Fedotovia feti, Fomichev, Alexander A. & Marusik, Yuri M., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A2C4FECE-761A-409C-A03F-3D6D7764F384 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5625364 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A1E82C-FF9D-9C32-47E5-F9BEC711F851 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Fedotovia feti |
status |
sp. nov. |
Fedotovia feti View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 16‒18 View FIGURES 13 – 21 , 24‒25 View FIGURES 22 – 28 , 48‒55 View FIGURES 40 – 55 , 60‒63 View FIGURES 56 – 63 , Map 1
F. uzbekistanica: Ovtsharenko & Platnick 1991: 104 View in CoL (♀ from Mongolia misidentified).
Types: MONGOLIA: Ömnögovi Aimag: holotype ♂ (ZMMU) and paratypes 3♂, 1♀ (ZMMU) Noyon Somon, Noyon uul (Mts.), 43°01.73’N 102°05.90’E, 1700 m, 30‒ 31.05.1997 (Yu.M. Marusik); 1♂, 4♀ (NHMB 809) Sevrej ul Gebirge, 10 km SW von Somon Sevrej, 1600 m, 17.VI.1967. Vorberge von Sevrej ul, sehr öde Hochwüste, mit Schotterpanzer und Kies bedeckter Boden. Unter Steinen geeinzelt (Z. Kaszab); Govi-Altai Aimag: 1♂, 2♀ (NHMB 582) Gobi Altaj Gebirge 9 km S von Somon Beger, 1600 m, 26.VI.1966. Am nordlich exponierten flachen Berghang (am “beel”), am Öden, am Steinboden, unter Steinen geeinzelt (Z. Kaszab).
Etymology. The specific name is a patronym in honour of our friend, scorpionologist Victor Fet ( Marshall University, Huntington, USA).
Diagnosis. The new species is most closely related to F. uzbekistanica , from which it can be distinguished by the larger body size, longer and thinner legs in both sexes and smaller posterior median eyes in females. The male palp of these species differs by size (larger in new species) and straight retrolateral margin of cymbium in F. uzbekistanica (strongly concave in new species, cf. Figs 24, 26 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ). From F. mikhailovi sp. n. it differs by the shortened and curved tibial apophysis. Females differ from congeners by the wider posterior part of epigynal fovea, as well as by length and thickness of insemination ducts (see Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).
Description. Male (holotype). Total length 8.6. Carapace: 3.9 long, 2.95 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.2, PME 0.14, PLE 0.19, AME‒AME 0.1, AME‒ALE 0.04, PME‒PME 0.07, PME‒PLE 0.2, ALE‒PLE 0.26; MOQ length 0.49, front width 0.33, back width 0.37. Coloration: Carapace, chelicerae, labium, maxillae and sternum light brown. Cheliceral promargin with 2 teeth, retromargin with 5 teeth. Legs yellow. Opisthosoma dorsally yellow-grey, ventrally cream-colored. Large specimens much darker. Spinnerets yellow. Tibia I length/width ratio 4.9. Spination as in Table 2 View TABLE 2 .
Leg measurements
Palp as in Figs 16‒18 View FIGURES 13 – 21 , 24 View FIGURES 22 – 28 . Cymbium with concave retrolateral margin ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ); tibial apophysis thick and relatively short (shorter than tibia), bent in mid-half; distal part of median apophysis strongly bent; embolus about 6.6 long (about 1.5 times longer than carapace).
Female. Total length 10.3. Carapace: 4.3 long, 3.3 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.23, PME 0.17, PLE 0.2, AME‒AME 0.11, AME‒ALE 0.07, PME‒PME 0.07, PME‒PLE 0.21, ALE‒PLE 0.27; MOQ length 0.53, front width 0.36, back width 0.41. Coloration: Carapace light brown. Chelicerae brown. Promargin with 2 teeth, retromargin with 5‒6 teeth. Labium, maxillae and sternum brown. Legs yellow, but metatarsi and tarsi of I and II legs light brown. Opisthosoma cream-colored. Spinnerets yellow. Large specimens much darker. Tibia I length/width ratio 4.0. Spination as in Table 2 View TABLE 2 .
Leg measurements
Epigyne as in Figs 25 View FIGURES 22 – 28 , 60‒63 View FIGURES 56 – 63 ; epigynal fovea looks like as an elongated rectangle.
Size variation. Males (n = 6) vary from 8.6 to 10 in body length, carapace 3.9–4.8 long and 2.95–3.8 wide. Females (n = 7) vary from 9 to 11.7 in body length, carapace 3.25–4.85 long and 2.65–3.8 wide.
Distribution. Southwestern Mongolia.
Comments. In addition to morphological differences indicating that F. feti sp. n. is a separate species, there is another evidence supporting the status of this Mongolian population. The Mongolian ( F. feti sp. n.) and Central Asian ( F. uzbekistanica ) populations are separated by Tien Shan and Pamir-Alai Mountains reaching at height 7000 and 5000 m, respectively. Since all Fedotovia species inhabit deserts, high mountains are an insurmountable obstacle for the dispersal of desert (= eremic) species. Similar pattern of distribution of related eremic species are known in other group of spiders, for example in Yllenus Simon, 1868 (Salticidae) ( Logunov & Marusik 2003) or Evippa Simon, 1882 (Lycosidae) (Marusik et al. 2003), and also in insects, for example in the carpenter-moths ( Cossidae ) ( Yakovlev & Dubatolov 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Fedotovia feti
Fomichev, Alexander A. & Marusik, Yuri M. 2015 |
F. uzbekistanica:
Ovtsharenko 1991: 104 |