Loneura meridionalis Garcia Aldrete, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4969.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:997EC67F-7A07-4C40-93BC-56F8505CAE26 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4746001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039FF66C-FFD0-7414-FF09-D7ED6E5EFB98 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loneura meridionalis Garcia Aldrete |
status |
stat. nov. |
Loneura meridionalis Garcia Aldrete View in CoL stat. rev.
( Figs 22–39 View FIGURES 22–28 View FIGURES 29–35 View FIGURES 36–39 )
Loneura meridionalis Garcia Aldrete, 2003: 12 View in CoL , Figs 1–9 View FIGURES 1–7 View FIGURES 8–14 ; Lima et al., 2019: 184 (taxonomy); Garcia Aldrete et al., 2020: 294 (taxonomy, phylogeny).
Diagnosis. Belonging in species group IB of García Aldrete et al. (2011). This species has a hyaline wing color pattern similar to L. willineri n. sp., related to L. tendalensis and remarkably similar to L. boliviana by the hypandrium arrangement but differing from it in having the phallosome with external parameres long and wide, in having an anterior pair of endophallic sclerites with convex base, besides having an anterior central projection without a group of spines.
Male. Color. Compound eyes ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 ) black, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents; head pattern. Scape brown, pedicel pale brown, f1–f3 pale yellow. Femora pale, almost hyaline with a thin brown belt at the proximal and distal ends; tibiae pale yellow with proximal and distal ends brown; tarsomeres 1 pale brown, tarsomeres 2–3 brown. Forewings ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–28 ) almost hyaline, veins brown, pterostigma with proximal and distal pale-yellow bands, a brown spot at R–Rs crossvein and at confluence CuP–1A. Hindwings hyaline, veins brown, a brown spot at wing base ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–28 ).
Morphology. Compound eyes without interommatidial setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with seven denticles ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Forewings without setae in the veins, pterostigma elongate, narrow basally, wider in the middle; areola postica tall, trapezoid, round apex and insertion of CuA1 at the wing margin before the first bifurcation of M; Rs long as well as its branches, almost straight, R 2+3 slightly convex medially, R 4+5 sinuous, with a tenuous convex curve; M stem slightly concave proximally, then almost straight, with six primary branches, M 6 forked, resulting in M 6a and M 6b ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–28 ); hindwing M with five primary branches ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–28 ) ( Figs 36–39 View FIGURES 36–39 ; see also variations of the wing male and female specimens). Hypandrium of three sclerites, a central sclerite U-shaped, convex anteriorly, with two lateral posterior projections, rounded distally and curved outward; irregular side sclerites narrow distally, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Phallosome with side struts basally not fused, V-shaped, not fused posteriorly to external parameres, these wide and long, bifurcated at base with apical anterior projection and rounded posterior projection, then a constricted area, widening distally, with another apical projection at the inner border, ending in a curved inward projection with a field of pores and arising from this another short curved inward projection; two pairs of endophallic sclerites ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 22–28 ); anterior pair U-shaped, with base convex, proximally with a curved inward projection with a narrow and slender end touching each other, sclerotized area at outer margin, then a sclerotized central area on both inner and outer margins, widening distally, a short inner apical projection and other outward long projection with a radular posterior margin and a lobed end; posterior pair elongate, irregular, proximally concave, with a wide, curved apical end scythe-shaped touching each other and distally turned outward, with long acuminated end ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Epiproct trapezoidal, posteriorly straight, with three central large setae as illustrated ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Paraprocts narrow at the base, slightly triangularly acuminated, with sensory fields with 36 trichobothria on basal rosettes, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–28 ).
Measurements. FW: 5352, HW: 3679, F: 1345, T: 2371, t1: 953, t2: 87, t3: 135, f1: 1102, f2: 1138, Mx4: 314, IO: 666, D: 373, d: 266, PO: 0.71.
