Alaptus minutus Dozier, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4279.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A6B42AF-E5B1-488D-9C15-4868E96F0363 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5098987 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3B84B-FFF5-FFE3-FF15-B18EFC8B712D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Alaptus minutus Dozier, 1932 |
status |
|
Alaptus minutus Dozier, 1932 View in CoL
( Figs 185–189 View FIGURES 185 – 189 )
Alaptus minutus Dozier 1932: 89 View in CoL –90. Type locality: Port-au-Prince , Haiti.
Alaptus minutus Dozier View in CoL : De Santis 1979: 362 (catalog); Yoshimoto 1990: 23 (list).
Type material examined. Holotype male [USNM] on slide ( Fig. 187 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) labeled: 1. “ Alaptus minutus Dozier ♂ Reared from lime foliage infested with Parlatoria zizyphus etc. Port-au-Prince, Haiti. June 18, 1931 H. L. Dozier”; 2. [red] “ Alaptus minutus Dozier ♂ Type No. 69494 U.S.N.M.”; 3. [barcode] “USNMENT 01049024”. The holotype ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) is uncleared, complete, mounted dorsoventrally.
Distribution. Neotropical:? Argentina * and Haiti.
Hosts. Unknown.
Comments. The body length of the holotype ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) is 291 µm, not 215 µm as it was incorrectly indicated by Dozier (1932). Its other important features are as follows: antenna ( Fig. 188 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) with F1 much shorter than pedicel and a little shorter than the following flagellomeres; midlobe of mesoscutum faintly transversely striate, without adnotaular setae; axillar seta ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) extremely long (90 µm), extending beyond posterior margin of propodeum; fore wing ( Figs 185, 189 View FIGURES 185 – 189 ) 9.6× as long as wide, disc with a median row of 7 setae on one wing and 10 setae on the other wing, longest marginal seta 4.6× maximum wing width, the macrochaeta on the marginal vein very long (90 µm). This Neotropical species is without any doubt a good taxon but a conspecific female from Haiti is needed to provide its proper diagnosis. However, I have identified the following two rather poorly slide-mounted females as very likely to be A. minutus : ARGENTINA: MISIONES : Loreto, 14.ii. 1 949, [A.A. Ogloblin] [1 ♀, MLPA] . San Ignacio, Chacra Yabebirí, 3.iv.1931, A.A. Ogloblin [1 ♀, MLPA]. They are characterized by the following morphological features: body length 240 µm and 270 µm; antenna shorter than body, with rather short funicle segments (all at least a little longer than wide, F1 the shortest and F2 shorter than following funicle segments), mesosoma notably lighter than head and gaster; fore wing about 10× as long as wide, disc with a median row of about 11 setae, and macrochaeta on marginal vein very long.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Alaptus minutus Dozier, 1932
Serguei V. Triapitsyn 2017 |
Alaptus minutus
Yoshimoto 1990: 23 |
De 1979: 362 |
Alaptus minutus
Dozier 1932: 89 |