Galeopsomyia, Girault, 1916

Hansson, Christer & Hanson, Paul E., 2023, EULOPHIDAE OF COSTA RICA (HYMENOPTERA: CHALCIDOIDEA), 5: The genus Galeopsomyia Girault, Taxonomic Monographs on Neotropical Hymenoptera (Oxford, England) 3 (1), pp. 1-743 : 16-54

KEY TO FEMALES OF GALEOPSOMYIA

1. Antenna with apical two flagellomeres predominantly to completely yellowish-white or yellowish-brown ( Figs 730, 731 , 761 )......................................................2

– Antenna with apical two flagellomeres brown to black, or entire antenna yellowish-brown.............................................................................................................4

2 (1) Fore and hind coxae predominantly black and ±metallic ( Fig. 327 ) .................... ................................................................. carballoi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 264)

– Fore coxa usually white and hind coxa always white ( Figs 233, 235 ) ...............3

3 (2) Antenna long ( Fig. 730 ), flagellum+pedicel 1.6× as long as width of mesoscutum, F3 3.0× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with frenal groove very wide ( Fig. 232 ) ...................................................... admirabilis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 184)

– Antenna shorter ( Fig. 731 ), flagellum+pedicel 1.5× as long as width of mesoscutum, F3 2.2× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with frenal groove narrow ( Fig. 234 ) ................................................................... insignis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 186)

4 (1) Mesoscutellum with two pairs of setae, one pair close to posterior margin and one pair in median or anterior part, with submedian grooves usually weak and indistinct (grooves absent, or distinct in a few species), wide apart and ±parallel with lateral margins of mesoscutellum (e.g. Fig. 114 ) (mainly species-group haemon ).......................................................................................... Subkey A

– Mesoscutellum usually with at least three scattered setae on parts lateral to submedian grooves, or completely covered with setae, if with two pairs of setae then with distinct and ±parallel submedian grooves on mesoscutellum ...............5

5 (4) Fore wing speculum missing, this part completely setose ( Figs 588, 589 ) ........6

– Fore wing speculum present (as in Fig. 307 )......................................................7

6 (5) Large species, 3.5–4.1mm; gaster 4.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 588 ); mesoscutum and mesoscutellum metallic ( Fig. 588 ) ............ piperae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 446)

– Small species, 1.2mm; gaster 1.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 642 ); mesoscutum and mesoscutellum dark brown non-metallic ( Fig. 642 ) ....................................... ................................................................... curiosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 484)

7 (5) Petiole and petiole attachment area on Gt 1 yellowish-brown ( Fig. 214 ); pronotum long, with ±parallel sides ( Fig. 214 ); antenna long and slender, pedicel+flagellum 1.4–2.0× as long as width of mesoscutum (mainly species-group lasallei ).... ........................................................................................................ Subkey B

– Petiole and petiole attachment area on Gt 1 usually brown to metallic, if yellowish-brown (few species) then either mesoscutum covered with setae, or pronotum or antennae shorter ........................................................................................8

8 (7) Fore wing with two infuscate spots, one around and below stigmal vein and one weaker spot at upper-apical margin ( Fig. 307 ) ................................................ ............................................................. bimaculata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 250)

– Fore wing completely hyaline, or with one infuscate spot medially or apical to stigmal vein ...................................................................................................9

9 (8) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a strong transverse carina or sharp edge dorsally and with short longitudinal carinae pointing backwards from transverse carina ( Fig. 25 )................................................................................................................10

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with or without transverse carina/edge dorsally, but if with carina/edge then without short longitudinal carinae pointing backwards from carina/edge ..................................................................................................17

10 (9) Mesoscutellum with strong reticulation and rugosity, without submedian grooves, midlobe of mesoscutum and mesoscutellum ±evenly covered with setae ( Fig. 628 )..............................................................................................................11

– Mesoscutellum with different sculpture and/or submedian grooves present, midlobe of mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with median part without setae ..........12

11 (10) Mesoscutellum with a median narrow stripe without setae and with different sculpture from remaining parts of mesoscutellum ( Fig. 636 ) .................................. ................................................................ papillosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 480)

– Mesoscutellum with uniform sculpture and setation ( Fig. 628 ) ........................... ................................................................. capillosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 474)

12 (10) Gaster 3.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 688 ) ................................................................. ...................................................... macaxeira Perioto , Costa & Lara (p. 199)

– Gaster 1.8–2.5× as long as wide .......................................................................13

13 (12) Flagellum long and slender, 1.2–1.3× as long as width of mesoscutum, and F3 1.7–2.3× as long as wide .............................................................................14

– Flagellum shorter and more stout, 1.0–1.1× as long as width of mesoscutum, and F3 1.0–1.3× as long as wide........................................................................16

14 (13) Thoracic dorsum black non-metallic ( Fig. 240 ) ................................................... .................................................................... morula Hansson sp.nov. (p. 397)

– Thoracic dorsum with metallic blue tinges.......................................................15

15 (14) Gaster 2.5× as long as wide with weak reticulation ( Fig. 246 ) ............................. ........................................................................ actis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 211)

– Gaster 1.9× as long as wide with strong reticulation ( Fig. 574 ) ........................... ........................................................................ pava Hansson sp.nov. (p. 437)

16 (13) Midlobe of mesoscutum with scattered setae, apart from a narrow bare median stripe ( Fig. 568 ); lateral parts of mesoscutellum with coarse irregular sculpture ( Fig. 923 ) .................................................... palotis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 433)

– Midlobe of mesoscutum with setae confined to parts close to notauli ( Fig. 660 ); lateral parts of mesoscutellum with reticulation ( Fig. 660 ) ............................ .................................................................................... fausta LaSalle (p. 197)

17 (9) Mesoscutellum with three complete longitudinal carinae medially, without submedian grooves ( Fig. 930 ); gaster circular, 1.1–1.3× as long as wide; with weak reticulation, Gt 1 large, covers half of gaster length ( Figs 640, 642 ) ...........18

– Mesoscutellum without three longitudinal carinae medially, submedian grooves present or absent; gaster usually longer and Gt 1 smaller.............................19

18 (17) Petiole black ................................................. aspratilis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 482)

– Petiole yellowish-brown ................................. curiosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 484)

19 (17) Mesoscutellum completely rugose, without submedian grooves ( Fig. 638 ), or grooves indistinct ( Fig. 598 ) .......................................................................20

– Mesoscutellum at least partly with different sculpture than rugosity (usually with reticulation) and/or submedian grooves ±distinct (e.g. Fig. 420 ) ...............23

20 (19) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum golden-green with blue tinges ( Fig. 598 ); gaster 2.3× as long as wide with strong reticulation ( Fig. 598 ) ................................. .................................................................... rugosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 453)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum black or metallic purple; gaster 1.6–1.7× as long as wide, reticulation variable.......................................................................21

21 (20) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum uniformly setose ( Fig. 638 ), mesoscutellum without any trace of submedian grooves ( Fig. 638 ) ..................................................... ................................................................. scabiosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 481)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with median part bare, mesoscutellum with submedian grooves present, either distinct, or indicated but weak ..................22

22 (21) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with distinct median groove ( Fig. 448 ); mesoscutellum with submedian grooves more apart, median part 3.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 448 ) ................................................... ladrona Hansson sp.nov. (p. 350)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum without median groove ( Fig. 630 ); mesoscutellum with submedian grooves closer, median part 5.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 630 ) ....................................................................... gobis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 476)

23 (19) Midlobe of mesoscutum ±uniformly covered with setae ( Figs 632, 634 ) ........24

– Midlobe of mesoscutum with setae confined to parts close to notauli, with median part bare.......................................................................................................25

24 (23) Mesoscutellum with three setae on lateral parts ( Fig. 632 ); submedian grooves more apart, width of median part 1.6× as wide as width of lateral parts (measured medially) ..................................................... hirsuta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 477)

– Mesoscutellum with lateral parts ±uniformly setose ( Fig. 634 ); submedian grooves closer, width of median part 0.6× as wide as width of lateral parts (measured medially) ......................................................... hirta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 478)

25 (23) Midlobe of mesoscutum with large piliferous punctures ( Figs 644, 646 ); petiole yellowish-brown..........................................................................................26

– Midlobe of mesoscutum without piliferous punctures; colour of petiole variable .....................................................................................................................27

26 (25) Antenna short (Fig. 1104), length/width F1 1.6, F2 1.4, F3 1.3 ........................... .................................................................. alveolus Hansson sp.nov. (p. 485)

– Antenna long (Fig. 1105), length/width F1 2.0, F2 1.8, F3 1.8 ............................ ....................................................................... asilis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 486)

27 (25) Mesoscutellum completely flat ( Fig. 582, 583 ), mesoscutellum, dorsellum and propodeum in same plane ................. philodendrae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 442)

– Mesoscutellum, dorsellum and propodeum not in same plane, if mesoscutellum and dorsellum are in same plane then propodeum is distinctly sloping.............28

28 (27) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves straight and strongly diverging towards posterior part ( Fig. 420 ), distance between submedian grooves at posterior margin of mesoscutellum at least twice the distance between submedian grooves at anterior margin ............................................................................................29

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves straight or curved, parallel or diverging slightly towards posterior part, distance between submedian grooves at posterior margin of mesoscutellum less than twice the distance between submedian grooves at anterior margin...........................................................................30

29 (28) Mesoscutellum transverse and ±flattened, 0.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 420 ); mesoscutum and lateral parts of mesoscutellum with strong reticulation with ±isodiametric meshes ( Fig. 420 ); propodeum with strong reticulation but without irregular carinae ( Fig. 420 ) ............................ hiata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 330)

– Mesoscutellum 1.1× as long as wide and convex ( Fig. 472 ); mesoscutum and lateral parts of mesoscutellum with weaker reticulation than in alternate, with elongate meshes ( Fig. 472 ); propodeum with strong irregular carinae and strong reticulation ( Fig. 472 ) ........................................... macanis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 366)

30 (28) Hind coxa with a carina along posterior margin (as in Fig. 21 )........... Subkey C

– Hind coxa without carina along posterior margin.............................................31

31 (30) Antennal flagellum short, pedicel+flagellum 0.7–0.8× as long as width of mesoscutum, and with a short and ovate clava (Fig. 1054) ..................................32

– Antennal flagellum longer and clava more elongate.........................................33

32 (31) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a strong transverse carina dorsally (as in Figs 24 , 42 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum with outer margin ±distinct ( Fig. 236 ); fore wing completely hyaline ( Fig. 237 ) .... blendis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 190)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum with outer margin absent ( Fig. 404 ); fore wing with an infuscate spot medially ( Fig. 405 ) ............................ globosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 318)

33 (31) Apex of gonoplac blunt in lateral view (e.g. Fig. 431 ); body usually non-metallic black to dark brown, occasionally metallic.....................................Subkey D

– Apex of gonoplac pointed (e.g. Fig. 429 ), gonoplac can be very short but still pointed; body colour variable......................................................................34

34 (33) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves with outer margins distinct, grooves subdivided by several transverse carinae ( Fig. 924 ); non-metallic species, petiole yellowish-brown ( Fig. 230 ) ..................... anomala Hansson sp.nov. (p. 189)

