Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.155693 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6278131 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039F87D8-FF88-5769-AF4C-BB96D1AE5C24 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874 |
status |
|
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874 View in CoL a ( Figs. 134 View FIGURES 1 5 View FIGURES 6 12 View FIGURES 13 15 View FIGURES 16 19 View FIGURES 20 28 View FIGURES 29 33 View FIGURE 34 )
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874a: 154 View in CoL .
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874b: 122 View in CoL (synonymic homonym). Macroterma Casey, 1906: 335 View in CoL (as a genus in tribe Myrmedoniini Thomson, 1867 ).
Atheta (Macroterma) View in CoL : Casey, 1910a: 9 (as valid subgenus).
Atheta (Macroterma) View in CoL : Casey, 1910b: 106 (as valid subgenus).
Atheta (Earota) View in CoL : Fenyes, 1920: 206 (as valid subgenus).
Atheta (Macroterma) View in CoL : Fenyes, 1920: 206 (as synonym of Atheta ( Earota )).
Atheta (Earota) View in CoL : Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 655 (as valid subgenus).
Atheta (Macroterma) View in CoL : Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 655 (as synonym of Atheta ( Earota )).
Ischnopoda (Earota) View in CoL : Blackwelder, 1952: 138 (as valid subgenus).
Ischnopoda (Macroterma) View in CoL : Blackwelder, 1952: 138 (as synonym of Ischnopoda ( Earota )).
Earota: Seevers, 1978: 132 View in CoL (as valid genus in subtribe Thamiaraeina Fenyes, 1921 View in CoL ).
Macroterma: Seevers, 1978: 132 View in CoL (as synonym of Earota View in CoL ).
Earota: Ashe View in CoL in Newton, Thayer, Ashe & Chandler, 2000: 371 (as valid genus; tribe Athetini Casey, 1910a View in CoL , not assigned to subtribe).
Macroterma: Ashe View in CoL in Newton, Thayer, Ashe & Chandler, 2000: 371 (as synonym of Earota View in CoL ).
Diagnosis. Earota can be distinguished from other aleocharine genera by the combination of the following characters: broad body; last antennal article as long as three preceding combined; ligula with wide base, split into two lobes ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 6 12 ); pronotum transverse, with microsetae directed posteriorly along the midline of the disc (Type II, Benick & Lohse 1974) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 15 ); pronotal macrosetae moderately long; pronotal hypomera fully visible in lateral view; mesocoxae separated ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 15 ); medial macroseta of mesotibia inconspicuous, shorter than tibial width; tarsal formula 455; metatarsal segment 1 slightly longer than segment 2; one empodial seta for each tarsus; apical process of median lobe of aedeagus straight or slightly bent ventrally in lateral view ( Figs. 21, 26, 28 View FIGURES 20 28 ).
Earota View in CoL differs from Tropimenelytron Pace, 1983 View in CoL by larger and broader body; base of ligula narrower; medial area of prementum with pseudopores; first segment of labial palpus with seta present; complete infraorbital carina, transverse pronotum; and different shape of spermatheca.
Earota View in CoL differs from Geostiba Thomson, 1858 View in CoL by larger and broader body; first segment of labial palpus with seta present; mesocoxae widely separated by broad mesosternal process; large and broad medial lamellae of internal sac of aedeagus; and different shape of spermatheca.
Earota View in CoL differs from Pelioptera Kraatz, 1857 View in CoL by larger body; large and broad medial lamellae of internal sac of aedeagus; and different shape of spermatheca.
Description. Length 3.0 4.5 mm. Body broad, dark brown with lighter elytra and legs.