Female. Color. Compound eyes black, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents; head pattern ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Scape brown, pedicel pale brown, f1–f3 pale yellow. Femora pale, almost hyaline, with a pale brown belt at proximal and distal ends; tibiae pale brown with distal ends brown and a black spot at proximal ends; tarsomeres 1 pale brown, with distal ends brown, tarsomeres 2–3 brown. Forewings ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–35 ) almost hyaline, veins brown with setae, pterostigma with proximal and distal pale brown bands, a brown spot at R–Rs crossvein and at confluence CuP–1A. Hindwings hyaline, veins brown with a brown spot at wing base ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–35 ).
Morphology. Compound eyes without interommatidial setae ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with six denticles ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Forewing with pterostigma elongate, narrow basally, wider in the middle; areola postica tall, trapezoid, with apex rounded and insertion of CuA1 at the wing margin before the first bifurcation of M; Rs long as well as its branches, slightly concave basally, R 2+3 almost straight, R 4+5 sinuous with a convex curve; M stem slightly concave proximally, then almost straight, with six primary branches, M 1 and M 2 margin insertions near, M 6 forked, resulting in M 6a and M 6b, with a short bifurcation insertion ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–35 ); hindwing M with five primary branches ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–35 ) ( Figs 36–39 View FIGURES 36–39 ; see also variations of the wing male and female specimens). Subgenital plate broad, subtriangular, concave basally, lateral margin straight, sides converging to a pointed apex, pigmented lateral areas, setae directed to inner and anterior areas as illustrated ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Ninth sternum strongly sclerotized, mouth shaped, tightly concave anteriorly, two lateral elliptical areas, and a central convex sclerotized bulge posteriorly ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Gonapophyses: v1 long, sclerotized, slightly wider in the middle and narrowing at the end, with acuminate apex; v 2+3 stout, with a large proximal end, wide at middle and narrowing at the end with five large setae on outer lobes, with a long acuminate apex ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Epiproct wide-based, almost cylindric, rounded and with setae anteriorly as illustrated ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Paraprocts subtrapezoidal, sensory fields with 35 trichobothria on basal rosettes, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 29–35 ).
Measurements. FW: 6019, HW: 3816, F: 1407, T: 2540, t1: 1020, t2: 98, t3: 162, f1: 1075, f2: 1168, Mx4: 366, IO: 681, D: 376, d: 258, PO: 0.68.
Fore & hindwing venation variation. Two specimens, one male and one female, collected at the type locality show the following variations: male right forewing M with five primary branches with M 5 forked, resulting in M 5a and M 5b ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 36–39 ); hindwing M with four primary branches, M 3 forked, resulting in M 3a and M 3b (fig. 37); female right forewing M with seven primary branches, with M 7 forked, resulting in M 7a and M 7b ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 36–39 ), right hindwing M with three primary branches with M 3 forked, resulting in M 3a and M 3b ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 36–39 ).
Material examined. 1 male ( MHNG). ARGENTINA. Salta Province. 22 km N. La Caldera, 550 m, El Ucumar 58, J. Peck. 2–30.XII.1987, Malaise. FIT [flight interception trap], Subtropical humid forest, 1m #, Loneura . meridionalis, A. N. García-Aldrete [det.]. 1 female ( MHNG). ARGENTINA, Jujuy Province. Calilegua Natural Park, 18–28.XII.1987, J. Peck, El Cortaderal, km 6, 800 m, Forest, Malaise, FIT [flight interception trap], 1f#, Loneura meridionalis, A. N. García Aldrete.
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Loneura meridionalis Garcia Aldrete
Cutrim, Marcelo, Neto, Alberto Moreira Da Silva, García Aldrete, Alfonso N. & Rafael, José Albertino 2021 |
Loneura meridionalis
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. & Gonzalez Obando, R. & Carrejo Gironza, N. 2020: 294 |
Lima, D. M. & Silva Neto, A. M. & Garcia Aldrete, A. N. & Bravo, F. 2019: 184 |
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. 2003: 12 |