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves with outer margins partly to completely indistinct, or not subdivided by transverse carinae, or metallic; colour of petiole variable........................................................................................................35

35 (34) Fore wing with an infuscate spot apical to stigmal vein ( Fig. 311 ); mesoscutellum and gaster with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 310 ); small species (1.5 mm).. ....................................................................... boria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 253)

– Fore wing hyaline; reticulation on mesoscutellum and gaster, and size, variable .....................................................................................................................36

36 (35) Mesoscutellum ( Fig. 915 ) with ±uniform weak reticulation and with median part wide, 2.3–2.7× as long as wide, submedian grooves parallel; body black to dark brown with weak metallic tinges.................................................................37

– Mesoscutellum with at least some part with strong reticulation or rugosity, median part variable but usually narrower than in alternate, submedian grooves and body colour variable....................................................................................40

37 (36) Petiole about 0.5× as long as wide with some strong longitudinal carinae ( Fig. 532 ); gaster ovate with apex ±blunt ( Figs 532, 533 ) ................................................ ................................................................. nebulosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 408)

– Petiole very short, just a narrow band, without longitudinal carinae; gaster elongate with apex acuminate....................................................................................38

38 (37) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 smoothly rounded dorsally (as in Fig. 23 ) ..................... .................................................................... lacinia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 349)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ) ..................39

39 (38) Mid coxa yellowish-brown ( Fig. 543 ); propodeal callus with three setae; gaster 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 542 ) .................... nitida Hansson sp.nov. (p. 415)

– Mid coxa black and metallic ( Fig. 529 ); propodeal callus with 6–7 setae; gaster 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 528 ) .................... navia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 405)

40 (36) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum with outer margin predominantly indistinct (e.g. Fig. 412 ) and antennal clava with a distinct constriction between C1 and C2 (as in Fig. 38 )............................................................................ Subkey E

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum with outer margin distinct in at least posterior half and / or antennal clava solid or with a weak constriction .....................41

41 (40) Antennal clava with a distinct constriction between C1 and C2 (as in Fig. 38 )... ........................................................................................................ Subkey F

– Antennal clava solid (as in Fig. 37 ), or with a weak constriction between C1 and C2 (e.g. Fig. 741 ) ........................................................................................42

42 (41) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves with outer margin predominantly indistinct (e.g. Fig. 918 ) ................................................................................. Subkey G

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves with outer margin distinct in at least posterior ½ (e.g. Fig. 459 ) ................................................................................43

43 (42) Genal carina absent ...........................................................................................44

– Genal carina present, sometimes short and present only close to mouth opening .....................................................................................................................50

44 (43) Hind coxa with a short longitudinal carina close to base ( Fig. 359 ) ..................... ................................................................. crotonae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 287)

– Hind coxa without longitudinal carina close to base ........................................45

45 (44) Mesoscutellum elongate, 1.3× as long as wide (e.g. Fig. 458 ); thoracic dorsum bright golden-green or metallic bluish-green (e.g. Fig. 458 ) ......................46

– Mesoscutellum 0.9–1.2× as long as wide; thoracic dorsum less metallic, if bright metallic then mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide .....................................47

46 (45) Antenna with pedicel and flagellum dark brown ( Fig. 665 ); fore coxa golden-green ( Fig. 665 ) ................................................ nicaraguaensis (Cameron) (p. 202)

– Antenna with pedicel and flagellum pale brown ( Fig. 812 ); fore coxa yellowish-brown to pale brown ( Fig. 459 ) ................. lemuris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 357)

47 (45) Propodeal callus with 2 setae............................................................................48

– Propodeal callus with 5–10 setae......................................................................49

48 (47) Antennal flagellum short ( Fig. 790 ), pedicel+flagellum 0.8× as long as width of head, with clava short, 2.2× as long as wide, and solid; mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 390 ) ......................... fernandezi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 309)

– Antennal flagellum longer ( Fig. 823 ), pedicel+flagellum 1.1× as long as width of head, with clava elongate, 3.2× as long as wide, with weak constriction between C1 and C2; mesoscutellum 1.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 476 ) ........................... ..................................................................... magra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 369)

49 (47) Propodeal callus with 10 setae; gonoplac yellowish-brown ( Fig. 681 ) ................ ....................................................................... transcarinata (Gahan) (p. 206)

– Propodeal callus with 6 setae; gonoplac dark brown to black ( Fig. 657 ) ............. ............................................................................ deilochus (Walker) (p. 195)

50 (43) Genal carina short, from mouth opening but does not reach level of lower margin of eye (as in Fig. 16 )....................................................................... Subkey H

– Genal carina reaching from mouth opening to at least level of lower margin of eye (as in Fig. 17 ) ..............................................................................................51

51 (50) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves ±straight and ±parallel (e.g. Fig. 410 ). .....................................................................................................................52

– Mesoscutellum either with submedian grooves not straight, or diverging posteriorly ..............................................................................................................58

52 (51) Mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide and ±flattened ( Fig. 410 )........................53

– Mesoscutellum 1.0–1.1× as long as wide and more convex ( Fig. 616 )............54

53 (52) Gaster long ovate ( Fig. 410 ), 1.9× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with metallic blue tinges ( Fig. 410 ) ......................... graciliclava Hansson sp.nov. (p. 323)

– Gaster short ovate ( Fig. 374 ), 1.6× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with metallic purple tinges ( Fig. 374 ) ................................. elisia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 298)

54 (52) Gaster 3.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 616 ) .......... ventrosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 465)

– Gaster 1.4–2.2× as long as wide .......................................................................55

55 (54) Gaster 2.1–2.2× as long as wide .......................................................................56

– Gaster 1.4–1.5× as long as wide .......................................................................57

56 (55) Mesoscutellum with more elongate meshes ( Fig. 608 ) and with median part 2.2× as wide as lateral parts (measured medially); dorsellum with sparse irregular sculpture and shiny; gastral tergites with stronger reticulation ( Fig. 608 ), medio-basal Gt 1 with a ±sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ) .......... .................................................................... triozae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 460)

– Mesoscutellum with less elongate meshes ( Fig. 278 ) and with median part 2.0× as wide as lateral parts (measured medially); dorsellum with dense strong reticulation and relatively dull; gastral tergites with weaker reticulation ( Fig. 278 ), medio-basal Gt 1 without a sharp edge dorsally (as in Fig. 23 ) ........................ ...................................................................... apicis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 231)

57 (55) Median part of mesoscutellum with strong reticulation ( Fig. 284 ); antennal clava 4.3× as long as wide (Fig. 1061) ......... arenalicola Hansson sp.nov. (p. 235)

– Median part of mesoscutellum with weak reticulation ( Fig. 606 ); antennal clava 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 873 ) ................ tigrensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 458)

58 (51) Median part of mesoscutellum with strong reticulation or strong rugosity, at least in anterior ½, but usually throughout ..........................................................59

– Median part of mesoscutellum predominantly or completely with weak reticulation...............................................................................................................69

59 (58) Gaster very long ( Fig. 580 ), 3.4× as long as wide ................................................ ....................................................................... perla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 441)

– Gaster 1.5–3.0× as long as wide .......................................................................60

60 (59) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves close ( Fig. 594 ), ratio width of median part/width of lateral part (measured medially) = 0.9 ....................................... ................................................................ reticulata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 450)

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves further apart, ratio width of median part/ width of lateral part (measured medially) = 1.1–2.2...................................61

61 (60) Body predominantly black with metallic tinges on head and mesosoma ( Fig. 510 ); gaster 1.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 510 ) ........... miria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 392)

– Body predominantly metallic; gaster 1.6–3.0× as long as wide .......................62

62 (61) Gonoplac long, 1.0× as long as hind femur ( Fig. 361 ) ......................................... .............................................................. cuscoensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 289)

– Gonoplac shorter than hind femur ....................................................................63

63 (62) Mesoscutellum with a weak and incomplete median groove ........................... 64

– Mesoscutellum with a strong and complete median groove.............................65

64 (63) More metallic species ( Fig. 300 ); antennal flagellum dark brown ( Fig. 750 ); femora with basal half metallic ( Fig. 301 ) ............ beltanis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 246)

– Less metallic species ( Fig. 572 ); antennal flagellum yellowish-brown ( Fig. 673 ); femora pale yellowish-brown ( Fig. 673 ).............. flavipes (Howard) (p. 198)

65 (63) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ) ..... .....................................................................................................................66

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without a sharp transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 23 ) .....................................................................................................................67

66 (65) Gaster 1.8× as long as wide with very strong reticulation on tergites ( Fig. 560 ). .................................................................. osaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 427)

– Gaster 2.6–2.8× as long as wide with weaker reticulation on tergites ( Fig. 388 ). ........................................................................ falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

67 (65) Propodeal callus with 2 setae ...................................... sulcata (Howard) (p. 205)

– Propodeal callus with 3–5 setae ........................................................................68

68 (67) Gaster 1.9× as long as wide with strong reticulation ( Fig. 248 ) ........................... .................................................................... adobia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 212)

– Gaster 2.6–2.8× as long as wide with weak reticulation ( Fig. 388 ) ...................... ........................................................................ falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

69 (58) Gonoplac long, 1.0× as long as length of hind femur ( Fig. 619 ) .......................... .............................................................. verbesinae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 467)

– Gonoplac shorter than hind femur ....................................................................70

70 (69) Gt 2–4 with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 388 ) ......................................................71

– Gt 2–4 with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 342 ) .....................................................72

71 (70) Bright metallic species ( Fig. 388 ); gaster 2.6–2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 388 ) ... ........................................................................ falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

– More dull species ( Fig. 332 ); gaster 2.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 332 ) ................... ................................................................ cecropiae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 269)

72 (70) Antenna shorter ( Fig. 667 ), e.g. clava 1.8× as long as wide ................................. ................................................................................ scadius (Walker) (p. 204)

– Antenna longer, e.g. clava 2.8–4.4× as long as wide........................................73

73 (72) Gonoplac dark brown ( Fig. 343 ) ............... coccolobae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 277)

– Gonoplac black .................................................................................................74

74 (73) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum strongly diverging towards posterior part ( Fig. 544 ), ratio distance between submedian grooves anteriorly/posteriorly = 0.67, median part of mesoscutellum 3.1× as long as wide; hind femur 4.7× as long as wide ............................................... noblitis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 417)

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum weakly diverging towards posterior part, ratio distance between submedian grooves anteriorly/posteriorly = 0.79–0.86, median part of mesoscutellum 2.6–2.9× as long as wide; hind femur 3.9–4.5× as long as wide ............................................................................................75

75 (74) Gaster short ovate ( Fig. 372 ), 1.6× as long as wide .............................................. ...................................................................... edera Hansson sp.nov. (p. 297)

– Gaster 2.1–2.5× as long as wide .......................................................................76

76 (75) Mesosoma black with weak metallic tinges ( Fig. 260 ) ......................................... .................................................................... aliante Hansson sp.nov. (p. 220)

– Mesosoma golden-green or metallic bluish-green............................................77

77 (76) Antennal flagellomeres shorter ( Fig. 872 ), F2 and F3 each 1.3×, and clava 2.7× as long as wide ................................................ triozae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 460)

– Antennal flagellomeres longer, F2 1.7–2.0× and F3 1.7–1.9×, and clava 3.3–4.4× as long as wide ............................................................................................78

78 (77) Mesoscutellum with a strong and complete median groove ( Fig. 388 ) ................ ........................................................................ falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

– Mesoscutellum with a weak and incomplete median groove ( Fig. 356 ) .............. .................................................................. criniera Hansson sp.nov. (p. 286)

Subkey A

A1 [4] Antenna with funiculars yellowish-brown, contrasting against dark brown pedicel (Fig. 1017) ...................................................... gala Hansson sp.nov. (p. 107)

– Antenna with different colour combination of funiculars and pedicel ...............2

A2 (1) Antennal flagellum very long ( Fig. 679 ), e.g. F1 about 8× as long as wide......... ........................................................................ persimilis (Ashmead) (p. 188)

– Antennal flagellum shorter, F1 at most 2.5× as long as wide .............................3

A3 (2) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves ±distinct and ±parallel (e.g. Fig. 238 ). .......................................................................................................................4

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves indistinct or missing, if present then distinctly diverging posteriorly ..........................................................................5

A4 (3) Gaster with dorsal part of medio-basal part of Gt 1 smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ); dark brown to black non-metallic species ( Fig. 238 ) ...................................... ..................................................................... maura Hansson sp.nov. (p. 191)

– Gaster with dorsal part of medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a strong transverse and sharp carina (as in Fig. 42 ); metallic species ( Fig. 236 ) ........................................... .................................................................... blendis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 190)

A5 (3) Entire body black non-metallic ( Fig. 377 )......... nigrocyanea (Ashmead) (p. 58)

– Body metallic, or if predominantly black then with metallic tinges...................6

A6 (5) Genal carina absent, this part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 15 ).........................7

– Genal carina present (as in Figs 16, 17 )............................................................26

A7 (6) Antennal clava with a distinct constriction between C1 and C2 (Fig. 1006) ....... ................................................................ copalensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 88)

– Antennal clava solid, or with a weak constriction ..............................................8

A8 (7) Mouth opening very wide, 1.5× as wide as malar space (Fig. 1024) ................... ............................................................ larshuggerti Hansson sp.nov. (p. 127)

– Mouth opening 1.0–1.3× as wide as malar space ...............................................9

A9 (8) Gaster laterally flattened and narrow in dorsal view, 4.4× as long as wide, Gt 1-4 with a smooth median line ( Fig. 172 ) ................ perseae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 147)

– Gaster not laterally flattened, at most 3.3× as long as wide, Gt 1-4 reticulate, without median line ..................................................................................................10

A10 (9) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with ±rectangular incision and with an ±ovate flat and smooth area just lateral to incision (as in Fig. 43 ) ......................................11

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with ±semicircular incision, or without incision, without ovate flat area ..............................................................................................12

A11 (10) Antenna with F1 1.9×, F2 1.4×, F3 1.3× as long as wide (Fig. 1001) .................. ................................................................. druparum Hansson sp.nov. (p. 95)

– Antenna with F1 1.3×, F2 1.0×, F3 1.0× as long as wide (Fig. 1030) .................. ..................................................................... marea Hansson sp.nov. (p. 136)

A12 (10) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse edge dorsally (as in Figs 24 , 42 ) ....13

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without a transverse edge or carina dorsally, this part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) ................................................................17

A13 (12) Gt 1 with very strong reticulation throughout ( Fig. 186 ) ....................................... .......................................................... santarosensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 156)

– Gt 1 partly with relatively weak reticulation to smooth .....................................14

A14 (13) Gt 4 2.8× as long as Gt 2 ( Fig. 124 ) ............. herediensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 116)

– Gt 4 6.3–8.7× as long as Gt 2 ...............................................................................15

A15 (14) Propodeum with narrow anterior part of median carina (not including posterior expanded part) very short about 1.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 98 ) ..................... .................................................................. eberhardi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 98)

– Propodeum with narrow anterior part of median carina (not including posterior expanded part) 3–5× as long as wide ..........................................................16

A16 (15) Propodeum with narrow anterior part of median carina (i.e. not including posterior expanded part) about 3× as long as wide with sides diverging towards posterior part ( Fig. 180 ); petiole black ........................................................................... ................................................ ramyamanjunathae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 152)

– Propodeum with narrow anterior part of median carina about 5× as long as wide with sides parallel ( Fig. 188 ); petiole dark yellowish-brown .......................... .............................................................. seminarum Hansson sp.nov. (p. 157)

A17 (12) Gt 2 very short, about 0.06× as long as Gt 4 ( Fig. 56 )..........................................18

– Gt 2 0.2–0.3× as long as Gt 4 ...............................................................................19

A18 (17) Gt 3-6 with stronger and more large-meshed reticulation ( Fig. 56 ); gaster 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 56 ) ......................................... azofeifai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 69)

– Gt 3-6 with weaker and more small-meshed reticulation ( Fig. 56 ); gaster 3.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 56 ) ............................................. cresta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 90)

A19 (17) Gaster 3.1–3.2× as long as wide .......................................................................20

– Gaster 2.1–2.8× as long as wide .......................................................................21

A20 (19) Eyes smaller, 1.0× as long as malar space ( Fig. 887 ); head shorter, 2.4× as wide as long in dorsal view ................................................... epidius (Walker) (p. 55)

– Eyes larger, 1.6× as long as malar space ( Fig. 888 ); head longer, 2.1× as wide as long in dorsal view ......................................... rubii Hansson sp.nov. (p. 153)

A21 (19) Antenna with F1 1.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 663 ); tibiae dark brown ( Fig. 663 ); propodeal callus with eight setae ............................ haemon (Walker) (p. 57)

– Antenna with F1 1.1-1.2× as long as wide; tibiae yellowish-brown; propodeal callus with 2–3 setae..............................................................................................22

A22 (21) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves ±parallel ( Fig. 114 ) .............................. ................................................................. gallarum Hansson sp.nov. (p. 109)

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves diverging towards posterior part......23

A23 (22) Gaster 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 152 ) .......... maniata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 133)

– Gaster 2.1× as long as wide ..............................................................................24

A24 (23) Hind coxa with an incomplete and weak carina along posterior margin, present only in apical one-third ..................................... mandria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 132)

– Hind coxa with a strong and complete carina along posterior margin (as in Fig. 21 )................................................................................................................25

A25 (24) Subocular fovea large ( Fig. 906 ), 0.4× malar space, and 1.3× as wide as high (width measured just below eye) ............................. estera Hansson sp.nov. (p. 100)

– Subocular fovea small ( Fig. 905 ), 0.3× malar space, and 1.0× as wide as high (width measured just below eye) .............. manuelpereirai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 134)

A26 (6) Hind coxa with a carina along ±entire posterior margin (as in Fig. 21 ) ...........27

– Hind coxa without carina along posterior margin ( Fig. 20 ), or with a short carina at apex .........................................................................................................65

A27 (26) Antennal clava with a distinct constriction between C1 and C2 (as in Fig. 38 )... .....................................................................................................................28

– Antennal clava solid (as in Fig. 37 ), or with a weak constriction ....................32

A28 (27) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with transverse sharp edge dorsally (as in Fig. 42 ) ........ .............................................................. plaumanni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 151)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without transverse edge dorsally, this part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) ..............................................................................................29

A29 (28) Gaster 3.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 106 ) ............... fresa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 103)

– Gaster 2.2–2.8× as long as wide .......................................................................30

A30 (29) Propodeum with median carina very narrow ( Fig. 62 ), anterior narrow part (not including posterior expanded part) at least 6.0× as long as wide; Gt 1-4 with a median line (change in reticulation) ( Fig. 62 ) ................................................. .................................................................. bidensiae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 73)

– Propodeum with median carina wider, anterior narrow part 1.9–3.3× as long as wide; Gt 1-4 without a median line (no change in reticulation).....................31

A31 (30) Propodeum with anterior narrow part of median carina 3.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 192 ); gaster 2.2× as long as wide, medio-basal part of Gt 1 without incision ( Fig. 192 ) ...................................................... sureshnaiki Hansson sp.nov. (p. 160)

– Propodeum with anterior narrow part of median carina 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 148 ); gaster 2.8× as long as wide, medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a ± rectangular incision and with an ±ovate flat and smooth area just lateral to incision (as in Fig. 43 ) ......................................................... malia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 131)

A32 (27) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse blunt to sharp edge or carina dorsally (as in Figs 41, 42 )..............................................................................................33

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without a transverse edge or carina dorsally, this part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) ................................................................47

A33 (32) Gt 1-4 with a median line (change in reticulation along a narrow median part) (e.g. Fig. 46 ) ........................................................................................................34

– Gt 1-4 without median line ..................................................................................35

A34 (33) Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation ( Fig. 682 ) ................... ...................................................................... viridicyanea (Ashmead) (p. 60)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation ( Fig. 46 ) ...................... ...................................................................... aciana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 63)

A35 (33) Propodeal callus with ten setae ................ mucuriensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 143)

– Propodeal callus with 2–3 setae ........................................................................36

A36 (35) Gaster 2.0× as long as wide ..............................................................................37

– Gaster 2.5–3.6× as long as wide .......................................................................38

A37 (36) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with a median groove, mesoscutellum with submedian grooves ±distinct ( Fig. 44 ); antennal clava compact, 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 999 ) ............................................... abatis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 62)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum without a median groove, mesoscutellum with submedian grooves indistinct ( Fig. 88 ); antennal clava 2.5× as long as wide (Fig. 1009) ................................................ crucensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 91)

A38 (36) Propodeum with median carina long and narrow ( Fig. 136 ), narrow anterior part (not including posterior expanded part) about 6× as long as wide; gaster 2.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 136 ) ........................ jimenezi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 123)

– Propodeum with median carina wide, or short, narrow anterior part at most 3.3× as long as swide, or triangular; gaster 2.6–3.6× as long as wide ......................39

A39 (38) Propodeum with median carina triangular, i.e. continually expanding backwards from anterior margin and backwards (e.g. Fig. 54 ), or with narrow anterior part less than half the length of carina................................................................40

– Propodeum with median carina with narrow anterior part at least half the length of median carina ..............................................................................................42

A40 (39) Gaster 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 80 ); propodeum with median carina with anterior part with parallel sides ( Fig. 80 ) ................. cissusae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 86)

– Gaster 3.1–3.7× as long as wide; propodeum with median carina triangular, i.e. continually expanding backwards from anterior part..................................41

A41 (40) Antennal clava solid and 2.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 691 ); hind coxa with comparatively weak carina along posterior margin ( Fig. 55 ) ....................................... ....................................................................... aronia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 68)

– Antennal clava with a weak constriction between C1 and C2 and 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 713 ); hind coxa with a very strong carina along posterior margin (as in Fig. 21 ) .................................................... labilis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 125)

A42 (39) Mesoscutellum with elongate meshes in median part, with a complete median groove and with distinct submedian grooves ( Fig. 92 ) ...........................................43

– Mesoscutellum with ±isodiametric meshes in median part, median groove and submedian grooves indistinct or missing ....................................................44

A43 (42) Antenna longer (Fig. 1008): F1 1.5×, F2 1.4×, F3 1.3×, clava 2.7× as long as wide ............................................................. doradis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 94)

– Antenna shorter ( Fig. 704 ): F1 1.3×, F2 1.1×, F3 0.9×, clava 1.9× as long as wide ................................................... hallwachsae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 113)

A44 (42) Scape black (Fig. 1016) ................................... gabela Hansson sp.nov. (p. 106)

– Scape predominantly yellowish-brown.............................................................45

A45 (44) Gaster 3.2× as long as wide, Gt 1-4 with a longitudinal, rounded median keel ( Fig. 202 ) ......................................................... verdensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 167)

– Gaster 2.6× as long as wide, Gt 1-4 smoothly rounded dorsally .........................46

A46 (45) Gaster with Gt 1 with same strong reticulation as remaining tergites ( Fig. 170 ) ... ..................................................................... pelora Hansson sp.nov. (p. 146)

– Gaster with Gt 1 with weak reticulation and shiny ( Fig. 104 ) ................................ ...................................................................... ferula Hansson sp.nov. (p. 102)

A47 (32) Flagellum short (Fig. 1020), e.g. clava 1.7× as long as wide ............................... ................................................... guillermopereirai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 112)

– Flagellum longer, clava 2.3–3.0× as long as wide............................................48

A48 (47) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a ± rectangular incision and with an ±ovate flat and smooth area just lateral to incision (as in Fig. 43 ) ......................................49

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a ±semicircular incision, or without incision, always without ±ovate flat and smooth areas..........................................................50

A49 (48) Face below toruli with two ovate, deep and strongly reticulate pits ( Fig. 885 ); antennal clava with a weak constriction between C1 and C2 and 2.8× as long as wide (Fig. 1015) .......................................... fucata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 105)

– Face below toruli with pits below toruli indistinct ( Fig. 886 ); antennal clava solid and 2.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 811 ) .............. loboi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 130)

A50 (48) Gaster 0.6–0.7× as wide as width of mesoscutum ............................................51

– Gaster 0.8–0.9× as wide as width of mesoscutum ............................................52

A51 (50) Gaster 4.3× as long as wide, Gt 7 1.3× as long as width at base ( Fig. 76 ) ............. .................................................................... carinata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 83)

– Gaster 2.7–2.8× as long as wide, Gt 7 0.5–0.7× as long as width at base ( Fig. 140 )............................................................. lapra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 126)

A52 (50) Mesoscutellum predominantly with elongate meshes in median part (e.g. Fig. 162 )..............................................................................................................53

– Mesoscutellum predominantly with ±isodiametric meshes in median part (e.g. Fig. 194 )..............................................................................................................59

A53 (52) Mesoscutellum 0.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 132 ); gaster 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 132 ) .................................................... itabunaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 121)

– Mesoscutellum 1.0–1.1× as long as wide; gaster 2.3–2.8× as long as wide.....54

A54 (53) Propodeum with median carina ±triangular, with narrow anterior part very short, about one-fourth the length of carina ( Fig. 162 ) ............................................. ............................................................ mogensenae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 140)

– Propodeum with median carina with narrow anterior part longer ....................55

A55 (54) Mesoscutellum with a distinct median groove ( Fig. 196 ) ..................................... ...................................................... tandayapaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 163)

– Mesoscutellum without median groove ............................................................56

A56 (55) Gonoplac yellowish-brown ( Figs 78, 79 ) ............................................................. .......................................................... casacocaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 84)

– Gonoplac black .................................................................................................57

A57 (56) Antennal clava solid (Fig. 1019); propodeum with median carina wider ( Fig. 116 ), narrow anterior part about 3× as long as wide ................................................ ....................................................... guanacastensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 110)

– Antennal clava with a weak constriction between C1 and C2; propodeum with median carina very narrow, narrow anterior part at least 6× as long as wide. .....................................................................................................................58

A58 (57) Gaster 3.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 58 ); Gt 3-4 with posterior margin straight ( Fig. 58 ) .............................................................. beltearis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 71)

– Gaster 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 62 ); Gt 3-4 with posterior margin curved forward medially ( Fig. 62 ) ..................................... bidensiae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 73)

A59 (52) Antennal clava with a weak constriction between C1 and C2 (Fig. 1035), 3.0× as long as wide .................................. talamancaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 162)

– Antennal clava solid, 2.2–2.4× as long as wide................................................60

A60 (59) Gonoplac black; Gt 2 0.2-0.3× as long as Gt 4 .....................................................61

– Gonoplac yellowish-brown; Gt 2 0.4× as long as Gt 4 ........................................63

A61 (60) Antenna with pedicel yellowish-brown and F1 1.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 671 ). .................................................................................. valerus (Walker) (p. 59)

– Antenna with pedicel dark brown and F1 1.7–1.8× as long as wide ................62

A62 (61) Pedicel 1.8× as long as wide in side view ( Fig. 690 ); F2 and F3 each with six longitudinal sensillae in side view ( Fig. 690 ) ...... aliosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 65)

– Pedicel 2.4× as long as wide in side view (Fig. 1031); F2 and F3 each with 3–4 longitudinal sensillae in side view (Fig. 1031) ............................................... ..................................................................... miopis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 139)

A63 (60) Antennal clava 2.7× as long as wide (Fig. 1013) .................................................. ............................................................ fernandezae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 101)

– Antennal clava 2.3× as long as wide.................................................................64

A64 (63) Propodeum with an elongate fovea in front of median carina, with sides ±parallel ( Fig. 72 ); mesoscutellum with sides more curved ( Fig. 72 ) ............................ ..................................................................... candica Hansson sp.nov. (p. 81)

– Propodeum with fovea in front of median carina triangular, i.e. with sides diverging towards anterior part ( Fig. 198 ); mesoscutellum with sides less curved ( Fig. 198 ) ................................................... trinidadensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 164)

A65 (26) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse carina or edge dorsally (as in Figs 24 , 41 ); never with a semicircular or rectangular incision................................66

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without a transverse carina or edge dorsally, this part rounded (as in Fig. 23 ), sometimes with a semicircular or rectangular incision.......76

A66 (65) Antennal flagellum shorter, pedicel+flagellum 0.8× as long as width of mesoscutum and antennal clava 2.0–2.5× as long as wide ..............................................67

– Antennal flagellum longer, pedicel+flagellum 1.0–1.1× as long as width of mesoscutum and antennal clava 2.7–3.0× as long as wide..................................71

A67 (66) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ), or rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) ..............................................................................................68

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse carina dorsally (as in Fig. 41 ).........69

A68 (67) Gaster 2.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 74 ); medio-basal Gt 1 with a transverse edge dorsally( Fig. 74 ) ........................................ caribeae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 82)

– Gaster 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 652 ); medio-basal Gt 1 with upper part rounded ( Fig. 653 ) ............................................................. compacta (Howard) (p. 54)

A69 (67) Propodeal callus with 4–8 setae; mesoscutellum with distinct submedian grooves ( Fig. 90 ) ............................................. domingoensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 93)

– Propodeal callus with two setae; mesoscutellum with weak submedian grooves ( Figs 60 , 174 ) ..............................................................................................70

A70 (69) Propodeum with median carina ±triangular ( Fig. 60 ), i.e. carina starting to expand towards posterior part already from base (or from very near base); antennal clava 2.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 695 ) .......... bentoni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 72)

– Propodeum with median carina with anterior part with sides ±parallel for at least half the length of median carina ( Fig. 174 ); antennal clava 2.3× as long as wide (Fig. 1033) ........................................... peruviensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 148)

A71 (66) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge dorsally, entire tergite with weak reticulation, Gt 1-4 completely reticulate medially ( Fig. 126 ) ................. ................................................................ iangauldi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 117)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a strong transverse carina dorsally, entire tergite with strong reticulation, Gt 1-4 usually with a smooth median line.......................72

A72 (71) Propodeal callus with two setae; dorsellum without median carina ..................... ............................................................... brasiliensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 77)

– Propodeal callus with 7–8 setae; dorsellum with or without median carina.....73

A73 (72) Fore wing with a bare patch below marginal vein ( Fig. 185 ); Gt 1-4 completely reticulate ( Fig. 184 ) ........................................... saga Hansson sp.nov. (p. 155)

– Fore wing without bare patch below marginal vein; Gt 1-4 with a smooth median line...............................................................................................................74

A74 (73) Mesoscutellum with median part with very weak reticulation and 1.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 200 ) ........................................... valmiri Hansson sp.nov. (p. 166)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation and 2.3–2.4× as long as wide .............................................................................................................75

A75 (74) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum black non-metallic ( Fig. 158 ); genal carina strong, reaching up to level of median part of eye (as in Fig. 17 ); head 2.5× as wide as long in dorsal view .................................... mimosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 137)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum metallic blue ( Fig. 52 ); genal carina short, does not reach up to level of lower margin of eye (as in Fig. 16 ); head 2.3× as wide as long in dorsal view ......................... altamiraensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 67)

A76 (65) Gt 2-4 with a smooth median line (e.g. Fig. 130 ) ................................................77

– Gt 2-4 uniformly reticulate...................................................................................79

A77 (76) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a strong ± rectangular incision and with strong reticulation ( Fig. 130 ); median carina on propodeum triangular, concave and with anterior part wide and blunt ( Fig. 130 ), propodeal callus with eight setae ..... ...................................................................... incisa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 119)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a weak rectangular incision, and with weak reticulation ( Figs 122 , 128 ); median carina on propodeum with anterior part pointed, propodeal callus with two setae ..................................................................78

A78 (77) Antennal clava compact and solid, 2.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 707 ) ..................... ......................................................... harryramirezi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 114)

– Antennal clava more elongate, with weak constrictions between clavomeres, 2.6× as long as wide (Fig. 1021) .............................. ibis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 118)

A79 (76) Gaster 3.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 134 ) ............ janzeni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 122)

– Gaster 1.8–2.5× as long as wide .......................................................................80

A80 (79) Mid and hind tibiae predominantly dark brown ( Fig. 65 ) .................................... .............................................................. blancaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 75)

– Mid and hind tibiae yellowish-brown to pale brown ........................................81

A81 (80) Fore coxa without a sharp edge or carina along posterior margin....................82

– Fore coxa with a sharp edge or carina along posterior margin (as in Fig. 19 )..86

A82 (81) Antenna with clava 2.9× as long as wide and F3 distinctly wider than F1 ( Fig. 724 ) ....................................................... springerae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 159)

– Antenna with clava 1.7–2.0× as long as wide, in one species 2.6× as long as wide but then F1 and F3 with same width ...........................................................83

A83 (82) Antenna more slender, F1 and F3 with same width (Fig. 1026), clava 2.6× as long as wide ............................................................ liosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 128)

– Antenna more stout, F3 distinctly wider than F1, clava 1.7–2.0× as long as wide...................................................................................................................84

A84 (83) Propodeum with median carina anteriorly strongly raised ( Fig. 204 ); mesoscutellum with submedian grooves distinct ( Fig. 204 ) .................................................... ............................................................. volcanensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 168)

– Propodeum with median carina uniformly level; mesoscutellum with submedian grooves weak and indistinct ........................................................................85

A85 (84) Median carina on propodeum with narrow anterior part about 3.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 68 ) .................................................. cabroensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 78)

– Median carina on propodeum with narrow anterior part about 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 96 ) .............................................. duniagarciae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 97)

A86 (81) Antennal scape dark brown (Fig. 1038) ........... philyra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 150)

– Antennal scape yellowish-brown......................................................................87

A87 (86) Antennal clava 1.8× as long as wide.................................................................88

– Antennal clava 2.1–2.9× as long as wide..........................................................89

A88 (87) Flagellum+pedicel 0.9× as long as width of mesoscutum; gaster with apex rounded ( Fig. 70 ) .................................................... camachoi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 79)

– Flagellum+pedicel 0.7× as long as width of mesoscutum; gaster with apex pointed ( Fig. 206 ) .................................................... zunigai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 169)

A89 (87) Antennal clava with a constriction between C1 and C2 (as in Fig. 38 ) and 2.7–2.8× as long as wide ............................................................................................90

– Antennal clava solid (as in Fig. 37 ) and 2.1× as long as wide..........................91

A90 (89) Funiculars longer, e.g. F1 2.5× and F2 1.9× as long as wide (Fig. 1005) ............. ...................................................................... collina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 87)

– Funiculars shorter, e.g. F1 1.2× and F2 1.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 711 ).............. ....................................................... monteverdensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 141)

A91 (89) Carina along posterior margin of fore coxa very strong and surface in front of carina (i.e. outer lateral surface of fore coxa) concave (as in Fig. 19 )....................... ........................................................................... alas Hansson sp.nov. (p. 64)

– Carina along posterior margin of fore coxa as a sharp edge and surface in front of carina convex............................................... noyesi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 144)

Subkey B

B1 [7] Mesosoma dark brown, non-metallic ( Fig. 230 ); dorsellum concave with strong sculpture ( Fig. 230 ) ................................. anomala Hansson sp.nov. (p. 189)

– Mesosoma metallic; dorsellum flat to convex with weak sculpture ...................2

B2 (1) Gaster 4.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 212 ); gonoplac 1.0× as long as length of hind femur; hind femur 3.6× as long as wide ..... corista Hansson sp.nov. (p. 173)

– Gaster 2.5–3.9× as long as wide; length of gonoplac and length/width of hind femur variable..........................................................................................................3

B3 (2) Gonoplac as long as length of hind femur and hind femur short and stout ( Fig. 209 ), 3.2× as long as wide .................................. amadea Hansson sp.nov. (p. 171)

– Gonoplac usually shorter than hind femur, if equally long then hind femur at least 4.6× as long as wide ......................................................................................4

B4 (3) Hind femur short and stout, 3.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 219 ); antenna with pedicel+F1–F3 yellowish-brown (Fig. 1049) ................................................. ....................................................................... fabia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 177)

– Hind femur 3.4–4.9× as long as wide; antenna with pedicel+F1–F3 dark brown .......................................................................................................................5

B5 (4) Gonoplac very long, 1.0–1.1× as long as hind femur; hind femur 4.6–4.9× as long as wide...........................................................................................................6

– Gonoplac shorter than hind femur; hind femur 3.4–4.6× as long as wide, if 4.6× as long as wide then gonoplac 0.8× as long as hind femur ...............................7

B6 (5) Gonoplac 1.0× as long as hind femur ( Fig. 215 ); hind femur 4.9× as long as wide ................................................................... elegans Hansson sp.nov. (p. 174)

– Gonoplac 1.1× as long as hind femur ( Fig. 211 ); hind femur 4.6× as long as wide .................................................................... coralis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 172)

B7 (5) Fore and mid coxae yellowish-brown, hind coxa brown in basal half and yellowish-brown in apical half ( Fig. 221 ); hind femur 4.6× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with median part with very fine reticulation and very elongate meshes ( Fig. 220 ) ................................................................. fuga Hansson sp.nov. (p. 178)

– All coxae predominantly dark brown to black, sometimes metallic; hind femur 3.4–3.8× (4.5× in G. eroica ) as long as wide; mesoscutellum with median part with stronger reticulation and less elongate meshes .....................................8

B8 (7) Mesoscutellum with median part with large meshes that are ±isodiametric in posterior half ( Fig. 226 ) ..................................... mynta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 182)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with smaller meshes that are more elongate (e.g. Fig. 222 ) ........................................................................................................9

B9 (8) Hind tibia yellowish-brown ( Fig. 223 ); hind femur 3.4× as long as wide ............ ....................................................................... lama Hansson sp.nov. (p. 179)

– Hind tibia yellowish-brown in basal half and brown to dark brown in apical half; hind femur 3.7–4.4× as long as wide ..........................................................10

B10 (9) Hind femur 4.4× as long as wide; mesoscutum and mesoscutellum dark brown to black with weak metallic tinges ( Fig. 216 ). eroica Hansson sp.nov. (p. 176)

– Hind femur 3.7× as long as wide; mesoscutum and mesoscutellum metallic green or blue..........................................................................................................11

B11 (10) Gonoplac 0.6× as long as hind femur ................................................................... .................................................................... lasallei Hansson sp.nov. (p. 180)

– Gonoplac 0.9× as long as hind femur ................................................................... ....................................................................... rosea Hansson sp.nov. (p. 173)

Subkey C

C1 [30] Fore coxa with a carina along anterior and/or posterior margin (as in Figs 18, 19 ); Gt 2–7 with weak reticulation...........................................................................2

– Fore coxa without carinae; Gt 2–7 with variable reticulation ................................4

C2 (1) Antenna with pedicel+flagellum 1.0× as long as width of mesoscutum, and with clava solid and short, 2.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 850 ) .................................... ............................................................... myrsineae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 402)

– Antenna with pedicel+flagellum 1.2–1.4× as long as width of mesoscutum, and with clava 3.4–3.5× as long as wide with distinct constriction between C1 and C2 ..................................................................................................................3

C3 (2) Gaster 3.4× as long as wide, Gt 1 with ±parallel sides ( Fig. 330 ); petiole very short just a narrow band, without sculpture ..... carinifer Hansson sp.nov. (p. 267)

– Gaster 2.2× as long as wide, Gt 1 with sides diverging backwards from base ( Fig. 350 ); petiole 0.4× as long as wide with strong sculpture on dorsal surface .... .................................................................... cortina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 282)

C4 (1) Antennal clava with distinct constriction between C1 and C2 (Fig, 787) ............ ..................................................................... eximia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 305)

– Antennal clava solid, or with a weak constriction between C1 and C2..............5

C5 (4) Gt 1 with weak reticulation ( Fig. 428 ) ................. ingae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 336)

– Gt 1 with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 406 ) .........................................................6

C6 (5) Fore wing with part between marginal vein and hind margin of wing ±bare ( Fig. 407 ); gaster 2.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 406 ) ................................................... ................................................................ gonzalezi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 320)

– Fore wing with part between marginal vein and hind margin of wing predominantly setose; length of gaster variable ....................................................................7

C7 (6) Mesoscutellum with outer margin of submedian grooves missing (fig. 4 in Perioto et al. 2009); gaster elongate, 2.8× as long as wide (fig. 10 in Perioto et al. 2009) ...................................................................... itauna Perioto & Costa (p. 198)

– Mesoscutellum with outer margin of submedian grooves distinct; gaster 2.0–2.1× as long as wide ..............................................................................................8

C8 (7) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with different colours ( Fig. 402 ) ...................... ........................................................................ giria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 317)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with same colour ( Fig. 398 ) ............................. ...................................................................... gavia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 314)

Subkey D

D1 [33] Outer margin of submedian grooves on mesoscutellum indistinct ( Fig. 430 ) ....2

– Outer margin of submedian grooves on mesoscutellum distinct in at least posterior half.................................................................................................................3

D2 (1) Antenna longer ( Fig. 804 ), F3 1.9× and clava 3.2× as long as wide .................... ...................................................................... intesa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 338)

– Antenna shorter (Fig. 1083), F3 1.4× and clava 2.5× as long as wide ................. .................................................................... munda Hansson sp.nov. (p. 399)

D3 (1) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum diverging towards posterior part...........4

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum ±parallel................................................8

D4 (3) Propodeum with strong reticulation only............................................................5

– Propodeum with a mix of irregular carinae and reticulation ..............................7

D5 (4) Mesoscutellum with a median groove and with distinct submedian grooves ( Fig. 510 ) ................................................................ miria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 392)

– Mesoscutellum without a median groove and with submedian grooves indistinct ( Figs 368 , 464 ) ..............................................................................................6

D6 (5) Mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide with strongly elongate meshes, thus appearing striate ( Fig. 368 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 42 ) ................................................... diriaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 294)

– Mesoscutellum 1.0× as long as wide, not appearing striate ( Fig. 464 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 without edge dorsally (as in Fig. 23 ) ............................................. ........................................................................ liria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 361)

D7 (4) Mesosoma with metallic blue tinges ( Fig. 526 ) .. nana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 403)

– Mesosoma black non-metallic ( Fig. 378 ) ....... eridana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 301)

D8 (3) Petiole yellowish-brown ( Fig. 324 ) ......... cararaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 263)

– Petiole dark brown to black ................................................................................9

D9 (8) Mesoscutellum with median part strongly rugose ( Fig. 911 ) ............................... ................................................................... ladrona Hansson sp.nov. (p. 350)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation .................................10

D10 (9) Propodeal callus with seven setae; dorsellum without median carina .................. ..................................................................... orillia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 426)

– Propodeal callus with 2–5 setae; dorsellum with or without median carina.....11

D11 (10) Mesosoma dark brown......................................................................................12

– Mesosoma black, to black with metallic tinges ................................................15

D12 (11) Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves close ( Fig. 386 ), median part 3.9× as long as wide and distance between submedian grooves 1.2× the distance between a submedian groove and lateral margin of mesoscutellum (measured medially); antennal clava 4.8× as long as wide with long spicule, 0.4× the length of C3 ( Fig. 788 ) ....................................................... faina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 306)

– Mesoscutellum with submedian grooves wider apart, median part 2.4–3.1× as long as wide and distance between submedian grooves 1.8–3.2× the distance between a submedian groove and lateral margin of mesoscutellum (measured medially); antennal clava 3.4–4.1× as long as wide with short spicule, 0.3× the length of C3 ................................................................................................................13

D13 (12) Mesoscutellum with median part 3.1× as long as wide, distance between submedian grooves 1.8× the distance between a submedian groove and lateral margin of mesoscutellum (measured medially) ( Fig. 422 ); propodeal callus with four setae; antennal clava 4.1× as long as wide (Fig. 1077) ............................................. ........................................................................ idris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 331)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.4–2.5× as long as wide, distance between submedian grooves 2.3–3.2× the distance between a submedian groove and lateral margin of mesoscutellum (measured medially); propodeal callus with two setae; antennal clava 3.4–4.0× as long as wide .....................................................14

D14 (13) Dorsellum with median carina; mid coxa and trochanters on all legs yellow ( Fig. 427 ) ............................................................. infusca Hansson sp.nov. (p. 334)

– Dorsellum without median carina; mid coxa dark brown and trochanters on all legs pale brown ( Fig. 263 ) .................... allisonbrownae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 221)

D15 (11) Apex of gaster pointed (dorsal view) ( Fig. 538 ) ................................................... ................................................................ nigricans Hansson sp.nov. (p. 412)

– Apex of gaster more blunt (dorsal view) (e.g. Fig. 610 )...................................16

D16 (15) Body black non-metallic...................................................................................17

– Mesosoma and Gt 1 with metallic blue tinges....................................................18

D17 (16) Genal carina strong, reaching to level of lower eye margin (as in Fig. 17 ); propodeal callus with 4 setae; gaster 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 610 ) ............................. .................................................................. truncata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 461)

– Genal carina reaching half-way to level of lower eye margin (as in Fig. 16 ); propodeal callus with 2 setae; gaster 1.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 262 ) ................. ....................................................... allisonbrownae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 221)

D18 (16) Mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide and flattened ( Fig. 410 ) .............................. ............................................................ graciliclava Hansson sp.nov. (p. 323)

– Mesoscutellum 1.0–1.1× as long as wide and convex......................................19

D19 (18) Gastral tergites with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 592 )....................................... .................................................................... pyrillia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 449)

– Gastral tergites with weak reticulation ( Fig. 264 ) ................................................. ..................................................................... alloris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 222)

Subkey E

E1 [40] Fore coxa predominantly yellowish-brown to predominantly dark brown nonmetallic..........................................................................................................2

– Fore coxa predominantly to completely metallic..............................................22

E2 (1) Gaster very long, 3.2–4.6× as long as wide ........................................................3

– Gaster at most 2.8× as long as wide....................................................................7

E3 (2) Gaster 4.4–4.6× as long as wide and Gt 7 2.7–2.9× as long as width at base ......4

– Gaster 3.2–3.7× as long as wide and Gt 7

1.2–2.0× as long as width at base ......5

E4 (3) Hind coxa 2.1× as long as wide in lateral view .................................................... ................................................................... grandis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 324)

– Hind coxa 1.7× as long as wide in lateral view .................................................... ................................................................. wilsonae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 470)

E5 (3) Gonoplac predominantly pale brown ( Fig. 341 ); setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum white ( Fig. 340 ) ..................... clematisae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 275)

– Gonoplac black; setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum dark brown ............6

E6 (5) Fore coxa yellowish-brown ( Fig. 371 ).............. dolosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 295)

– Fore coxa dark brown ( Fig. 627 ) .............. zurquiensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 473)

E7 (2) Setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum white ( Fig. 408 ); gastral tergites with strong and large-meshed reticulation ( Fig. 408 ) ...........................................8

– Setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum dark brown; reticulation on gastral tergites variable..........................................................................................................9

E8 (7) Propodeum with median carina with sides parallel in anterior half ( Fig. 408 ); petiole short, a narrow band without sculpture .. gouaniae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 322)

– Propodeum with median carina elongate triangular, i.e. with sides diverging towards posterior part from very anterior part ( Fig. 344 ); petiole transverse with strong sculpture on dorsal surface......................... codata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 278)

E9 (7) Gt 1 with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 456 ) .......................................................10

– Gt 1 with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 380 ).........................................................13

E10 (9) Mesoscutellum with outer margin of submedian grooves indistinct throughout ( Fig. 456 ); median part of mesoscutellum 4.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 456 ) ............ ........................................................................ lema Hansson sp.nov. (p. 355)

– Mesoscutellum with outer margin of submedian grooves distinct in at least posterior one-third; median part of mesoscutellum 3.3× as long as wide ..................11

E11 (10) Gonoplac short and stout, 2.5× as long as high in lateral view ( Fig. 40 ) ............. ........................................................................ flora Hansson sp.nov. (p. 312)

– Gonoplac 4.0× as long as high in lateral view..................................................12

E12 (11) Fore coxa yellowish-brown ( Fig. 425 ) ............. illydris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 332)

– Fore coxa dark brown with very base metallic ( Fig. 549 ) .................................... ................................................................... ocoteae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 419)

E13 (9) Gaster 2.8× as long as wide ..............................................................................14

– Gaster 1.4–2.5× as long as wide .......................................................................16

E14 (13) Median propodeum predominantly with reticulation ( Fig. 380 ); flagellomeres longer ( Fig. 778 ), e.g. F1 2.8× as long as wide; petiole pale brown ( Fig. 380 ) ......... ................................................................... estrella Hansson sp.nov. (p. 302)

– Median propodeum with irregular carinae, no reticulation; flagellomeres shorter, F1 1.7–2.3× as long as wide; petiole black .................................................15

E15 (14) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with six longitudinal carinae (as in Fig. 28 ); F1 2.3× and F2 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 874 ) ............ umanai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 463)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with two longitudinal carinae (as in Fig. 27 ); F1 1.7× and F2 1.8× as long as wide (Fig. 1084) ............. osmia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 429)

E16 (13) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum straight and parallel ( Fig. 440 ) ............... ......................................................................... juni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 344)

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum ±curved and diverging from the middle towards posterior part..................................................................................17

E17 (16) Midlobe of mesoscutum with weak reticulation and shiny ( Fig. 336 ); fore coxa predominantly yellowish-brown and scape predominantly dark brown ( Fig. 337 ) .......................................................... chrysops Hansson sp.nov. (p. 272)

– Midlobe of mesoscutum with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 462 ); fore coxa predominantly dark brown to brown and scape predominantly yellowish-brown ...18

E18 (17) Mesoscutellum with median part 3.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 462 ) ....................... .............................................................. limonensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 360)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.7–3.6× as long as wide .............................19

E19 (18) Propodeum with median carina ±triangular, expanding backwards from very anterior part ( Fig. 288 ) ................................................ assai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 238)

– Propodeum with median carina predominantly narrow with parallel sides......20

E20 (19) Femora yellowish-brown ( Fig. 349 ) ............... coriolis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 281)

– Femora predominantly dark brown...................................................................21

E21 (20) Gaster 0.9× as wide as width of mesoscutum ( Fig. 376 ); median part of mesoscutellum 2.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 376 ) .............. eolio Hansson sp.nov. (p. 299)

– Gaster 0.8× as wide as width of mesoscutum ( Fig. 334 ); median part of mesoscutellum 3.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 334 ) ............ cernia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 271)

E22 (1) Gt 1 with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 530 ), at least on median part .................23

– Gt 1 with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 272 ).........................................................47

E23 (22) Gaster 3.2–3.5× as long as wide .......................................................................24

– Gaster at most 3.0× as long as wide..................................................................27

E24 (23) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ), or a sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ) ..................................25

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1

with dorsal part rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) .....................26

E25 (24) Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation ( Fig. 530 ) ................... ................................................................... neblina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 407)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with very weak reticulation ( Fig. 444 ) ............ ................................................................... labrada Hansson sp.nov. (p. 347)

E26 (24) Gaster 3.5× as long as wide with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 620 ), Gt 7 1.7× as long as width at base ........................ weinmanniae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 468)

– Gaster 3.2× as long as wide with weaker reticulation than in alternate ( Fig. 626 ), Gt 7 1.2× as long as width at base ......... zurquiensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 473)

E27 (23) Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation/rugosity (e.g. Figs 298 , 552 )..............................................................................................................28

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation .................................34

E28 (27) Gaster short ovate ( Fig. 296 ), 1.7× as long as wide .............................................. ................................................................... baldosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 243)

– Gaster elongate, at least 2.1× as long as wide...................................................29

E29 (28) Gaster with apex more acuminate ( Fig. 280 ), Gt 7 1.6× as long as width at base. ...................................................................... arada Hansson sp.nov. (p. 233)

– Gaster with apex less pointed (e.g. Fig. 298 ) Gt 7 0.8–1.2× as long as width at base..............................................................................................................30

E30 (29) Mesoscutellum with median part reticulate ......................................................31

– Mesoscutellum with median part strongly rugose (e.g. Fig. 552 ) ....................33

E31 (30) Mesoscutellum 1.0× as long as wide, median part with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 298 ); costal setal row in fore wing with a gap in the middle (as in Fig. 36 ) ... ................................................................... bariolis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 245)

– Mesoscutellum 1.1–1.3× as long as wide, median part with weaker reticulation than in alternate (e.g. Fig. 418 ); costal setal row in fore wing uninterrupted (as in Fig. 35 ) ....................................................................................................32

E32 (31) Mesoscutellum 1.3× as long as wide, without median groove ( Fig. 418 ); gastral tergites with weaker reticulation than in alternate ( Fig. 418 ) .......................... .................................................................. hesperis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 329)

– Mesoscutellum 1.1× as long as wide, with a weak median groove ( Fig. 318 ); gastral tergites with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 318 ) .............................................. .................................................................. brinaris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 258)

E33 (30) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ); costal setal row unbroken (as in Fig. 35 ) ..... opala Hansson sp.nov. (p. 422)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with dorsal part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ); costal setal row broken (as in Fig. 36 ) ................ menoris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 384)

E34 (27) Antenna short, F1 1.3–1.7× as long as wide.....................................................35

– Antenna long, F1 1.9–2.8× as long as wide......................................................40

E35 (34) Propodeum predominantly with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 258 )..................36

– Propodeum with a mix of irregular carinae and weak or strong reticulation....38

E36 (35) Gaster 2.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 258 ) ............. alegra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 218)

– Gaster at least 2.5× as long as wide ..................................................................37

E37 (36) Gaster 3.0× as long as wide with comparatively small meshes ( Fig. 460 ) ........... ..................................................................... leonae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 358)

– Gaster 2.5× as long as wide with comparatively large meshes ( Fig. 602 ) ............ .............................................................. schefflerae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 456)

E38 (35) Gastral tergites reticulate with comparatively small meshes ( Fig. 244 ) ............... .................................................................. abraxas Hansson sp.nov. (p. 209)

– Gastral tergites reticulate with large meshes ( Fig. 450 )....................................39

E39 (38) Gaster 2.9× as long as wide ( Fig.450 ); colour of body rather dull ( Fig. 450 ) ...... ....................................................................... lapsa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 351)

– Gaster 2.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 474 ); distinctly metallic species ( Fig. 474 ) ..... ................................................................ maculifer Hansson sp.nov. (p. 368)

E40 (34) Mesoscutellum with median part 4.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 550 ) ....................... ..................................................................... octava Hansson sp.nov. (p. 421)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.3–3.3× as long as wide .............................41

E41 (40) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 328 ) ....................... ................................................................. carbonis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 265)

– Mesoscutellum with median part at least 2.7× as long as wide ........................42

E42 (41) Propodeal callus with six setae; weakly metallic species ( Fig. 496 ) .................... ................................................................. meleadis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 383)

– Propodeal callus with two setae; more metallic species (e.g. Figs 436 , 566 )...43

E43 (42) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with dorsal part smoothly rounded, with short longitudinal carinae laterally (as in Fig. 27 )....................................................................44

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge/carina dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ), or an edge/carina shaped like an inverted U (as in Figs 41, 42 ) .................46

E44 (43) Propodeum with median carina wide, anterior part (i.e. part with ±parallel sides) about 2× as long as wide, and expanding backwards from median part of carina ( Fig. 436 ) ........................................................ isola Hansson sp.nov. (p. 342)

– Propodeum with median carina narrow, anterior part with ±parallel sides about 6× as long as wide, and expanding backwards from close to hind margin ......45