Head as long as wide; eyes large, 1.21.5 times as long as temples; infraorbital carina complete. Antennal article 2 as long as article 3, article 10 transverse, article 11 as long as articles 810 combined ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 6 12 ). Labrum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 5 ) transverse, anterior margin concave. Adoral surface of labrum (epipharynx) as in Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 5 . Mandibles ( Figs. 35 View FIGURES 1 5 ) broad, medial tooth of right mandible inconspicuous; dorsal molar area with velvety patch consisting of tiny denticles (visible at 400x). Maxilla ( Figs. 79 View FIGURES 6 12 ) with galea extending slightly beyond apex of lacinia; apical lobe of galea covered with numerous fine and short setae; apex of lacinia with row of closely spaced spines, middle portion covered with numerous setae. Maxillary palpus with four segments ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6 12 ). Labium as in Figs. 1012 View FIGURES 6 12 ; labial palpi with three segments ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 6 12 ); first segment with setae and present; ligula with wide base, split into two lobes; medial area of prementum with 912 pseudopores, lateral areas with 3 pores and single spinose pore. Hypopharyngeal lobes as in Fig. 11 View FIGURES 6 12 . Mentum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 6 12 ) with slightly concave anterior margin, medial area with numerous pores.
Pronotum ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 15 ) transverse, broadest at middle, anterior margin straight, lateral and posterior margins convex; surface covered with microsetae directed posteriorly in midline, posteriorly and obliquely laterally in lateral areas (Type II, Benick & Lohse 1974); macrosetae moderately long; hypomera fully visible in lateral view. Meso metasternum as in Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 15 , mesosternal process wide, extended about 1/2 length of mesocoxal cavities, metasternal process about 1/4 length of mesocoxal cavities; mesosternum and mesosternal process not carinate medially; relative lengths of mesosternal process: isthmus: metasternal process in ratio of about 14:8:9; mesocoxal cavities margined posteriorly; mesocoxae separated. Medial macroseta of mesotibia inconspicuous, shorter than tibial width. Tarsal segmentation 455; metatarsal segment 1 slightly longer than segment 2. One empodial seta. Wings fully developed. Posterior margin of elytra straight.
Abdominal terga 35 with moderately transverse basal impression. Tergum 7 as long as tergum 6. Punctation on terga 67 sparser than on terga 35. Tergum 7 with white palisade fringe.
Median lobe of aedeagus narrows apically (in parameral view; Figs. 20, 25, 27 View FIGURES 20 28 ), apex straight or slightly bent ventrally (in lateral view; Figs. 21, 26, 28 View FIGURES 20 28 ). Parameres with apical lobe bearing one long and three short macrosetae ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20 28 ). Copulatory piece of internal sac with narrow apical process ( Figs. 29, 3233 View FIGURES 29 33 ). Medial lamellae (in ventral view) broad, apically with hooklike process each ( Figs. 29, 31, 33 View FIGURES 29 33 ).
Type species. Homalota reyi Kiesenwetter, 1850 by monotypy.
Discussion. The type species of Macroterma ( M. alutacea , by original designation) shares with the type species of Earota all characters listed in the above description. The two species differ from each other only in proportions of antennal segments, in the shape of aedeagus and spermatheca, and in male secondary sexual characters of terga 7 and 8. Therefore, the commonly accepted synonymy of Earota and Macroterma ( Fenyes 1920; Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz 1926; Seevers 1978; Newton et al. 2000) is reconfirmed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Aleocharinae |
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874
Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2002 |
Earota:
Newton 2000: 371 |
Macroterma:
Newton 2000: 371 |
Earota:
Seevers 1978: 132 |
Macroterma:
Seevers 1978: 132 |
Ischnopoda (Earota)
Blackwelder 1952: 138 |
Ischnopoda (Macroterma)
Blackwelder 1952: 138 |
Atheta (Earota)
Bernhauer 1926: 655 |
Atheta (Macroterma)
Bernhauer 1926: 655 |
Atheta (Earota)
Fenyes 1920: 206 |
Atheta (Macroterma)
Fenyes 1920: 206 |
Atheta (Macroterma)
Casey 1910: 9 |
Atheta (Macroterma)
Casey 1910: 106 |
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874a : 154
Rey 1874: 154 |
Earota Mulsant & Rey, 1874b : 122
Casey 1906: 335 |
Rey 1874: 122 |