Rovnoscydmus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4157.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6BF4514A-892F-499F-BC1E-B7920C7A00B0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5681804 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187A9-290A-FFC5-FF03-C01D9FACFE7C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rovnoscydmus |
status |
gen. nov. |
† Rovnoscydmus View in CoL sp. specimen 9
( Figs 22 View FIGURES 21 – 34 , 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 )
Material studied. Late Eocene of Europe , Rovno amber: male; inclusion in elongate, subtriangular prism of amber 23.5 mm long ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 34 ), collection number K-3322 ( SIZK).
Description. Body ( Figs 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) elongate, slender and relatively strongly convex, brown; BL 1.10 mm.
Head ( Figs 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) visible only in lateral view, HL 0.23 mm; only sides of vertex and frons visible; compound eyes large, strongly convex, bean-shaped; tempora slightly shorter than eyes. Punctures on frons and vertex not visible; setae ( Fig. 163 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) sparse, short and suberect. Antennae ( Figs 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) slightly shorter than half BL, AnL 0.53 mm, antennal club not demarcated; antennomeres I–II strongly elongate, III–VII elongate (III only slightly), VIII–X about as long as broad or slightly transverse, XI much shorter than IX–X combined, about 1.6 × as long as broad, with rounded apex.
Pronotum ( Figs 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) visible only in lateral view, broadest site not possible to define; PL 0.28 mm, punctures and setae poorly visible.
Elytra (161–164) elongate oval, strongly convex, broadest site not possible to define, EL 0.60 mm, punctures and setae poorly visible.
Legs ( Figs 161–164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ) moderately long, slender, unmodified.
Remarks. This specimen is visible only in lateral view, but its measurements and proportions are similar to those of Rovnoscydmus species, the metacoxae are clearly separated from sides of metaventrite ( Fig. 164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ), and the antennae are very similar to those of Rovnoscydmus frontalis . Examination in slightly lateroventral view revealed that the metaventral intercoxal process does not differ from that of Rovnoscydmus frontalis . Taking into account the shape of the head in lateral view very similar to that illustrated in Figs 124 View FIGURES 123 – 125 , 138 View FIGURES 135 – 138 and 150 View FIGURES 145 – 150 , determination of the inclusion K-3322 as congeneric with Rovnoscydmus seems strongly supported.
A unique feature of this specimen is the aedeagus (AeL 0.30 mm) protruding from the abdomen ( Figs 161– 164 View FIGURES 161 – 164 ). It demonstrates that Rovnoscydmus has the male copulatory organ typical for most Glandulariini , i.e., with slender parameres visible at both sides of the median lobe; it also seems to be symmetrical. Moreover, as this is the only unambiguously identified male of this genus, it also demonstrates that at least in this species of Rovnoscydmus no peculiar external secondary sexual characters exist.
SIZK |
Schmaulhausen Institute of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Glandulariini |