Securiops, : Kluge, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB852CA9-6C6E-4016-9972-AAF2C378E41F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8335763 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487CE-FFE0-FFCD-85A5-562C6EE1FC38 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Securiops |
status |
|
Status of Securiops View in CoL View at ENA .
Kaltenbach et al. (2023) treated Securiops as a genus but not as a subgenus, reporting the following its characters as generic ones: ́(1) labium with strongly reduced glossae, enlarged paraglossae, and very broad, hatchet-like palps; (2) tergalii I–IV with two lamellae; (3) legs elongate, with relatively few short setae on dorsal and ventral margins; (4) claws very elongate, without denticles; and (5) lateral margins of posterior abdominal segments with sharp spines». Actually, only the first of these characters constitutes autapomorphy of the subgenus Securiops , while the characters (2)–(5) are diagnostic for the taxon Cloeon /fg1, to which the subgenus Securiops belongs. The regular lateral row of greatly enlarged spines on distal part of cercus ( Figs 71–72 View FIGURES 70–76 , 105 View FIGURES 98–105 , 124–125 View FIGURES 120–125 ) is the most important diagnostic character of Procloeon s. l., to which the subgenus Securiops belongs.
Distribution. Paleotropical (Afrotropical and Oriental Regions).
Species composition. Afrotropical species: Procloeon (Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947) comb. n.; P. (S.) macafertiorum (Lugo-Ortiz in Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty 1996); P. (S.) mandrare ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.; P. (S.) megapalpus ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.; P. (S.) mutadens ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.. Oriental species: Procloeon (Securiops) primasia ( Kaltenbach et al. 2023) comb. n.
Key to larvae (the number in parentheses refers to the antithesis)
1(4) Hind protoptera present ( Figs 29 View FIGURES 25–30 , 67 View FIGURES 66–69 ) (can be poorly visible, since cuticle of hind protopteron is colorless)............... 2
2(3) Abdominal terga IV–X with numerous scales ( Figs 55–56 View FIGURES 53–58 ); terga IV and VII without medial longitudinal stripe ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–30 )........................................................................................... P. (S.) falcatum
3(2) All abdominal terga without scales, with numerous denticles ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 70–76 ); terga IV–V and VII–IX with contrasting medial longitudinal stripe on light background ( Figs 66, 69 View FIGURES 66–69 )........................................ P. (S.) macafertiorum
4(1) Hind protoptera absent ( Fig. 108, 111 View FIGURES 106–115 ) or represented by short vestiges ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 98–105 ).
5(6) Spines on lateral side of cercus sharply differentiated: in proximal portion of cercus all spines stout, conic and not longer than next cercomere; in distal portion of cercus all spines delicate, widened from base, as long as 2–3 next cercomeres ( Figs 124–125 View FIGURES 120–125 ). Tergalii with apex stretched and pointed, resembling linden leaf ( Figs 18–24 View FIGURES 1–24 )................. P. (S.) primasia
6(5) Spines on lateral side of cercus gradually change from shorter in proximal part of cercus to longer in its distal part ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 98–105 ). Tergalii with apex rounded ( Gillies 1988: figs 14–19)..................................................................................................... P. (S.) mutadens ; possibly, also (S.) mandrare View in CoL and P. (S.) megapalpus View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |