Camillina kuarup, Xavier & Ott & Saturnino, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B0A0C91F-460C-413E-B20A-18D1C4B3D695 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/29240140-F1E4-4822-A087-64080DEA0D6C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:29240140-F1E4-4822-A087-64080DEA0D6C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Camillina kuarup |
status |
sp. nov. |
Camillina kuarup View in CoL sp. nov.
Figures 8–14 View FIGURES 8–14 ; 36–49 View FIGURES 36-43 View FIGURES 44–49 ; 67 View FIGURES 64–71 , 72 View FIGURE 72 .
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:29240140-F1E4-4822-A087-64080DEA0D6C
Type material. Holotype: 1♂ ( MPEG 31016 View Materials ) from Fazenda Tanguro, 12°35’49”S 52°11’59”W, Querência, Mato Grosso, Brazil, D.F. Candiani & N.F. Lo-Man-Hung leg GoogleMaps . Paratypes: same locality as the holotype, 12°53’28”S 52°22’25”W, 1♀ ( MPEG 31017 View Materials ), 14–21. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 13°04’25.3”S 52° 22’42.9”W, 1♂ ( IBSP 250385 View Materials ), 05.VI– 12. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31025 View Materials ), 12–19. VI.2006; 12°53’28.04”S 52°22’25”W; 1♂ ( IBSP 250386 View Materials ), 05.VI– 12. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31021 View Materials ), 12–19. VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31029 View Materials ), 14–21. VI.2006; 1♂ ( MNRJ 7684 View Materials ), 31. V.2006; 13°04’25.1”S 52°23’15.2”W, 1♂ ( MNRJ 7683 View Materials ), 12–19. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31026 View Materials ), 14–21. VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31030 View Materials ), 29.V–05. VI.2006; same data, 1♂ ( CHNUFPI 3395 ); 1♂ ( CHNUFPI 3396 ), 31. V.2006; 13°04’25.2”S 52°22’59.7”W, 1♂ ( MPEG 31028 View Materials ), 12–19. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 1♂ ( MPEG 31033 View Materials ), 29.V–05. VI.2006; 13°04’25.3”S 52°22’42.9”W, 1♂ ( MPEG 31032 View Materials ), 29.V–05. GoogleMaps VI.2006; 12°49’55”S 52°20’21.6”W, 1♂ ( MPEG 31038 View Materials ), 31. GoogleMaps V.2006; 12°53’28.04”S 52°22’25”W, 1♂ ( MPEG 30987 View Materials ), 07–14. GoogleMaps VI.2006; all specimens were collected by D.F. Candiani & N.F. Lo-Man-Hung in pitfall traps.
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to a ritual tribute to the illustrious dead celebrated by the indigenous people of the Xingu.
Diagnosis. Males of Camillina kuarup resemble those of C. tarapaca Platnick & Shadab, 1982 , by the shape of the embolus, but differ from the last by a larger retrolateral tibial apophysis and a robuster U-shaped spermatic duct positioned along the border of the tegulum ( Figs 10–12 View FIGURES 8–14 ; 44–49 View FIGURES 44–49 ), while in C. tarapaca the duct has a sinuous loop in the prolateral portion of the tegulum, and the retrolateral tibial apophysis has a narrower tip (see Platnick & Shadab, 1982: figs 91, 92). Females resemble those of C. tarapaca , by the position of the secondary spermathecae, but differ from the last by a longer and wider median field with shorter copulatory ducts and a larger spermathecae relative to the median field width which are also located closer to the median field ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURES 8–14 ; Platnick & Shadab, 1982: figs 93, 94).
