Cephennomicrus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4157.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6BF4514A-892F-499F-BC1E-B7920C7A00B0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5681745 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187A9-2921-FFE9-FF03-C64A9EF9F8D2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cephennomicrus |
status |
|
Cephennomicrus View in CoL sp. 1
( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 20 , 71–74 View FIGURES 71 – 74 )
Material studied. Late Eocene of Europe , Rovno amber: sex unknown; inclusion in elongate prism of amber 18 mm long ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 20 ), collection number K-8289 ( SIZK).
Description. Body ( Figs 75–80 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) elongate and moderately strongly convex, dark brown; BL 0.70 mm.
Head ( Figs 76–77, 79–80 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) broadest at eyes, HL 0.10 mm, HW 0.15 mm; head structures poorly visible, compound eyes large and strongly convex, finely faceted. Antennae ( Figs 76, 79 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) much shorter than half BL, AnL about 0.25 mm, antennomeres I–V elongate, the shape of VI–VIII difficult to assess in the studied specimen, IX about as long as broad, X transverse, XI about as long as IX–X combined, slightly broader than X, about twice as long as broad, slightly asymmetrical.
Pronotum ( Figs 75–76, 78–79 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) nearly semioval; PL 0.20 mm, PW 0.25 mm; pronotal disc broadest near base, sides strongly rounded in anterior half and weakly so in posterior third; posterior pronotal corners obtuse-angled; posterior margin arcuate and slightly flattened in front of scutellum; base with two pairs of small and shallow but distinct antebasal pits ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ; abp) connected by narrow transverse antebasal groove ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ; abg). Punctures on pronotal disc fine but distinct, separated by spaces 1.5–2 times as wide as diameters of punctures; setae short, moderately dense, suberect ( Figs 75–78 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ).
Elytra ( Figs 75–80 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) elongate oval, moderately convex and broadest anterior to middle, EL 0.40 mm, EW 0.31 mm, EI 1.28; punctures slightly larger and sparser than those on pronotal disc; setae similar to those on pronotum ( Figs 75–78 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ).
Legs ( Figs 76–77, 80 View FIGURES 75 – 80 ) moderately long, slender, unmodified; all tibiae straight or weakly curved near base.
Remarks. This is the smallest adult of Cephennomicrus found in Rovno amber; the key characters of this genus are clearly visible in the dorsal and ventral view in Figs 78, 80 View FIGURES 75 – 80 . Judging from the body length, proportions of body parts and the shape of pronotum, this species is almost certainly different from all remaining specimens of Cephennomicrus treated in this paper. However, as all congeneric specimens described below, it is an unremarkable species that could be properly defined only by male genital characters.
SIZK |
Schmaulhausen Institute of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |