posterior tooth by deep indention ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 93–102 ). On Machaerium villosum ........................................................................ M. villosi

28. Head and thorax usually multi-coloured, ventrally darker ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 12–22 , 26 View FIGURES 23–34 ). AL Ż 1.4 mm. Forewing with radular spines present in cell r 2, sometimes inconspicuous ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 35–37 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin rounded in apical third; sclerotised ridge subposteriorly ( Figs 69, 70 View FIGURES 69–92 ). On Periandra mediterranea View in CoL ...................................... M. periandrae

- Head and thorax pale yellow, orange, reddish to brownish ( Figs 27 View FIGURES 23–34 ‾29). AL Ľ 1.3 mm. Forewing with radular spinules some- times present in r 2 but inconspicuous. Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin angulate in apical third; sclerotised ridge medially ( Figs 71 View FIGURES 69–92 ‾75)................................................................................ 29

29. Surface spinules densely spaced, forming irregular groups somewhat separated from each other ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38–43 ), seldom moderately spaced ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 38–43 ); fully covering all cells. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex squarish, strongly directed posteriorly ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, with sclerotised ridge prominent ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 93–102 )............................................. M. aurantia

- Surface spinules distinctly ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38–43 ) to moderately spaced ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 38–43 ); present around radular areas of cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1, sometimes much reduced. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex irregularly rounded to subtruncate, slightly to strongly directed posteriorly ( Figs 74, 75 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, different ( Figs 96, 98, 99 View FIGURES 93–102 )............................................. 30

30. Genal process, in dorsal view, expanded; with broadly or narrowly rounded apex ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with anterior margin almost straight in median two quarters, somewhat abruptly curving towards apex ( Fig. 71, 72 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, with sclerotised ridge irregularly inward directed ( Fig. 96 View FIGURES 93–102 ). On Aeschynomene paniculata View in CoL ............. M. aeschynomenis

- Genal process, in dorsal view, subconical, rarely expanded; with subacute or acute apex, rarely rounded ( Figs 28, 29 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with anterior margin weakly to strongly sinuous ( Figs 74, 75 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, with sclerotised ridge irregularly straight or subrectangular ( Figs 98, 99 View FIGURES 93–102 )........................................................... 31

31. Paramere, in lateral view, with anterior margin broadly rounded in apical third; apex irregularly rounded to subtruncate, slightly to strongly directed posteriorly ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Surface spinules absent or much reduced around radular areas of cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1. On Desmodium album View in CoL ......................................................................... M. didyma

- Paramere, in lateral view, with anterior margin weakly rounded in apical third; apex subtruncate, slightly directed posteriorly ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Surface spinules around radular areas of cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1, sometimes much reduced. On Desmodium adscendens View in CoL .................................................................................... M. cubana View in CoL

32. Ventral process of the aedeagus, in lateral view, with apical expansion smaller than dorsal lobe ( Figs 78, 80, 82 View FIGURES 69–92 )......... 33

- Ventral process of the aedeagus, in lateral view, with apical expansion subequal or larger than dorsal lobe ( Figs 86, 88, 90, 92 View FIGURES 69–92 )................................................................................................ 35

33. Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin strongly indented along apical third; apex squarish, following the longitudinal paramere axis ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Aedeagus unipartite ( Fig. 8, 9 View FIGURES 5–11 , 82 View FIGURES 69–92 )......................................... M. pterodontis

- Paramere different. Aedeagus tripartite ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 5–11 , 78, 80 View FIGURES 69–92 )................................................... 34

34. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex slightly directed posteriorly, irregularly rounded, slightly notched medially; anterior margin convex in apical two thirds; posterior margin subequally expanded in apical third and basal two thirds ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, bearing large posterior tooth, slightly directed anteriorly ( Fig. 100 View FIGURES 93–102 ). On Machaerium View in CoL sp.............. M. brevigenis

- Paramere, in lateral view, with apex strongly directed posteriorly, truncate, never notched; anterior margin almost straight before apex; posterior margin strongly concave along apical half ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, with wavy sclerotised ridge and blunt posterior tooth, the former in lower level than the latter ( Fig. 101 View FIGURES 93–102 ).................................. M. ceplaciensis View in CoL

35. Paramere, in lateral view, with anterior and posterior margins subparallel; apex truncate ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 69–92 ); in dorsal view, sclerotised ridge bearing small anterior, median and posterior tooth ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 93–102 )....................................... M. ochra

- Paramere different................................................................................... 36

36. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex following the longitudinal paramere axis, rather straight (84, 85, 87)............... 37

- Paramere, in lateral view, with apex weakly to strongly deflected from longitudinal paramere axis, directed posteriorly ( Figs 89, 91 View FIGURES 69–92 )................................................................................................ 39

37. Genal process, in dorsal view, with apex acute ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 23–34 ); GL/VL Ľ 0.4. AL/HW Ľ 2.1. Surface spinules much reduced around radular areas of cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex subtruncate ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 69–92 )............. M. amazonica

- Genal process, in dorsal view, with apex narrowly rounded or subacute ( Figs 31, 32 View FIGURES 23–34 ); GL/VL Ż 0.5. AL/HW Ż 2.5. Surface spinules fully covering cells r 1, r 2, m 1, m 2, cu 1 and cu 2. Paramere, in lateral view, with apex irregularly rounded ( Figs 85, 87 View FIGURES 69–92 ). .................................................................................................. 38

38. Genal process, in dorsal view, subconical with subacute apex ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with posterior margin weakly wavy ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Aedeagus unipartite ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 69–92 )................................................... M. xanthoptera

- Genal process, in dorsal view, expanded, with apex subacute or narrowly rounded ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, expanded in apical and two basal thirds ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Aedeagus tripartite ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 69–92 ). On Cassia leptophylla View in CoL .................. M. cassiae

39. Head and thorax yellowish-brown to ochreous, body usually darker ventrally; with striped-pattern ( Figs 21 View FIGURES 12–22 , 33 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with apex strongly rounded ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Surface spinules absent or much reduced around radular areas of cells m 1, m 2 and cu 1; leaving spinule-free spaces along veins ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 38–43 ). Aedeagus tripartite ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 69–92 ). On Machaerium View in CoL spp.................................................................................................... M. cuspidata

- Head and thorax light straw-coloured, body ventrally concolorous; lacking distinct striped-pattern ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 12–22 , 34 View FIGURES 23–34 ). Paramere, in lateral view, with apex slightly notched anteriorly ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 69–92 ). Surface spinules fully covering all cells; covering cells up to veins apically ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 38–43 ). Aedeagus unipartite ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 69–92 ). On Pterodon emarginatus View in CoL ............................... M. pallida

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Psyllidae

Loc

Mitrapsylla Crawford

Rendón-Mera, Diana Isabel, Burckhardt, Daniel, Cavichioli, Rodney R. & Queiroz, Dalva L. 2020
2020
Loc

Mitrapsylla

Burckhardt, D. & Queiroz, D. L. 2020: 34
Brown, R. G. & Hodkinson, I. D. 1988: 61
Crawford, D. L. 1914: 134
1914
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF