Podaena obscura Ordish, 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2678.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB43BE83-EBB8-4D58-85CF-CBE73DD683FE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A1C83B-FFE6-8F36-CCC2-09BFFE17FCFA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Podaena obscura Ordish, 1984 |
status |
|
Podaena obscura Ordish, 1984 View in CoL
( Figs 11, 12, 13, 14 View FIGURES 1−24 , 33, 37 View FIGURES 31−38 , 47 View FIGURES 47−51 , 65, 68 View FIGURES 61−68 , 75, 76 View FIGURES 75−78 , 92, 93 View FIGURES 83−94 , 97 View FIGURES 95−98 , 104)
Podaena obscura Ordish, 1984: 16 View in CoL , figs 58, 85, 114. Differential diagnosis. Male ( Fig. 104) body length (taken from anterior margin of labrum to elytral apex) 1.93 mm; female body length 2.05 mm. The male maxillary palps are modified ( Figs 11−14 View FIGURES 1−24 ) and show some variability among populations. However, together with the male foretibiae, they are the best characters to distinguish P. obscura View in CoL from all other species. In some localities (e.g. Rahu Creek) the third palpomere has a long wide groove with one well expanded margin, appearing as subtriangular on the lateroventral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1−24 ). In other populations (e.g. Karamea Bluff) the expanded margin is less developed and the palpomere appears narrower on the lateroventral view ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 1−24 ). The fourth palpomere also has a groove, and is laterally constricted in its distal half ( Figs 11, 13 View FIGURES 1−24 ). This variability was mentioned by Ordish (1984: 16) although he did not illustrate the palp of P. obscura View in CoL . Males with the more expanded, subtriangular third palpomere ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1−24 ) may be superficially confused with males of P. latipalpis View in CoL , but in this latter species the fourth palpomere is always laterally compressed and foliaceous ( Figs 7, 9 View FIGURES 1−24 ).
Male foretibiae are modified ( Figs 33, 37 View FIGURES 31−38 ), but very similar to those of P. dentipalpis View in CoL ( Figs 34, 38 View FIGURES 31−38 ) and P. trochanteralis View in CoL ( Figs 32, 36 View FIGURES 31−38 ), all with a pronounced lateral expansion in the anterior view ( Figs 32−34 View FIGURES 31−38 ) and tibial spines 1 and 2 inserted close together ( Figs 36−38 View FIGURES 31−38 ). Although there are subtle differences in the male foretibiae of P. obscura View in CoL , P. dentipalpis View in CoL and P. trochanteralis View in CoL ( Figs 32−34, 36−38 View FIGURES 31−38 ), which assist in their separation, the male maxillary palps are the only reliable means of separating these three species. Furthermore, P. obscura View in CoL is shorter than P. trochanteralis View in CoL and the metaventral glabrous area on the disc ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 47−51 ) is somewhat different from that of P. trochanteralis View in CoL ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 47−51 ).
The male genitalia are similar and therefore not diagnostic among P. obscura , P. dentipalpis , P. kuscheli and the species of the P. latipalpis complex. The remaining characters that are diagnostic for other species, i.e. the last abdominal male tergite (as in Fig. 54 View FIGURES 52−60 ), the last abdominal female tergite ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61−68 ), the gonocoxite ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 61−68 ), the male genitalia ( Figs 75−76 View FIGURES 75−78 ) and the spermatheca ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 83−94 ), are also very similar among several species and not useful to distinguish P. obscura from its closest congeners.
Distribution. As in Fig. 97 View FIGURES 95−98 . Widely distributed in the northwest of the South Island, with two additional single records further south. The apparent gap in the centre of the South Island may be due to lack of collecting rather than indicate a true absence of P. obscura in those areas (WD and MK).
Material examined. Type material. Holotype: South Island : Buller ( BR): Male – “Rahu Ck / Rahu Saddle / 600m 6 Apr. 73 / J.S.Dugdale ”.
