Anaphes (Anaphes) crassipennis Soyka, 1946
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.432.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8EBC19E9-BA98-44AF-ACEB-11C085CF06B6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A1AD3B-E738-992A-FF70-4324FEA0C403 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anaphes (Anaphes) crassipennis Soyka, 1946 |
status |
|
Anaphes (Anaphes) crassipennis Soyka, 1946 View in CoL
Figs 9–12 View Figs 9–12
Anaphes crassipennis Soyka, 1946: 41 View in CoL .
Anaphes brachygaster Debauche, 1948 View in CoL (misidentification): Hellén, 1974: 26–27 (in part,
record from “Terijoki”, USSR).
Anaphes crassipennis Soyka : Huber, 1992: 73 (list).
Anaphes (Anaphes) crassipennis Soyka : Huber & Thuróczy, 2018: 25 (list, type information,
synonyms), 45 (key), 48 (host), 87 (illustration); Triapitsyn et al., 2020: 569–570 (records from Finland, distribution, host).
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Russia: Leningradskaya oblast’, Vsevolozhskiy rayon, Vaganovo, 60°05’24.5’’N 31°02’08.3’’E, 25 m, 15–30. GoogleMaps VI 2016 (A. A. Knyshov) [1 ♀, UCRC].
Moskovskaya oblast’: Noginskiy rayon, Fryazevo (M. E. Tretiakov): 25.VI–2.VII 2000 [1 ♀,
UCRC]; 25.VII 2002 [1 ♀, UCRC]. Pushkinskiy rayon, Pushkino, Mamontovka, 5–15.VII
2001 (E.Ya. Shuvakhina) [1 ♀, UCRC]. Saint Petersburg, Kurortnyi rayon, Zelenogorsk,
12. VI 1927 (W. Hellén), at railway tracks [1 ♀, FMNH] (misidentified by W. Hellén as A.
brachygaster). Sakhalinskaya oblast’, Sakhalin Island, 6 km E of Sokol, near Belaya River,
16.VIII 2001 (D.J. Bennett, T. R. Anderson) [1 ♀, CAS] .
EXTRALIMITAL MATERIAL EXAMINED. Belgium: Liège, Wanze, Antheit, Corphalie
( R. Detry): 14–28.VII 1989 [1 ♀, ISNB]; 6–20.X 1989 [1 ♀, ISNB]. France: Languedoc , La
Gard ou Gordon, 43°55’45’’N 4°23’25’’E, 10–13. VI GoogleMaps 2005 (J. George) [1 ♀, UCRC] .
Hungary: Vas County, W of Kőszeg , 47°23’09’’N 16°31’19’’E, 355 m, 16–20.VI 2009 GoogleMaps (I.
Mikó) [2 ♀, UCRC] .
DIAGNOSIS. FEMALE (specimens from the European part of Russia, Belgium, France and Hungary). Body length (slide-mounted specimens) 0.8–0.9 mm. Antenna ( Fig. 9 View Figs 9–12 ) with scape (excluding radicle) 3.5–3.7× as long as wide, without distinct cross-ridges; F2–F6
longer than pedicel, F2 4.2–5.0× as long as wide, F3 the longest funicular, F2 usually without
mps but in one specimen with 1 mps, F3–F6 each with 2 mps; clava with 6 mps, 3.8–4.1× as long as wide, 1.1–1.2× as long as combined length of F5 and F6. Fore wing ( Fig. 10 View Figs 9–12 ) 4.9–
5.3× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 0.8–0.9× maximum wing width; marginal space separated from medial space by 1–2 lines of setae. Hind wing ( Fig. 10 View Figs 9–12 ) 18–20× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 2.9–3.3× maximum wing width, disc with 1–2 irregular rows of setae apically. Metatarsomere 1 distinctly longer than metatarsomere 2 ( Fig. 12 View Figs 9–12 ). Ovipositor
( Fig. 11 View Figs 9–12 ) occupying usually about 0.9× length of gaster but occasionally its entire length (and thus not extending forward under mesosoma), not exserted beyond apex of gaster posteriorly,
and about 1.0× length of metatibia.
MALE. Known (Huber & Thuróczy, 2018).
DISTRIBUTION. Russia *; Austria, Belgium, Finland, France *, Germany, Hungary *,
Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Sweden, United Kingdom. Some of these records (Noyes,
2019) may need verification.
HOST. Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera) : Macrophya punctumalbum (L., 1767) (Huber &
Thuróczy 2018) and also an unidentified sawfly species, probably either Tenthredo sp. or
Rhogogaster sp. (Triapitsyn et al., 2020).
COMMENTS. I examined a card-mounted female (in FMNH) from Zelenogorsk, Kurortnyi rayon, Saint Petersburg, Russia, identified by W. Hellén as Anaphes brachygaster
Debauche, 1948 and labeled only as “Terijoki. Hellén.” and “140”; in the unpublished W.
Hellén’s notebooks in the FMNH, this number on light brown paper corresponds to the following information (M. Koponen, personal communication): collected on 12. VI 1927 at a side of railway tracks. Following slide-mounting, I determined it to belong to A. (Anaphes)
crassipennis.
I also examined the following specimen that keys to A. (Anaphes) crassipennis in Huber
& Thuróczy (2018) but are more or less different from the positively identified ones of this species in one or several characteristics: Belgium: Walloon Brabant, Waterloo, 30.VIII–9.IX
1992, in garden (P. Dessart) [1 ♀, ISNB] .
rayon, Moskovskaya oblast’, Russia). 9) Antenna, 10) wings, 11) ovipositor, 12) metatibia and metatarsus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anaphes (Anaphes) crassipennis Soyka, 1946
Triapitsyn, S. V. 2021 |
Anaphes brachygaster
Debauche 1948 |
Anaphes crassipennis
Soyka 1946: 41 |