Anaphes (Anaphes) rfe Triapitsyn, 2021

Triapitsyn, S. V., 2021, Review of the genus Anaphes Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Russia, part 1: subgenus Anaphes s. str., Far Eastern Entomologist 432, pp. 1-48 : 41-43

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.432.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8EBC19E9-BA98-44AF-ACEB-11C085CF06B6

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A46CF4C-8BFE-410D-9340-66927C89F688

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:8A46CF4C-8BFE-410D-9340-66927C89F688

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Anaphes (Anaphes) rfe Triapitsyn
status

sp. nov.

Anaphes (Anaphes) rfe Triapitsyn , sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ 8A46CF4C-8BFE-410D-9340-66927C89F688

Figs 90–95 View Figs 90–95

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype female [ ZIN] on slide ( Fig. 90 View Figs 90–95 ): Russia: Primorskii krai,

Ussuriyskiy rayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 43.66°N 132.25°E, 200 m, 26–31.VIII 2000 (M. V. GoogleMaps

Michailovskaya), MT. Paratypes (all on slides): China: Beijing, Mentougou District, Liyan

Ling , Linshan Mts., 40°00.28’N 115°30.75’E, 1749 m, 2.VIII 2002 (G. Melika) [1 ♀, GoogleMaps

UCRC]. Russia: Primorskii krai, Ussuriyskiy rayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 43.66°N 132.25°E GoogleMaps ,

200 m (M. V. Michailovskaya), MT: 5–11.VIII 1999 [1 ♀, UCRC]; 11–20.VIII 2000 [1 ♀,

UCRC]; 26–31.VIII 2000 [1 ♀, IBPV].

DESCRIPTION. FEMALE (holotype). Body ( Fig. 92 View Figs 90–95 ) dark brown; scape and pedicel light brown, flagellum brown; legs light brown except coxae brown. Mesosoma with faint sculpture, that on vertex more conspicuous. Antenna ( Fig. 91 View Figs 90–95 ) with scape (excluding radicle)

3.8× as long as wide, almost smooth; F2 2.5–2.6× as long as wide and shorter than pedicel,

combined length of F1 and F2 notably longer than F3; F3, F4 and F6 the longest funiculars,

subequal in length and about as long as pedicel; F2 without mps, mps on F3 (1), F4 (2), F5

(2) and F6 (2); clava with 6 mps, 3.0× as long as wide, 1.3× as long as combined length of F5

and F6. Fore wing ( Fig. 94 View Figs 90–95 ) almost 6.8× as long as wide; longest marginal seta almost 1.7×

maximum wing width; marginal space separated from medial space by 2 lines of setae

(medial space very small). Hind wing ( Fig. 95 View Figs 90–95 ) about 22× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 4.6× maximum wing width, disc with only admarginal rows of setae on one wing and with

1 additional seta apically on the other wing. Metatarsomere 1 about as long as metatarsomere

2 ( Fig. 93 View Figs 90–95 ). Ovipositor ( Fig. 92 View Figs 90–95 ) occupying entire length of gaster (but not extending forward under mesosoma), not exserted beyond apex of gaster posteriorly, and 1.3× length of metatibia.

Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Body 612 (of the slide-mounted specimen); mesosoma 227; metatibia: 200; gaster 258; ovipositor 258. Scape (minus radicle) 103; pedicel 48;

F1 18; F2 38 (39); F3 48; F4 48; F5 45; F6 48; clava 130. Fore wing 615:91; longest marginal seta 151. Hind wing 606:27; longest marginal seta 124.

Variation (paratypes). Body length 0.57–0.66 mm (slide-mounted specimens). Antenna with scape (excluding radicle) 3.2–3.5× as long as wide, F2 2.4× as long as wide, F3 sometimes slightly shorter than following funiculars and F5 sometimes as long as F4 and F6, F4 with 1

or 2 mps, clava 2.8–3.1× as long as wide and 1.2–1.3× as long as combined length of F5 and

F6. Fore wing 6.5–6.6× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 1.6–1.7× maximum wing width.

Hind wing 19–22× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 3.9–4.5× maximum wing width,

disc with only admarginal rows of setae. Ovipositor 1.4–1.5× length of metatibia.

MALE. Unknown.

DIAGNOSIS. Anaphes (Anaphes) rfe is somewhat similar to A. (Anaphes) medius ; in the latter species, female antenna ( Figs 61, 62 View Figs 61–65 ) has a relatively longer funiculars including F2, F3

and F4 always bear 2 mps each, and the clava is 0.8–0.9× as long as combined length of F5

and F6. The female fore wing of A. (Anaphes) medius ( Fig. 63 View Figs 61–65 ) is relative wider, 4.9–5.4× as long as wide, with the longest marginal seta 0.9–1.0× maximum wing width, and the marginal space is separated from medial space by 1 complete line of setae. From A. (Anaphes)

regulus, female of which has a more or less similar fore wing ( Figs 82 View Figs 81–84 , 88 View Figs 85–89 ) but F3 always bears 2 mps, female A. (Anaphes) rfe also differs by a relatively longer ovipositor, which in body, 93) metatibia and metatarsus, 94) fore wing, 95) hind wing.

the former species occupies 0.8–0.9× length of the gaster and is 0.95–1.0× length of the metatibia. From the Nearctic A. (Anaphes) behmani Girault, 1929 , known from New York,

USA (Huber & Thuróczy, 2018), female A. (Anaphes) rfe differs in having only 1 mps on F3

and by the clava being notably longer than the combined length of F5 and F6, whereas female antenna of the former species has 2 mps on F3 and its clava is a little shorter than the combined length of F5 and F6 (Huber, 1992). Anaphes (Anaphes) rfe differs from A. (Anaphes) brevicornis , which also has a rather short funicle of the female antenna, by the different proportions of the funiculars, as indicated in the key.

ETYMOLOGY. The species name, which is treated as a noun in apposition, is an abbre-

viation for the Russian Far East.

HOSTS. Unknown.

ZIN

Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

MT

Mus. Tinro, Vladyvostok

UCRC

University of California, Riverside

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Mymaridae

Genus

Anaphes

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF