Cocconeis tsara Riaux-Gobin, Witkowski & Bemiasa, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.484.2.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6494509 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3FE26-0454-4F68-FF2C-E29505807631 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Cocconeis tsara Riaux-Gobin, Witkowski & Bemiasa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cocconeis tsara Riaux-Gobin, Witkowski & Bemiasa sp. nov. LM Figs 1–8 View FIGURES 1–8 ; SEM Figs 9–29 View FIGURES 9–12 View FIGURES 13–17 View FIGURES 18–25 View FIGURES 26–29
Description: Valve small, elliptic. Valve length 11–19 µm (mean 16 µm ± 1.5); valve width 7–12 µm (mean 10 µm ± 1.1); L/ W 1.7 ± 0.2; n = 64 (SEM). SV: convex, striae radiate and regularly spaced, uniseriate comprised of subround to square subdivided areolae with rounded corners ( Figs 9–12 View FIGURES 9–12 ) becoming multiseriate on the valve margin (up to triseriate with alternate areolae, Figs 9, 12 View FIGURES 9–12 ) comprised of smaller undivided areolae. SV striae 13–17 in 10 µm (mean 14 µm ± 1.0). SV areolae appear round-elliptic in phase-contrast ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ), while squared in Nomarski differential interference-contrast ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Externally, hymenes of areolae nearly level with valve surface ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 9–12 ). Areolae open internally by a sub-round to elliptic aperture giving access to a loculate areola ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13–17 ). In internal view, one thin bar (up to two) axially arranged (= primary bar/s), merges with one bar transapically oriented on the bottom of the small chamber (= secondary bar), resulting in an irregular to asymetrical cross ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 9–12 , 17 View FIGURES 13–17 , 63 View FIGURES 61–69 ). Exceptionally, presence of diamond-like structure (more or less irregular or incomplete) on rare marginal loculate areolae ( Figs 12–13 View FIGURES 9–12 View FIGURES 13–17 ). All sectors of loculate areolae externally closed by hymenes with short slits perpendicular to the frame of each sector ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 9–12 ). SVVC strong and closed, ornamented by digitate fimbriae with irregular apex ( Figs 14, 16 View FIGURES 13–17 ). SVVC fimbria present on each virga, or more rarely, on each three to four virgae ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13–17 ). Narrow cingulum composed of few cingular bands/copulae. RV: Slightly concave, with a marginal hyaline rim, striae uniseriate up to the margin ( Figs 18–22 View FIGURES 18–25 ). RV striae 18–25 in 10 µm (mean 20 µm ± 1.6), composed of regularly spaced round areolae. No RV areolae on apices. Central area reduced, external proximal raphe endings closely spaced, straight, slightly expanded ( Figs 23–25 View FIGURES 18–25 ), terminal raphe endings simple, far from margin ( Figs 20–22 View FIGURES 18–25 ). RV areolae externally closed by slightly concave hymenes with short slits perpendicular to the frame of the areolae. RVVC open, with hammer-like fimbriae taking place on an elevated-raised rim, each two to three virgae ( Figs 27–28 View FIGURES 26–29 ). Between each large fimbria, an undulation, reminiscent a vestigial fimbria, faces each virga ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 26–29 , arrowheads). Each fimbria ornamented on its abvalvar side by an oblong and smooth papilla (no furrows, Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26–29 ). Second RV copula with a ligula.
Holotype, here assigned: Slide BM 101 951 ( NHM) from the sample 17– ANAK.
Isotypes: Slides mounted with the same material as the holotype sample 17– ANAK: slide SZCZ 26006 in A. Witkowski collection ( The Faculty of Geosciences , Szczecin, Poland) and slide 17– ANAK in C. Riaux-Gobin collection ( CRIOBE – CNRS, USR 3278 , Perpignan, France) .
Type locality: Coral reef on the Western coast of Anakao ( Madagascar, Indian Ocean), sample 17– ANAK ( Table 1).
Etymology: The specific epithet ‘ tsara ’ refers to the Malagasy word meaning beautiful.
Habitat: Epiphyte on Bleakeleya cf. notata (Grunow in Van Heurck) Round, living on macroalgae from a coral reef environment composed of diverse living corals.
Remarks: Cocconeis tsara sp. nov. is most similar to C. scutellum var. posidoniae De Stefano, D.Marino & Mazzella ( De Stefano et al. 2000, 2008). The two taxa can be distinguished by differences in frustule ultrastructure. Cocconeis scutellum var. posidoniae has SV areolae subdivided into two hymenate, and axially arranged, reniform structures (figs 75, 77– 78 in De Stefano et al. 2000), sometimes showing a central ‘pierced’ structure (fig. 79 in De Stefano et al. 2000). In contrast, the SV areolae of C. tsara are cruciately or near-cruciately divided by thin crossbars, irregular or distorted ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 9–12 , 63 View FIGURES 61–69 ) and the hymenate sectors are triangular, with rounded edges on the areola perimeter ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 9–12 , 17 View FIGURES 13–17 ). The RVVC of C. scutellum var. posidoniae is closed (fig. 83 in De Stefano et al. 2000) while that of C. tsara sp. nov. is open ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–25 ). The RVVC fimbriae of C. scutellum var. posidoniae are joined at their terminus forming large quadrangular fenestrae (figs 76, 83, 85 in De Stefano et al. 2000) while the fimbriae of C. tsara are free on the interior edge ( Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26–29 ), and ending by a spathulate or hammer-like structure ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26–29 arrows). The RV striation is marginally biseriate in C. scutellum var. posidoniae (figs 82, 86 in De Stefano et al. 2000) while uniseriate in C. tsara ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 18–25 , 26 View FIGURES 26–29 ). The papillae on the RVVC fimbriae in C. scutellum var. posidoniae are ornamented by numerous furrows, while the papillae are smooth and rod-like in C. tsara ( Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26–29 ).
Valves slightly smaller and more elongate than C. tsara sp. nov. were found as epizoic on ‘Océane’ (juvenile Chelonia mydas Linnaeus, Haapiti, Moorea , South Pacific, Figs 30–33 View FIGURES 30–33 ) [valve length 10–11 µm (mean 11 µm ± 0.6); valve width 4–6 µm (mean 5.4 µm ± 0.5); L/W 2 ± 0.2; n = 12. SV striae 18–21 in 10 µm (mean 19 µm ± 1.4)]. Cocconeis cf. tsara has a similar SV loculate areola arrangement, but the areolae are sometimes further divided by additional cross-bars forming a zig-zag or arborescent arrangement of the hymenate sectors ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–33 ). No RV was associated with certainty to the latter taxon (only two RV observed, with dense striation, that may as well pertain to Cocconeis coronatoides Riaux-Gobin & O.E.Romero , in Riaux-Gobin et al. (2011a: 88), which was also present in the sample in rare abundance). A vestigial raphe was also present on the SV ( Figs 30–31 View FIGURES 30–33 , circles).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |