Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189193 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6224102 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D1172-FFDC-FFBE-2EA0-FD70165857C3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938 |
status |
|
Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938 reinstated
Luperodes pallidulus Chûjô, 1935: 162 .
Monolepta pallidula Chûjô, 1938: 144 ; Chûjô, 1962: 123; Chûjô, 1963a: 25; Chûjô, 1963b: 393; Chûjô, 1965: 97; Kimoto, 1965: 488; Kimoto, 1966: 32; Kimoto, 1969: 47; Kimoto, 1986: 58; Kimoto, 1987: 189; Kimoto, 1989: 256; Kimoto, 1991: 14; Takizawa et al., 1995: 11.
Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938: 145 ; Chûjô, 1962: 132; Chûjô, 1965: 97; Kimoto, 1969: 47 (synonymized with M. pallidula ); Kimoto, 1986: 58.
Description. Total length: males: 5.1–6.4 mm (O: 5.63 mm; n= 6); females: 4.9–6.2 mm (O: 5.73 mm; n= 6). General color yellowish-brown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ); in some specimens antenna, apex of tibia, and tarsi dark brown. Antennomeres 4–10 about 6.2 times longer than broad at apex ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ); length of second to third antennomere 0.79–1.00 (O: 0.87); length of third to fourth antennomere 0.36–0.50 (O: 0.59) ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ). Pronotal length to width 0.65–0.73 (O: 0.69). Maximal width of elytra to length of elytra 0.64–0.69 (O: 0.66). Length of basi-metatarsus to metatibia 0.50–0.57 (O: 0.55).
Male genitalia ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ). Median lobe broad, sub-parallel, curved apically; apex emarginated. Tectum wide and short, about 0.5x as long as median lobe. Ventral surface well sclerotized, with a ridge from apex to apical 1/7. Endophallus with apical spiculae horn-like; with very long median spiculae; four pairs of long, curved, lateral spiculae, apex acute; ventral spiculae consisting of a pair of long spiculae, longitudinal row of short rounded sclerites, and cluster of slender, curved spiculae at middle.
Female genitalia ( Figs. 14–16 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ). Spermathecal cornu ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) slender, apically coiled; middle part long, apically and strongly curved, slightly widened near cornu; nodulus spherical, large; proximal spermathecal duct long, largest near nodulus, tightly coiled. Dorsal part of bursa-sclerites ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) with teeth at outer margin of apical 1/3, extending into middle of dorsal surface, basally widened; ventral part ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) slender, with teeth at inner margin.
Color variation. Some individuals have a black-margined elytra and a black metasternum and metepisternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ).
Type materials examined. The lectotype 3 of Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô , here designated to preserve stability and to make more universal use of this name, is labeled: “ Formosa. Musha (= Wushe, Nantou), 1919. V.18 – VI.15, T. Okuni / CoType / Monolepta gracilipes CHÛJÔ DET. M. Chujo / 1475” ( TARI); paralectotypes: 33 (1472, 1474, 1480), 2ƤƤ (1473, 1488), with same data as lectotype ( TARI), one paralectotype with same data deposited at the DEI; 13 (1471), 1Ƥ (2582): “ Formosa Arisan (= Alishan, Chiai), 1918. X.2 – 23, J. Sonan ( TARI); 13 (1481): “Ritozan (= Litungshan, Taoyuan), 31.VII.1928, S. Issiki, 13 (1353), 1Ƥ (1354): “ INOUE (= Chingchuan, Hsinchu), FORMOSA, 21.VII.1935 COL. M. Chujo” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (2583): “ Formosa, Shinchiku (= Hsinchu), 1918. VII.1–30, J. Sonan” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (1476): “Taiheizan (= Taipingshan, Ilan), 25.VIII.1923, Col. T. Shiraki” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (1489): “Kobayashi (= Hiaolin, Kaohsiung), 25.VII.1929, Formosa, Y. Miwa” ( TARI); 13 (1478): “Shikiku (= Sunchitsun, Ilan), 3.XI.2928, Col. J. Sonan” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (1479): “Nokosan (= Nengkaoshan, Nantou), 11.V.1919, Okuni, Sonan” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (2584): “Nishimura (= Hsitsun, Miaoli), 24.VII.1929, Formosa, Y. Miwa” ( TARI); 1Ƥ (1477): “Nankotaizan (= Nanhutashan, Taichung), 31-X-1928, Col. J. Sonan” ( TARI).