Paratypes: South Island : Nelson ( NN) : 6 males, 2 females (2 males in alcohol, 4 males dry-mounted: printed labels, 2 females dry-mounted: printed labels) ( NZAC): “Flora Hut, NN / ex small bush strm. / 28 Dec. 1972 G.K.” . 4 males, 6 females (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Flora Stm NN., at Flora Hut, 28.12.72 G.K.” . 28 males + one head, 13 females (20 males in alcohol, 8 dry-mounted: printed labels, 13 females in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Flora Hut, NN / ex small bush strm / 28 Dec. 1972. G.K.”, “See slide”. Male legs (microslide) ( MONZ) “Flora Hut, NN / ex small bush strm / 28 Dec. 1972. G.K.” . 1 male (dry-mounted) ( NZAC): “Cobb Saddle / 1030 m. / 9 Feb 73, G.K.”, “small slow, strm. in bush” . 1 male, 2 females (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “ Cobb Rd. 330m, 8.2.73 G.K., stm. in bush” . 8 males, 8 females (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Cobb Rd 330 m., 9.2.73 G.K.” 13 males, 11 females (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “L. Cobb. 800m / 9.2.1973 / G. Kuschel ” [see note below] . 1 male (dry-mounted, teneral), ( NZAC): “Orbit CK 810 m. / mt Kendall / upper Karamea / 10.2.73 A.K. Walker ” . 2 males, 4 females (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Surveyors ck, Karamea Bluff / 25 Jun 73 / G.K + J.McB.” . 6 males, 5 females (1 male dry-mounted: printed label, 5 males and 5 females in alcohol) ( NZAC): “ 1 km S of Sur− / veyors ck, Kara− / mea Bluff / 25 Jun 73, G.K + J.McB.” . 1 female (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Anatoki R. / nr. Takaka. / 8 Feb 73 G.K.” . 5 males, 1 female (in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Takaka Hill / West side / 8.2.73, G.K.”. Buller ( BR) : 4 males, 5 females (3 males in alcohol, 1 male dry-mounted: printed label, 5 females in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Maruia Saddle / 430’ 11.4.73 / G. Kuschel” . 13 males, 8 females (11 males in alcohol, 2 males dry mounted: printed labels, 6 females in alcohol, 2 females dry-mounted: printed labels, one slide) ( MONZ): “Lewis Pass / Goings Bridge / 815 m. 11.4.73”, “See Slide” . 1 male (dry-mounted) ( MONZ): “Lewis Pass / 815 m. / 11.4.73” . 5 males, 17 females (1 male dry mounted: printed label, 4 males in alcohol, 2 females dry mounted: printed labels, 15 females in alcohol) ( NZAC): “Rahu CK, 600m / 6 Apr 73, J.S.D. / Rahu Saddle” . 1 male (dry-mounted, one slide) ( MONZ): “Rahu CK 2000’ / Rahu Saddle, in / side fiffles of 20’ / wide stream. Water / depth 1−3’. 6 Apr. 73 / J.S.D. / under dense canopy”, “See Slide”. Otago Lakes (OL) : 1 male (teneral, dry-mounted,), 1 female (teneral, dry-mounted: printed label) ( NZAC): “Dinner CK. / L. Hawea / 29.3.73 G.K.”. Central Otago (CO) : 5 males, 4 females (4 males in alcohol, 1 male dry-mounted: printed label, 4 females in alcohol, one teneral) ( NZAC): “Gorge CK above / cave 15.3.73 / G. Kuschel” .
Additional material examined. South Island: Nelson ( NN): 1 male, 1 female (dry-mounted) ( MONZ): “Cobb Ra. / Nelson. NZ, 9. Feb. 73 / G. Kuschel ”. 1 male (dry-mounted) ( MONZ): “Flora Ck. by put / stones and twigs / in fast. flowing / reaches 23.3.71 / J.S. Dugdale ”. 1 male (dry mounted: printed label) ( NZAC): “Anatoki R. / nr. Takaka / 8 Feb. 73 G.K.”, “in bush in / small side / stream”. Buller ( BR): 1 female (drymounted) ( NMWA): “NEW ZEALAND: S− Isl. BR|NN / Lyell Creek Valley / 10 km NE Inangahua / 7.2.1997 Schuh & Lang”. 1 male, 4 females (1 male dry-mounted: printed label, 4 females in alcohol) ( MONZ): “sp 4 / Hydraenidae 4 Podaena / + undet sp. B 1 Podaena / BR Little Boatman’s CK / above mine 24|7|87 / ADT weed”. 1 male (dry-mounted: printed label) ( CDMS): “ Sandy creek near Kawatiri. Buller / NEW ZEALAND / 1−12−96, 5−S / Beech Forest . J. A. Delgado leg” .
Note. As shown in Table 1, a comparison of paratype numbers given by Ordish (1984: 17) and our counting of the material available shows that 72 paratypes of P. obscura are missing. Numbers given in the LCD are even higher than those in Ordish (1984), but we have to regard numbers in the latter publication as the correct numbers of designated paratypes, not those in the LCD. However, from data available in the LCD, we suggest that a possible source for the large discrepancy in the total number of paratypes was an error in recording a sample with data “L. Cobb. 800m / 9.2.1973 / G. Kuschel” listed in the LCD with a much greater number of specimens than those we have located and examined (see above). Furthermore, we have not been able to locate a sample of three putative paratypes listed in the LCD with data: “Crooked River WD, 1.11.1978, R.R. Scott”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Podaena obscura Ordish, 1984
Delgado, Juan A. & Palma, Ricardo L. 2010 |
Podaena obscura
Ordish, R. G. 1984: 16 |
Ordish, R. G. 1984: 16 |