Stedocys Ono, 1995

Labarque, Facundo M., Grismado, Cristian J., Ramírez, Martín J., Yan, Hengmei & Griswold, Charles E., 2009, The Southeast Asian genus Stedocys Ono, 1995 (Araneae: Scytodidae): first descriptions of female genitalia and a new species from China, Zootaxa 2297, pp. 1-14 : 2-3

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.191616

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6218604

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3F934-8A61-BF2A-F0BD-FC8FE3ECFD81

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Stedocys Ono, 1995
status

 

Genus Stedocys Ono, 1995 View in CoL View at ENA

Stedocys Ono 1995: 132 View in CoL . Type species by original designation: Stedocys uenorum Ono, 1995 View in CoL . Platnick 2009.

Diagnosis. Males of Stedocys are distinguished from those of the other genera of Scytodidae by having the papal tarsus subequal or smaller than the tegulum, not prolonged apically, without prolateral blunt macrosetae; the tegulum long, inserted apically on the tarsus; embolus slightly shorter than bulb, aciculate distally ( Figs. 10—11 View FIGURES 10 – 14 , 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ). Females are distinguished by the presence of epigynal pouch anterior to the epigastric furrow and by lacking foveae and positioning ridges below it ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 39 View FIGURES 37 – 41 ).

Description. Total length (males and females) 9.09–14.3. Prosoma longer than wide, posteriorly bulging. Six eyes arranged in three diads, lateral eyes on a tubercle ( Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). PLE subequal or larger than ALE; PME smaller. Chelicerae with an acute lamina separated from paturon by deep depression ( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ) with retromarginal gland area beside it ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ); three to four large, well spaced ectal stridulatory ridges ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ); a membranous promarginal lobe between lamina and base of fang ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ); venom outlet slit-shaped, at base of relatively short fang ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 42 – 47 ). Endites elongated, converging anteriorly, with membranous apical edge. Labium fused to sternum, longer than wide in males, wider than long in females. Sternum longer than wide in both sexes with marked borders ( Figs. 5–8 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tarsi with well developed onychium ( Figs. 21–24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ). Superior claws of legs I and II with two rows of teeth on proclaws and a single row on retroclaws ( Figs. 21–22 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ), in both cases reaching the tip of the claw. Superior claws of legs III and IV with a single row of teeth, not reaching the tip of the claw ( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ). Inferior claws with a single tooth ( Figs. 21– 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ). Tarsal organ exposed ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ). Proximal plate of trichobothrial socket smooth ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ). Female palps with a central apical lobe (perhaps a relict of claw), a pair of apical prolateral blunt macrosetae ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ) and femoral stridulatory thorn ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ). Abdomen elongated, posteriorly acute. Male epiandrous spigots scattered along the margin of the epigastric furrow ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ). Tracheal system with a unique median apodemal lobe ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 14 ). Spinnerets similar in males and females ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Anterior lateral spinnerets (ALS) with two major ampullate gland spigots (MAP) ( Figs. 32–33, 35 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Piriform gland spigots (PI) field somewhat isolated from MAP field by a slight depression ( Figs. 32–33, 35 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Posterior median spinnerets (PMS) tetrahedral, with a single aciniform gland spigot (AC), and a projecting median lamina bearing a field of spicules ( Figs. 34, 36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Posterior lateral spinnerets (PLS) conical with a blunt AC ( Figs. 34, 36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Colulus well defined ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ), with developed posterior projection ( Fig. 44, 46 View FIGURES 42 – 47 ).

Male palp: Atypical for Scytodidae , tarsus subequal or smaller than tegulum, not prolonged apically, without prolateral blunt macrosetae which do occur in females ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ); tegulum long inserted apically on the tarsus with coiled spermatic duct; embolus long, slightly shorter than bulb, aciculate distally; embolus outlet on retromargin ( Figs. 10—11 View FIGURES 10 – 14 , 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 – 29 ).

Female genitalia: Also atypical for the family, by lacking foveae and positioning ridges below the epigastric furrow, but with an epigynal pouch anterior to it, like in most Scytodidae ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 39 View FIGURES 37 – 41 ). Vulva with two pairs of rounded, thick spermathecae arising from the epigastric furrow ( Figs. 13—14 View FIGURES 10 – 14 , 37–41 View FIGURES 37 – 41 ). Inner spermathecae twice as large as outer. Spermathecae with gland ductules well spaced or in patches of two to many glands ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 37 – 41 ).

Natural history. A male specimen was found under a log, hanging on its web (M. Ramírez, personal observation).

Distribution. Southeast Asia ( Thailand, Malaysia, South of China)

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Scytodidae

Loc

Stedocys Ono, 1995

Labarque, Facundo M., Grismado, Cristian J., Ramírez, Martín J., Yan, Hengmei & Griswold, Charles E. 2009
2009
Loc

Stedocys

Ono 1995: 132
1995
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF