Hydroscapha shuihau, Fikáček & Hu & Aston & Jia & Liang & Liu & Minoshima, 2020

Fikáček, Martin, Hu, Fang-Shuo, Aston, Paul, Jia, Feng-Long, Liang, Wei-Ren, Liu, Hsing-Che & Minoshima, Yûsuke N., 2020, Comparative morphology of immature stages and adults of Hydroscapha from Taiwan, with description of a new species from Hong Kong (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Hydroscaphidae), Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68, pp. 334-349 : 344

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0051

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E94FC315-590C-4663-BE01-4FC6E29CCED5

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D245BF3-8B7C-465A-A462-66F4542DE99A

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:4D245BF3-8B7C-465A-A462-66F4542DE99A

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Hydroscapha shuihau
status

sp. nov.

Hydroscapha shuihau , new species

Material examined. Holotype: male ( NMPC): Hong Kong, Lantau , Shui Hau, coordinates, 22.220250°N, 113.916434°E, 14 April 2019, coll. P. Aston, washed out of small layer of slime in mud GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 16 exs. ( NMPC, SYSU, NMNS): same label data as the holotype GoogleMaps ; 14 exs. ( NMPC, SYSU, PCPA, AFCD): same locality, 16 November 2013, coll. P. Aston GoogleMaps ; 18 exs. ( PCPA): same locality, 5 November 2017, coll. P. Aston GoogleMaps ; 1 ex. ( PCPA): same locality, 10 December 2013, coll. P. Aston. GoogleMaps

Diagnosis of adult. Hydroscapha shuihau , new species, is very similar to H. hunanensis known from Central China (Hunan). However, it is easily distinguished by the shape of the female tergite VI and sternite VI, which are both only weakly narrowing posteriad (they are both strongly narrowed in the posterior third and projecting as a narrowly rounded posterior portion in H. hunanensis ). Slight differences may be also found in the shape of the aedeagus (wider basally and evenly arcuate in apical half in H. shuihau , narrower basally and nearly straight in apical half except the apex in H. hunanensis ) and in proportions of the terminal antennomere (relatively wider in H. shuihau than in H. hunanensis ) and the mesoventral elevation (relatively shorter in H. shuihau than in H. hunanensis ). For the differences between H. shuihau and H. takahashii , see under the latter species.

Using the keys by Fikáček & Šípková (2009), males of H. shuihau key to H. hunanensis , and females to H. coomani , H. hunanensis , and H. reichardti (which were keyed out together due to absence of distinguishing characters). It differs from H. coomani Löbl, 1994 , in the shape of the male sternite V, which is weakly sinuate on the posterior margin (with a pair of pointed lobes in H. coomani , compare Fig. 4E View Fig to Löbl, 1994: fig. 17). It differs from H. reichardti in male sternite V lacking two distinctly separate tufts of setae (vs. two tufts in H. reichardti , compare Fig. 4E View Fig with Löbl, 1994: fig. 54). Both H. coomani and H. reichardti are also slightly larger than H. shuihau (with the length of forebody ranging 0.85–0.94 mm, compared to 0.70–0.75 mm in H. shuihau ). Major diagnostic characters are listed in Tables 2 and 3 to be compared with those of other Asian species listed by Fikáček & Šípková (2009).

Description of adult ( Figs. 3 View Fig F–J, 4D–F). Total body length: 1.0– 1.1 mm. Length of forebody (from anterior margin of head to posterior margin of elytra): 0.70–0.75 mm. Dorsal colouration reddish brown to dark brown. Labrum angularly excised anteriorly, with two groups of setae dorsally. Antenna ( Fig. 4D View Fig ) with short antennomere III (= second visible) and widely elongate asymmetrical antennomere IX (= ultimate one); the latter with few apical sensilla. Mesoventral elevation subpentagonal, 2.1× wider than long ( Fig. 4F View Fig ).

Male. Protarsus with sucking disc on basal tarsomere. Posteroventral margin of abdominal segment V weakly sinuate, ventral surface with longer setae indistinctly subdivided into two groups ( Fig. 4E View Fig ). Tergite VI widely rounded on posterior margin. Sternite VI without tufts of hairs. Sternite VII ( Fig. 3G View Fig ) with small medioposterior projection. Tergite VII ( Fig. 3H View Fig ) weakly convex posteromesally. Aedeagus ( Fig. 3F View Fig ) wide basally, arcuate in posterior two thirds, gradually narrowing towards apex.

Female. Protarsus without suckers. Abdominal sternite VI ( Fig. 3I View Fig ) widely subtriangular, tergite VI ( Fig. 3J View Fig ) widely rounded posteriorly.

Etymology. The new species is named after the village of Shui Hau on Lantau Island where the species was found. Noun in apposition.

Distribution. The species is only known from Lantau Island in Hong Kong.

Bionomics ( Fig. 8D, E View Fig ). At the type locality, the beetles have been found in filamentous algae in a hygropetric environment on the concrete footpath leading from Shui Hau village to the sea. The footpath is edged by a freshwater marsh on both sides, which is mainly grassy and grazed by water buffalo. The beetles only occur in the hygropetric areas where the footpath has sunken and is covered by a very thin, almost stagnant film of water over a thin layer of mud and the filamentous algae. The beetles are usually present from November to April (mostly in the dry season) when the slope of the marsh allows the hygropetric environment to flourish. The algae die off before the hot summer months and again start to form mats in September; despite this, the beetles were not present until 9 November 2019, even though the filamentous mats of algae were fairly large (80 cm 2). We did not find any beetles in similar-looking habitats in areas situated close to the agricultural land or closer to the sea. The specimens were collected from the green algae together with Sphaerius sp. ( Sphaeriusidae ), Hydraena sp. ( Hydraenidae ), and various Hydrophilidae including Enochrus (Methydrus) esuriens Walker, 1858 , and Paracymus sp. Unfortunately, during the autumn of 2019, material was taken out of the marsh, causing the marsh level to drop by 30 cm, resulting in the drying of the hygropetric areas, and by the end of January 2020 all the areas where the beetles were previously found, were totally dry. No specimens of Hydroscapha were found in the winter of 2019–2020.

NMPC

National Museum Prague

NMNS

National Museum of Natural Science

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF