Campanularia hicksoni Totton, 1930
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.2003.60.18 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039F8846-FFC4-FF9E-2B55-FCFDFF27FC5E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2024-06-21 16:41:35, last updated 2024-06-21 16:58:13) |
scientific name |
Campanularia hicksoni Totton |
status |
|
Campanularia hicksoni Totton View in CoL
Figures 24E–G View Figures 24
Campanularia hicksoni Totton, 1930: 148 View in CoL , figs 7a–e.— Briggs, 1938: 15.— Rees and Thursfield, 1965: 90, 195.— Blanco and Bellusci de Miralles, 1972, 145: 10, figs 6–19.— Naumov and Stepanjants, 1972: 34, 37.— Stepanjants, 1972: 67, fig. 12.— Stepanjants, 1979: 29, pl. 5 fig. 1.— Blanco, 1984: 18, pl. 13 figs 29–31.— El Beshbeeshy, 1991: 94, fig. 22a.—Blanco, 1994: 159.
Campaularia laevis Hickson and Gravely, 1907: 25 , pl. 4 fig. 26.— Ritchie, 1913: 19, fig. 5.— Vanhöffen, 1910: 298, fig. 18 (not Campaularia laevis Hartlaub, 1905: 565 , fig. P1).
Material examined. Stn 44, TM K2792, NMV F91331, infertile colonies on Tulpa diverticula and Eudendrium , specimens alcohol-preserved.
Description. Colonies comprising many pedicellate hydrothecae arising from hydrorhiza overrunning stems and hydrorhizae of other hydroids. Stolons tubular, sometimes contorted, perisarc thick. Pedicels simple, unbranched, variable in length, long, tubular, of same diameter as stolon; most pedicels with 3 or 4 obscure proximal annulations, pedicels thereafter smooth, sometimes with a few groups of undulations or joints marking site of regeneration. Pedicel ending in a slightly expanded distal shoulder, a flattened spherule between stem and basal chamber of hydrotheca.
Hydrotheca deeply campanulate, walls expanding smoothly from base to margin, basal chamber narrow, enclosed by outer walls, diaphragm marked by an annular thickening of wall; margin circular, crenulate, with 8–10 apically flattened cusps, embayments between U-shaped, an almost exact reverse image of cusps. Hydrothecal margins often with 2 or 3 widely separated regenerations. Hydranth with c. 16–18 tentacles.
Perisarc of stems fairly thick, thinning distally along hydrothecal body to margin.
Colour. Colonies transparent and colourless to white.
Measurements (µm)
Pedicel length 1200–3800
diameter 64–72
diameter of spherule 52–64 Hydrotheca depth of basal chamber 40–64 length, diaphragm to margin 640–664 diameter at margin 320–440 height of marginal cusp 40 width of marginal embayment 48–64
Distribution. Antarctic ( Totton, 1930; Briggs, 1938; Stepanjants, 1979).
Remarks. Many hydrothecal margins are damaged and most of the undamaged ones fade in stained mounts The few faint pleats extending downwards from the margin in many hydrothecae may result from collapse in mountant.
Dimensions of the present specimens agree fairly well with those of the “short race” of Campanularia hicksoni recorded from a depth of 92 m from McMurdo Sound ( Totton, 1930) but with the following minor differences: (i) the hydrothecae of the present specimens are a little more campanulate than shown in Totton’s figure; (ii) overall length of the hydrotheca of the present specimens is at the lower range of Totton’s specimens; and (iii) the marginal diameter of the present specimens falls between Totton’s “short race” and those he considered normal for specimens from Cape Adare. Totton’s specimens had a variable number of marginal crenulations (9–20); the number of crenulations on the present specimens are at the lower end of this range .
Blanco, O. M., and Bellusci de Miralles, D. A. 1972. Hydrozoos de la isla Pedro I. Contribuciones del Instituto Antartico Argentino 145: 1 - 29.
Blanco, O. M. 1984. Contribucion al conocimiento de hidrozoos antarticos y subantarticos. Contribuciones del Instituto Antartico Argentino 294: 1 - 53.
Briggs, E. A. 1938. Hydroida. Scientific Reports of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 1914 9: 1 - 46.
El Beshbeeshy, M. 1991. Systematische, Morphologische und Zoogeographische Untersuchungen an den Thekaten Hydroiden des Patagonischen Schelfs. Dissertation, Universitat Hamburg. 390 pp.
Hartlaub, C. 1905. Die Hydroiden der magalhaensischen Region und chilenischen Kuste. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Suppl.) Zool., 6: 497 - 714.
Hickson, S. J., and Gravely, F. H. 1907. Hydroid zoophytes. National Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1904, Natural History 3: 1 - 34.
Naumov, D. V., and Stepanjants, S. D. 1972. Hydroida. In: Marine invertebrates from Adelie Land, collected by the XIIth and XVth French Antarctic Expeditions. 3. Tethys (supplement) 4: 25 - 60.
Rees, W. J., and Thursfield, S. 1965. The hydroid collections of James Ritchie. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1959 - 1966 69: 34 - 220.
Ritchie, J. 1913. The hydroid zoophytes collected by the British Antarctic Expedition of Sir Ernest Shackleton, 1908. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 33: 9 - 34.
Stepanjants, S. D. 1972. Hydroidea of the coastal waters of the Davis Sea (collected by the XI Soviet Antarctic Expedition of 1965 - 66. Issledovaniya Fauny Morei 11: 56 - 79 (in Russian).
Stepanjants, S. D. 1979. Gidroidy vod antarktiki i subantarktiki. Rezul'taty biologicheskikh issledovanii sovetskikh antarkticheskikh ekspeditsii, 6. Issledovaniya Fauny Morei 22: 1 - 99 (in Russian).
Totton, A. K. 1930. Coelenterata. Part V. - Hydroida. British Antarctic ( Terra Nova ) Expedition, 1910, Natural History Report, Zoology 5: 131 - 252.
Vanhoffen, E. 1910. Die Hydroiden der Deutschen SudpolarExpedition 1901 - 1903. Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition 11: 269 - 340.
Figures 24A–G. A–D, Tulpa diverticula, stn 94. A, stem from colony. B, hydrotheca, C, rim of hydrotheca, enlarged, D, base of hydrotheca, enlarged. E–G, Campanularia hicksoni, stn 44. E, hydrotheca. F, base of hydrotheca showing thickening and diaphragm. G, rounded marginal cusps. Scale bar: A, 10 mm; B, 1 mm; C, D, 0.5 mm; E, F, G, 0.5 mm.
TM |
Teylers Museum, Paleontologische |
NMV |
Museum Victoria |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Campanularia hicksoni Totton
Watson, Jeanette W. 2003 |
Campanularia hicksoni
El Beshbeeshy, M. 1991: 94 |
Blanco, O. M. 1984: 18 |
Stepanjants, S. D. 1979: 29 |
Naumov, D. V. & Stepanjants, S. D. 1972: 34 |
Stepanjants, S. D. 1972: 67 |
Rees, W. J. & Thursfield, S. 1965: 90 |
Briggs, E. A. 1938: 15 |
Totton, A. K. 1930: 148 |
Campaularia laevis
Ritchie, J. 1913: 19 |
Vanhoffen, E. 1910: 298 |
Hickson, S. J. & Gravely, F. H. 1907: 25 |
Hartlaub, C. 1905: 565 |