Compsoneuriella Ulmer, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3835.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5BBF2D80-F682-49E7-9B32-64E75ACAA6CF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6124747 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A087A0-433D-4A12-FF7A-EBEE95C65D40 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Compsoneuriella Ulmer, 1939 |
status |
|
Compsoneuriella Ulmer, 1939 stat. prop.
Compsoneuriella Ulmer 1939 , Arch Hydrobiol. Suppl. 16: p. 563 (adults), p. 672 (nymphs pro parte)
Compsoneuria Braasch & Soldán 1986 Reichenbachia View in CoL 24: p. 59 et auct seq.
Diagnosis. Imago. Overall number of crossveins in the forewing reduced in number compared to other Heptageniidae , except other members of the tribe Compsoneuriini ( Compsoneuria and Notonurus ). Cross veins in the costal and subcostal fields, sometimes also in the radial and median fields, trimmed with violet or brown. Costal and subcostal fields with numerous crossveins (> 15), no rows of crossveins visible in the radial-median fields, sometimes present at apex of the radial field ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). Male foreleg with first tarsal segment slightly shorter than the second one ( Figs 26–27 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). Styliger plate faintly convex ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). Last segment of the gonopods generally smaller than the previous one. Male genitalia with median titillators, penis lobes with apical, subapical and basal spines ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). Lateral sclerite narrow, and basal sclerite well-developed.
Nymph. Head not thickened, dark with whitish spots near the anterior margin ( Figs 81–82 View FIGUR ). Distal dentisetae on maxillae with inner and outer one simple ( Figs 48–51 View FIGURES 48 – 54 ). Labial glossae conical with concave outer margin apically ( Figs 35 View FIGURES 30 – 35 , 68, 72, 75 View FIGURES 68 – 77 ). Scattered setae on the maxillae generally fimbriate ( Figs 52–53 View FIGURES 48 – 54 ). Supracoxal spurs well developed, sharply acute and often pointed ( Figs 81–82 View FIGUR ). Spines on the upper face of femora pointed, or at least with strongly convergent margins ( Figs 37 View FIGURES 36 – 40 , 66 View FIGURES 60 – 67 , 69 View FIGURES 68 – 77 ). Inner margin of femora with long and thin setae ( Figs 36 View FIGURES 36 – 40 , 65 View FIGURES 60 – 67 ). Gills generally whitish with well visible tracheation ( Figs 38–39 View FIGURES 36 – 40 ). All gills with fibrillous and plate like structures, except gill VII only plate-like. Hind tibiae with one row of fine setae on the outer margin ( Figs 36 View FIGURES 36 – 40 , 65 View FIGURES 60 – 67 ). Tarsal claw with 0- 2 subapical teeth. Caudal filaments with whorls of spine like setae on each segment, without long and thin setae.
Eggs. Chorion covered by flat, fibrillose and rounded structures; on each pole, KCT´s around two times the size of the others; micropyle with single margin ( Figs 41–42 View FIGURES 41 – 42 ; Boonsoong & Braasch 2013, fig. 7A–B).
Species included:
Compsoneuriella thienemanni Ulmer, 1939 (imagos, nymphs): Sumatra, Java
Compsoneuriella sp. 1 (imagos, nymphs): Vietnam, Thailand
Compsoneuriella langensis ( Braasch & Boonsoong, 2010) (imagos, nymphs): Thailand comb. nov.
Compsoneuriella tagbanua ( Braasch & Freitag, 2008) (imagos, nymphs): Philippines (Palawan) comb. nov.
Discussion. As already mentioned, the genus Compsoneuriella corresponds to the concept of Compsoneuria by Braasch & Soldán (1986b) and subsequent authors.
At the nymphal stage, Compsoneuriella is distinguished from its relatives by the contrasted color pattern of the cephalic capsule, with at least 4 whitish dots close to the anterior margin, the acute supracoxal spurs, the presence of long and thin setae on the inner margin of the femora, the bristles on the upper face of femora pointed or at least with margins clearly convergent, the outer distal dentiseta of the maxillae entire, and by the presence of a single row of setae on the hind tibiae.
At the imaginal stage, the combination of the number of forewing crossveins in the costal and subcostal fields, the male foretarsi proportions and genitalia will distinguish the genus from Compsoneuria , but differences with Notonurus were not found.
The eggs of Compsoneuriella differ from those of Compsoneuria by the arrangement of the chorion and the margin of the micropyle. To our knowledge, no eggs of Notonurus are presently described.
Within the tribe Compsoneuriini, Compsoneuriella share several features with the Afrotropical genus Notonurus in the nymphal stage, including the overall color pattern of the head and the pointed supracoxal spurs. Compsoneuriella , however, typically has fimbriate scattered setae of the maxillae together with entire distal dentisetae ( Figs. 48–53 View FIGURES 48 – 54 ) whereas those of Notonurus have simple scattered setae on the maxillae and numerous distal dentisetae ( Figs 55–58 View FIGURES 55 – 59 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Compsoneuriella Ulmer, 1939
Sartori, Michel 2014 |
Compsoneuriella
Ulmer 1939 |