Description. Male (Holotype). Carapace brown with darker stripes, convergent and not continuous in the direction of the thoracic groove ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–14 ); thoracic groove dark brown ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–14 ); chelicerae brown ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–14 ) with fangs that are pale brown with dark brown laterals. Endites pale brown with apex pale yellow. Labium brown. Sternum orange with brown margins. Trochanters and coxae orange; femora, patellae and tibiae I and II dark brown; femora, patellae and tibiae III and IV mostly dark brown, with orange parts; metatarsi and tarsi orange. Abdomen dark gray with scutum brown, venter gray. Epigastric area yellowish on the sides and pale brown in the middle. Two parallel horizontal black spots interrupted in the middle close to the spinnerets. Carapace suboval, cephalic region narrower, and posterior region truncate ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–14 ). Sternum longer than wide. Labium longer than wide. Abdomen elliptical, longer than wide, with subtriangular scutum covering the anterior portion. Preening comb on metatarsi III and IV. Total length, not including spinnerets, 2.45. Carapace 1.11 long, 0.75 wide, 0.58 high. Abdomen 1.69 long, 0.99 wide, 0.81 high, micro granulated and bristly, with bristles larger on the anterior margin. Clypeus low, 0.05. Eye sizes: AME 0.04, ALE 0.06, PME 0.06, PLE 0.05, MOQ 0.18 length, 0.13 anterior width, 0.14 posterior width. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.02, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.01, PME–PLE 0.03, AME–PME 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.03. Chelicerae 0.40 long, 0.17 wide, with three teeth on the promarginal furrow and three on the retromarginal furrow. Leg measurements: I 2.82 (0.82, 0.42, 0.69, 0.51, 0.38); II 2.32 (0.67, 0.40, 0.53, 0.40, 0.32); III 1.92 (0.51, 0.30, 0.38, 0.43, 0.31); IV 2.86 (0.82, 0.36, 0.68, 0.62, 0.37). Leg formula IV-I-II-III. Leg spination: Leg I—femur d 1-1-0, p 0, r 0, v 0; tibia d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0; metatarsus d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0. II—femur d 1-1-0, p 0, r 0; tibia d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0; metatarsus d 0, p 0, r 0, v 1-0-0. III—femur d 1-1-0, p 0-0-d1, r 1-1-0; tibia d p1r1-0, p 1-1, r 0-1, v 2-2-2; metatarsus d 0-2-2, p 0-v1-1, r 0-1-1, v 0. IV—femur d 1-1-0, p 0, r 0, v0; tibia d0, p 1-1, r 1-1, v 2-2-2; metatarsus d 0-1-1, p 0-2-2, r 1-2-2, v 2-1-0. Palp: tibia longer than wide; RTA subretangular almost with the same size of tibia with a small and large extension on the apical prolateral margin; embolus short, subretangular.
Female (Paratype from Querência, Mato Grosso, Brazil; MPEG 31017). Coloration as in male, except when noted. Carapace pale brown with darker, convergent and not continuous stripes in the direction of the thoracic groove ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8–14 ), thoracic groove brown ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8–14 ), chelicerae brown ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8–14 ) with fangs pale brown; sternum orange with dark brown margins and larger than in males. Shape of sternum, labium and abdomen as in male, except for the absence of scutum in the abdomen. Epigastric area with a median circular white spot close to the spinnerets. Preening comb on metatarsi III and IV. Total length, not including spinnerets, 3.36. Carapace 1.38 long, 1.03 wide, 0.48 high, micro granulated and bristly, bristles larger on the clypeus. Abdomen 1.64 long, 0.98 wide, 0.82 high, micro granulated and bristly, with bristles larger on the anterior margin. Clypeus low, 0.06. Eye sizes: AME 0.05, ALE 0.05, PME 0.05, PLE 0.05, MOQ 0.17 length, 0.13 anterior width, 0.14 posterior width. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.03, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.01, PME–PLE 0.02, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.04. Chelicerae 0.38 long, 0.17 wide, with three teeth on the promarginal furrow and three on the retromarginal furrow. Leg measurements: I 3.33 (0.88, 0.53, 0.81, 0.64, 0.48); II 2.91 (0.90, 0.42, 0.63, 0.51, 0.45); III 2.50 (0.69, 0.35, 0.51, 0.54, 0.41); IV 3.75 (1.07, 0.48, 0.88, 0.88, 0.44). Leg formula IV-I-II-III. Leg spination. Leg I—femur d 1-1-0, p 0- 0-1, r 0-0-1, v0; tibia d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0; metatarsus d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0. II—femur d 1-1-0, p 0, r 0, v 0; tibia d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0; metatarsus d 0, p 0, r 0, v 0. III—femur d 1-1-0, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1, v 0; tibia d 0, p 2-1, r 1-1, v 1-2-2; metatarsus d 0-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-1-2, r 0-1-1, v 1-0-0. IV—femur d 1-1-0, p 0, r 0-0-d1; tibia d 0, p 1-1, r 1-1, v 1-2-2; metatarsus d 0, p 1-2-2, r 1-2-1, v 2-1-0. Epigynum: median field subtriangular, smaller than the primary spermathecae; small copulatory ducts arranged inclined to the anterior margin; primary spermathecae robust and globular, close to the median field.
Other material examined. BRAZIL: Mato Grosso: 1♂, Querência, Fazenda Tanguro , 12°49’55”S 52°20’21.6”W, 29.V–05.VI.2006 ( MPEG 31036 View Materials —SEM sample) GoogleMaps .
Variation. Length (10♂) total 3.09–3.79, carapace 1.35–1.76, femur I 0.87–1.34.
Distribution. Northeastern part of the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Life history and habitat preferences. The same of C. suya.
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |