Eplumula Williams, 1982
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4890280 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4689366 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3110F-4072-FFED-FF64-DEA9525789B0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eplumula Williams, 1982 |
status |
|
Genus Eplumula Williams, 1982 View in CoL
Eplumula Williams, 1982: 229 View in CoL .
Eplumura [sic] – Takeda 1995: 138.
Eplumra [sic] – Gosliner et al. 1996: 235. — Minemizu 2000: 187.
TYPE SPECIES. — Latreillia phalangium de Haan, 1839 View in CoL by original designation ( Williams 1982: 229). Gender: feminine.
DIAGNOSIS. — Last pair of pereopods (P5) conspicuously short, total length of each appendage shorter than merus of third pair (P4) ( Fig. 2 View FIG ); each propodus of P5 half or less that half length of carpus of P5; without conspicuous, feather-like setae on sides, distally flattened, broadened, often distally spinose; dactyli forming subchelae ( Fig. 2 View FIG ; see also Williams 1982: fig. 1a).
REMARKS
Williams (1982) proposed Eplumula on the basis of the characteristic nature of the last pair of pereopods (P5) of two species of Latreillia : L. australiensis Henderson, 1888 and L. phalangium de Haan, 1839 . The P5 are shorter than the merus of the P4, their propodi are distally flattened and broadened, and lack the feather-like setae of Latreillia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Eplumula Williams, 1982
Castro, Peter, Williams, Austin B. & Cooper, Lara L. 2003 |
Eplumula
WILLIAMS A. B. 1982: 229 |