Specimens examined. 53, 5ƤƤ (#6095-6104), Taipei, Lengshuikeng, 22.VI.2008, leg. S.-F. Yu; 1 Ƥ (#6436), Taipei, Sanchih, 30.VI.2008, W.-T. Liu; 1Ƥ (#432), Taipei, Tienmu, 08.XII.2006, leg. S.-F. Yu; 1Ƥ (#2322), Taoyuan, Tungyanshan, 08.VII.2007, leg. S.-F. Yu; 1Ƥ (#6945), Taoyuan, Tamanshan, 03.VIII.2008, leg. M.-H. Tsao; 13 (#6142), Hsinchu, Lupi, 24.VI.2008, leg. H. Lee; 23 (#6733-6734), 2ƤƤ (#6732, 6736), same locality, 19.VII.2008, leg. M.-H. Tsao; 23, 1Ƥ, (#6737-6739), same data but with 20.VII.2008; 4ƤƤ (#6814-6815, 6817-6818), same data but with 26.VII.2008; 1Ƥ (#2759), Pingtung, Tahanshan, 18.VII.2007, leg. M.-H. Tsao; 13, same locality, 20.VII.2007, leg. C.-F. Lee; 33, 7ƤƤ, Taitung, Tajen, 17.IX.2008, leg. W.-C. Wang; 1Ƥ (#4508), Taitung, Taimali, 20.III.2008, leg. P.-F. Wang. (all in TARI)
Notes. The Taiwanese population was recorded firstly as Luperodes pallidulus Baly, 1874 by Chûjô (1935). It was transferred to the genus Monolepta Chevrolat by Chûjô (1938). At the meantime, he described those specimens with black-margined elytra as a new species: M. gracilipes Chûjô, 1938 . Kimoto (1969) regarded these as a color variation of M. pallidula . Actually, the Taiwanese population is a distinct species with color variation which is different from the uniform M. pallidula (see below). Since M. gracilipes is an available name, it should be reinstated.
Diagnosis. This species is close to Monolepta pallidula with the yellowish-brown body and similar endophallus, but differing by the wide and truncate apex of median lobe, relatively wider dorso-ventrally median lobe ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17 – 20 ), the narrowed anterior area of middle part of spermatheca ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 20 ), the more prominent-toothed and narrow-based dorsal bursa sclerites ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 20 ), and the ventral bursa sclerites with more and fine teeth. ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 20 ). In addition, Monolepta gracilipes displays color variation on the elytra and metasternum in contrast with no color variation in M. pallidula .
Distribution. Taiwan. This species seems to be the most common species of Monolepta in Taiwan based on lots of records and field experiences of the senior author.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938
Lee, Chi-Feng 2009 |
Monolepta pallidula Chûjô, 1938 : 144
Takizawa 1995: 11 |
Kimoto 1991: 14 |
Kimoto 1989: 256 |
Kimoto 1987: 189 |
Kimoto 1986: 58 |
Kimoto 1969: 47 |
Kimoto 1966: 32 |
Chujo 1965: 97 |
Kimoto 1965: 488 |
Chujo 1963: 25 |
Chujo 1963: 393 |
Chujo 1962: 123 |
Chujo 1938: 144 |
Monolepta gracilipes Chûjô, 1938 : 145
Kimoto 1986: 58 |
Kimoto 1969: 47 |
Chujo 1965: 97 |
Chujo 1962: 132 |
Chujo 1938: 145 |
Luperodes pallidulus Chûjô, 1935 : 162
Chujo 1935: 162 |