Tupirinna trilineata ( Chickering, 1937 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5004.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60817167-2232-43BB-825D-B2DA67BD54D0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5123480 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487D6-BA28-705B-8CEE-69BAFDA8CA64 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tupirinna trilineata ( Chickering, 1937 ) |
status |
|
Tupirinna trilineata ( Chickering, 1937) View in CoL
Parachemmis trilineatus Chickering, 1937: 41 , plate 2, figs 28, 31, 35, 38, plate 4, figs 49, 51 (♂ holotype from Barro Colorado Island , Zona do Canal , Panama, 1934, leg. A.M. Chickering, in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard [MCZ]; paratypes 3♀, 16.VI–15.VIII.1934, leg. A.M. Chickering, MCZ, not re-examined).
Tupirinna trilineata Bonaldo, 2000: 134 View in CoL , figs 344–347.
Emended diagnosis. Males of Tupirinna trilineata differ from those of other species with an embolar process dorsal to the embolus and the dorsal lobe of RTA represented by a small retro-apical hump ( T. palmares sp. nov. and T. ibiapaba sp. nov.) by the combined presence of a long, filiform embolus, ATV longer than wide, and by the presence of a tegular retroapical projection. Females resemble those of T. ibiapaba sp. nov. by the incomplete, recurved margins of the copulatory opening, differing by the sub-quadrangular copulatory pouch ( Bonaldo 2000: figs 344–347).
Description. See Bonaldo, 2000: 134–136.
Distribution. Panama ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tupirinna trilineata ( Chickering, 1937 )
Xavier, Cláudia & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2021 |
Tupirinna trilineata
Bonaldo, A. B. 2000: 134 |
Parachemmis trilineatus
Chickering, A. M. 1937: 41 |