E45 (44) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum indistinct in posterior part ( Fig. 566 ); gaster 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 566 ) ................. palenta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 431)

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum ±distinct in posterior part ( Fig. 434 ); gaster 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 434 ) ......................... ira Hansson sp.nov. (p. 340)

E46 (43) Median part of propodeum predominantly with irregular carinae ( Fig. 384 ); gaster 2.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 384 ) ................... eximia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 305)

– Median part of propodeum predominantly with reticulation ( Fig. 362 ); gaster 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 362 ) ................ cyaneoviridis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 290)

E47 (22) Mesoscutellum with median part with relatively strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 516 ), at least in anterior part, and with a distinct median groove.........................48

– Mesoscutellum with median part with very weak reticulation throughout (e.g. Fig. 366 ), and at most with a very weak median groove in anterior part ...........49

E48 (47) Propodeal callus with three setae; scape with apical half dark brown to black ( Fig. 835) ................................................................ mora Hansson sp.nov. (p. 396)

– Propodeal callus with 7–10 setae; entire scape yellowish-brown ( Fig. 839 ) ........ ................................................................... milagra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 389)

E49 (47) Gaster 2.7–2.8× as long as wide .......................................................................50

– Gaster 1.7–2.4× as long as wide .......................................................................51

E50 (49) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with five longitudinal carinae (as in Fig. 28 ); strongly metallic and shiny species ( Fig. 366 ) ........ devania Hansson sp.nov. (p. 293)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with two longitudinal carinae laterally (as in Fig. 27 ); weakly metallic and dull species ( Fig. 504 ) .. miga Hansson sp.nov. (p. 388)

E51 (49) Propodeal callus with 4–9 setae ........................................................................52

– Propodeal callus with two setae ........................................................................56

E52 (51) Antenna with F1 3.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 740 ); mesoscutellum with median part 4.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 272 ) ................... amyra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 227)

– Antenna with F1 1.5–1.8× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with median part 2.3–3.6× as long as wide ............................................................................................53

E53 (52) Gaster 2.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 540 ); mesoscutellum with median part 3.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 540 ) ............................. nishidai Hansson sp.nov. (p. 413)

– Gaster 1.7–2.1× as long as wide; mesoscutellum with median part 2.3–2.7× as long as wide.........................................................................................................54

E54 (53) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.3× as long as wide and 2.9× as wide as width of lateral parts (measured medially); lateral parts with comparatively weak reticulation ( Fig. 286 ) ..................................... artis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 236)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.5–2.7× as long as wide and 2.4× as wide as width of lateral parts; lateral parts with comparatively strong reticulation/sculpture .....................................................................................................................55

E55 (54) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with four longitudinal short carinae (as in Fig. 28 , but with 4 carinae); mesoscutellum with median part with very weak reticulation ( Fig. 294 ) .................................................................. avis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 242)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with two longitudinal short carinae (as in Fig. 27 ); mesoscutellum with median part with stronger reticulation than in alternate ( Fig. 452 ) ............................................................... latosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 353)

E56 (51) Propodeum predominantly with strong reticulation ( Fig. 586 ) ............................ ............................................................... pilonensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 445)

– Propodeum with a mix of reticulation and strong irregular carinae, or predominantly with strong carinae ......................................................................................57

E57 (56) Mesoscutellum with median part 4.0–4.6× as long as wide .............................58

– Mesoscutellum with median part 3.0–3.1× as long as wide .............................59

E58 (57) Dorsellum without median carina ..................... veluda Hansson sp.nov. (p. 464)

– Dorsellum with median carina ................. aureoviridis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 240)

E59 (57) All femora predominantly dark brown to black, hind femur with metallic tinges ( Fig. 365 ) .............................................. daleskeyae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 291)

– At least mid and hind femora yellowish-brown, yellowish-white or pale brown. .....................................................................................................................60

E60 (59) Scape dark brown with base yellowish-brown ( Fig. 881 ); antenna longer, flagellum+pedicel 1.4× as long as width of mesosoma ................................... .................................................................... wilsoni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 471)

– Scape yellowish-brown ( Figs 862 ); antenna shorter, flagellum+pedicel 1.3× as long as width of mesosoma .............................. pensada Hansson sp.nov. (p. 438)

Subkey F

F1 [41] Gaster short ovate, 1.3–1.7× as long as wide with apex rounded (e.g. Fig. 304 ). .......................................................................................................................2

– Gaster at least 1.8× as long as wide and with apex more pointed ......................8

F2 (1) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with strikingly different colours ( Fig. 304 ) ..... .................................................................... bicolor Hansson sp.nov. (p. 248)

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with same colour............................................3

F3 (2) Propodeal callus with eight setae ..................... clavata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 274)

– Propodeal callus with 2–3 setae ..........................................................................4

F4 (3) Mesosoma dark brown non metallic...................................................................5

– Mesosoma metallic bluish-green ........................................................................6

F5 (4) Flagellomeres more slender, e.g F1 and F2 both 1.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 796 ); dorsellum without median carina ................. gridis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 326)

– Flagellomeres less slender, F1 and F2 both 1.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 803 ); dorsellum with median carina .............................. infusca Hansson sp.nov. (p. 334)

F6 (4) Gastral tergites with very strong reticulation with large meshes ( Fig. 508 ) ......... ................................................................... miliaris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 389)

– Gastral tergites with weaker reticulation and smaller meshes ( Figs 484, 486 )...7

F7 (6) Antenna with F3 1.3× and clava 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 826 ) ........................ ................................................................. manotris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 375)

– Antenna with F3 1.9× and clava 3.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 837 ) ........................ .................................................................... marbis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 376)

F8 (1) Gaster 3.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 554 ) ............. opima Hansson sp.nov. (p. 424)

– Gaster at most 3.2× as long as wide....................................................................9

F9 (8) Fore wing costal setal row with at least one seta missing in median part so there is a gap in the line (as in Fig. 36 )....................................................................10

– Fore wing with costal setal row unbroken (as in Fig. 35 ).................................25

F10 (9) Gt 7 1.7× as long as width at base ......................................................................11

– Gt 7 0.9–1.4× as long as width at base ...............................................................12

F11 (10) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ); setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum white ( Fig. 466 ); propodeal callus with eight setae ............................................ longicauda Hansson sp.nov. (p. 362)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with longitudinal short carinae (as in Fig. 27 ), without edge dorsally; setae on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum dark brown ( Fig. 432 ); propodeal callus with four setae ................ intruita Hansson sp.nov. (p. 339)

F12 (10) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 )...........13

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without a transverse edge dorsally, this part smoothly rounded (as in Fig. 23 ) ................................................................................18

F13 (12) Median part of mesoscutellum with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 572 ) .............. ..................................................................... patina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 435)

– Median part of mesoscutellum with relatively weak reticulation .....................14

F14 (13) Head and mesosoma black with weak metallic tinges ( Fig. 290 ) ......................... ...................................................................... atrata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 239)

– Head and mesosoma metallic green or blue .....................................................15

F15 (14) Gastral tergites with strong reticulation with large meshes, Gt 1-6 strongly metallic ( Fig. 454 ) ....................................................... lealis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 354)

– Gastral tergites with weaker reticulation and smaller meshes, only Gt 1 strongly metallic (e.g. Fig. 528 ) ................................................................................16

F16 (15) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.5× as long as wide, with submedian grooves converging slightly towards posterior part ( Fig. 528 ); propodeal callus with 6–7 setae .............................................................. navia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 405)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.8–3.3× as long as wide, with submedian grooves parallel or diverging towards posterior part; propodeal callus with 3–4 setae .....................................................................................................................17

F17 (16) Mesoscutellum with median part 3.3× as long as wide, with submedian grooves diverging towards posterior part ( Fig. 316 ); gonoplac 0.7× as long as length of hind femur; gaster 2.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 316 ) ......................................... .................................................................. bricenoi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 257)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.8× as long as wide, with submedian diverging grooves parallel ( Fig. 382 ); gonoplac 1.0× as long as length of hind femur; gaster 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 382 ) ... evgenyzakharovi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 303)

F18 (12) Scape dark brown to black (Fig. 1091) ............. orbitis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 425)

– Scape yellowish-brown.....................................................................................19

F19 (18) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 without short longitudinal carinae/edges laterally (as in Fig. 23 ) ........................................................................................................20

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with short longitudinal carinae/edges laterally (as in Fig. 27 )................................................................................................................21

F20 (19) Mesoscutellum 1.0× as long as wide, with strong reticulation throughout and with a weak and incomplete median groove ( Fig. 312 ); median part of propodeum with strong reticulation ( Fig. 312 ) ............... bravis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 254)

– Mesoscutellum 1.2× as long as wide, with weak reticulation on median part and with a strong and complete median groove ( Fig. 514 ); median part of propodeum with strong carinae ( Fig. 514 ) ................. montanis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 394)

F21 (19) Mesoscutellum with a strong and complete median groove.............................22

– Mesoscutellum without, or with a weak and incomplete median groove.........23

F22 (19) Gt 1 with strong reticulation ( Fig. 256 ); median propodeum predominantly with longitudinal carinae ( Fig. 256 ); lower mesepisternum with strong reticulation ...................................................................... alanis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 217)

– Gt 1 with relatively weak reticulation ( Fig. 388 ); median propodeum with transverse carinae and reticulation ( Fig. 388 ); lower mesepisternum with weak reticulation, partly smooth .................................................. falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

F23 (19) Median part of mesoscutellum with weak reticulation (i.e. stronger than in alternate) ( Fig. 356 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 with four short longitudinal carinae (as in Fig. 28 , but with 4 carinae); antennal clava without constriction between C2 and C3, and with a relatively weak constriction between C1 and C2 ( Fig. 774 ) ........................................................... criniera Hansson sp.nov. (p. 286)

– Median part of mesoscutellum with very weak and superficial reticulation ( Fig. 266 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 with two short longitudinal carinae laterally (as in Fig. 27 ); antennal clava with distinct constriction between clavomeres ( Fig. 739 )..............................................................................................................24

F24 (23) Mesoscutellum strongly metallic (golden-green) ( Fig. 266 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum parallel ( Fig. 266 ); mid coxa yellowish-brown ( Fig. 267 ) ..... ...................................................................... altura Hansson sp.nov. (p. 224)

– Mesoscutellum black with metallic tinges ( Fig. 438 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum converging towards posterior part ( Fig. 438 ); mid coxa dark brown ( Fig. 439 ) ......................................... jaymesonesae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 343)

F25 (9) Gaster 2.8–3.2× as long as wide, Gt 7 1.4–1.6× as long as width at base ..........26

– Gaster 1.9–2.7× as long as wide, but if 2.7× as long as wide then Gt 7 1.0× as long as width at base ...........................................................................................29

F26 (25) Propodeal callus with seven setae ..................................................................... 27

– Propodeal callus with two setae ........................................................................28

F27 (26) Mesoscutellum with weak reticulation on median part ( Fig. 352 ); gaster 3.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 352 )............................... cosidis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 283)

– Mesoscutellum with strong reticulation on median part ( Fig. 584 ); gaster 2.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 584 )............................... picuda Hansson sp.nov. (p. 444)

F28 (26) Antennal flagellum slender, e.g. clava 3.6× as long as wide (Fig. 1070); gonoplac pale brown ( Fig. 321 ) ................................... burra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 260)

– Antennal flagellum more stout, clava 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 818 ); gonoplac black ( Fig. 461 ) ........................................... leonae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 358)

F29 (25) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a transverse edge/carina dorsally, or with a carina shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ); mesoscutellum with a weak to strong median groove .............................................................................................30

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with dorsal part smoothly rounded, with or without longitudinal carinae/edges laterally (as in Figs 23, 27 ); mesoscutellum with or without a median groove ..........................................................................................35

F30 (29) Mesoscutellum with lateral parts with about 15 white setae ( Fig. 308 ); gonoplac pale brown, distinctly paler than Gt 7 ( Fig. 308 ) .............................................. ................................................................... blakeae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 252)

– Mesoscutellum with lateral parts with at most ten brown to black setae; gonoplac dark brown to black, with same colour as Gt 7 .............................................31

F31 (30) Propodeal callus with 2 setae ....................... teronadis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 457)

– Propodeal callus with 5–6 setae ........................................................................32

F32 (31) Median propodeum with strong reticulation.....................................................33

– Median propodeum with a mix of irregular carinae and reticulation ...............34

F33 (32) Gaster 2.6–2.7× as long as wide, tergites with small meshes ( Fig. 522 ) .............. ................................................................... myrciae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 400)

– Gaster 2.4× as long as wide, tergites with larger meshes ( Fig. 454 ) .................... ....................................................................... lealis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 354)

F34 (32) Gaster 2.0× as long as wide and 1.3× as long as mesosoma; gastral tergites with very strong reticulation ( Fig. 346 ); mesoscutum predominantly metallic purple ( Fig. 346 ) .................................................... copala Hansson sp.nov. (p. 279)

– Gaster 2.2× as long as wide and 1.5× as long as mesosoma; gastral tergites with weaker reticulation than in alternate ( Fig. 244 ); mesoscutum metallic bluish-green ( Fig. 244 ) ........................................ abraxas Hansson sp.nov. (p. 209)

F35 (29) Mesoscutellum with a complete and strong median groove ( Fig. 268 ); scape predominantly dark brown ( Fig. 747 ) .......... ambigua Hansson sp.nov. (p. 225)

– Mesoscutellum without, or with a very weak median groove, if with a weak groove then scape is yellowish-brown ....................................................................36

F36 (35) Mesosoma dark brown with metallic blue tinges .............................................37

– Mesosoma metallic green to blue .....................................................................38

F37 (36) Antennal clava with constriction between C2 and C3 (Fig. 1078); mesoscutellum 1.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 438 ); gaster 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 438 ) ......... ......................................................... jaymesonesae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 343)

– Antennal clava without constriction between C2 and C3 ( Fig. 847 ); mesoscutellum 1.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 536 ); gaster 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 536 ) ......... ................................................................... nicoyae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 411)

F38 (36) Mesoscutellum 1.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 546 ) ................................................... ....................................................................... oasis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 418)

– Mesoscutellum 1.1–1.3× as long as wide .........................................................39

F39 (38) Propodeal callus with 5–6 setae ........................................................................40

– Propodeal callus with 2–3 setae ........................................................................42

F40 (39) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 266 ); gaster 2.2× as long as wide, Gt 1 with weak reticulation ( Fig. 266 ) ........................................ ...................................................................... altura Hansson sp.nov. (p. 224)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 3.0–3.3× as long as wide; gaster 2.5–2.7× as long as wide, Gt 1 with strong reticulation ( Figs 496 , 522 )..................................41

F41 (40) Median propodeum with strong reticulation ( Fig. 522 ) ........................................ ................................................................... myrciae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 400)

– Median propodeum with a mix of irregular carinae and reticulation ( Fig. 496 ) .. ................................................................. meleadis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 383)

F42 (39) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 518 ); antennal clava with apical spicule long and slender ( Fig. 843 ) .............................................. .................................................................. moradis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 397)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 3.0–3.3× as long as wide; antennal clava with apical spicule shorter and stouter than in alternate (e.g. Fig. 805 )..............43

F43 (42) Scape predominantly dark brown ( Fig. 805 ); mesoscutellum with median part 3.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 434 ); propodeum with median carina narrow ( Fig. 434 ), about 13× as long as median width; Gt 1 with strong reticulation ( Fig. 434 ) .. ........................................................................... ira Hansson sp.nov. (p. 340)

– Scape predominantly to completely yellowish-brown; mesoscutellum with median part 3.2–3.3× as long as wide; propodeum with median carina wide, about 7× as long as median width; Gt 1 with weak reticulation ( Figs 440 , 488 ).........44

F44 (43) Mesoscutellum 1.3× as long as wide with median part 3.3× as long as wide ( Fig. 440 ); gaster 2.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 440 ) ... juni Hansson sp.nov. (p. 344)

– Mesoscutellum 1.2× as long as wide with median part 3.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 488 ); gaster 1.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 488 ) ................................................... ................................................................. matearis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 378)

Subkey G

G1 [42] Gaster 3.1× as long as wide and Gt 1-4 with a smooth median line ( Fig. 578 ) ....... ..................................................... perasphondyliae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 439)

– Gaster 1.4–2.8× as long as wide and Gt 1-4 without a smooth median line..........2

G2 (1) Antennal clava asymmetric (Fig. 1056) ............... ajax Hansson sp.nov. (p. 215)

– Antennal clava symmetric...................................................................................3

G3 (2) Antenna with funiculars short, F2 1.0–1.5× and F3 1.0–1.2× as long as wide...4

– Antenna with F2 1.6–2.1× and F3 1.3–1.8× as long as wide..............................9

G4 (3) Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation/rugosity, hence dull ( Fig. 480) ...................................................... malandrina Hansson sp.nov. (p. 372)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation and shiny (e.g. Fig. 274 ) .......................................................................................................................5

G5 (4) Weakly metallic species (e.g. Fig. 590 ) ..............................................................6

– Bright metallic species (e.g. Fig. 500 ) ................................................................8

G6 (5) Gastral tergites with relatively weak reticulation with small meshes ( Fig. 590 ) .. ....................................................................... preta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 448)

– Gastral tergites with very strong reticulation with large meshes ( Figs 274 , 508 ) .......................................................................................................................7

G7 (6) Antennal flagellum longer, e.g. F1 1.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 741 ); gaster 2.5× as long as wide with dorsal part predominantly dark brown with metallic tinges ( Fig. 274 ) ......................................................... anis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 229)

– Antennal flagellum shorter, e.g. F1 1.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 840 ); gaster 1.6× as long as wide with dorsal part metallic bluish-green ( Fig. 508 ) ....................... ................................................................... miliaris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 391)

G8 (5) Mesoscutum with sidelobes golden-green and midlobe golden-red, mesoscutellum and propodeum golden-red ( Fig. 500 ) ....... mesana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 385)

– Mesosoma metallic bluish-green with golden tinges ( Fig. 570 ) ........................... ..................................................................... pardis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 434)

G9 (3) Mesoscutellum with median part narrow, 3.9–4.6× as long as wide ................10

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.2–3.6× as long as wide .............................12

G10 (9) Gastral tergites with weak reticulation ( Fig. 490 ) ................................................. ....................................................................... maya Hansson sp.nov. (p. 379)

– Gastral tergites with strong reticulation ( Figs 274 , 596 ) ..................................11

G11 (10) Mesoscutellum with median part rugose ( Fig. 596 ); mesosoma black with metallic tinges ( Fig. 596 ) ...................................... roupalae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 452)

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation ( Fig. 274 ); mesosoma metallic bluish-green ( Fig. 274 ) ...................... anis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 229)

G12 (9) Mesoscutellum with median part rugose ( Figs 270 ).........................................13

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak to strong reticulation ..................14

G13 (12) Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ); gaster 2.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 270 ) .................. amphis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 226)

– Medio-basal part of Gt 1 with a sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ); gaster 2.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 502 ) ........ methea Hansson sp.nov. (p. 387)

G14 (12) Mesoscutellum with median part with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 534 )........15

– Mesoscutellum with median part with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 468 ) .........21

G15 (14) Mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide, without median groove .........................16

– Mesoscutellum 1.0–1.2× as long as wide, with or without a weak to strong and complete median groove, if median groove is missing then mesoscutellum is 1.2× as long as wide ....................................................................................17

G16 (15) Mesoscutellum convex ( Figs 534, 535 ); gastral tergites with weak reticulation ( Fig. 534 ) ................................................... neotropicalis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 409)

– Mesoscutellum flat ( Figs 282, 283 ); gastral tergites with strong reticulation ( Fig. 282 ) ............................................................. aramis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 234)

G17 (15) Mesoscutellum with median part 3.4–3.5× as long as wide; gaster 1.8 or 2.8× as long as wide.................................................................................................18

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.4–2.9× as long as wide; gaster 1.8–2.2× as long as wide.........................................................................................................19

G18 (17) Gaster 2.8× as long as wide with weak reticulation ( Fig. 388 ) ............................. ........................................................................ falla Hansson sp.nov. (p. 307)

– Gaster 1.8× as long as wide with strong reticulation ( Fig. 276 ) ........................... ..................................................................... anysia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 230)

G19 (17) Mesoscutellum with median part 2.9× as long as wide ( Fig. 478 ); gonoplac yellowish-brown ( Fig. 479 ) ................................... majalis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 371)

– Mesoscutellum with median part 2.4–2.5× as long as wide; gonoplac dark brown to black ........................................................................................................20

G20 (19) Antennal clava 3.1× as long as wide with a long spicule ( Fig. 859 ) .................... ................................................................... pagana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 430)

– Antennal clava 2.5× as long as wide with a short spicule ( Fig. 734 ) ................... .................................................................... adobia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 212)

G21 (14) Body dark brown non-metallic ( Fig. 468 ) ... lumbrada Hansson sp.nov. (p. 364)

– Body with at least metallic tinges on mesoscutellum .......................................22

G22 (21) Gaster 1.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 464 ) ................ liria Hansson sp.nov. (p. 361)

– Gaster 1.6–2.2× as long as wide .......................................................................23

G23 (22) Fore wing with costal setal row broken (as in Fig. 36 ) ......................................... ................................................................ cecropiae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 269)

– Fore wing with costal setal row unbroken (as in Fig. 35 ).................................24

G24 (23) Gastral tergites with very strong reticulation with large meshes ( Fig. 392 ) ......... ....................................................................... fieris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 310)

– Gastral tergites with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 650 ) and/or small meshes ....25

G25 (24) Median carina of propodeum ±triangular ( Fig. 650 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 without longitudinal carinae; gaster with dorsal part convex ( Figs 650, 651 ) ............. ........................................................................ multisulcata (Girault) (p. 200)

– Median carina of propodeum predominantly with parallel sides, expanding in posterior one-third; medio-basal part of Gt 1 with longitudinal carinae (as in Figs 27, 28 ); gaster with dorsal part ±flat, or convex..........................................26

G26 (25) Gaster with apex pointed and Gt 2-4 with weak reticulation ( Fig. 442 ) .................. ............................................................ kateperezae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 346)

– Gaster with apex blunt and Gt 2-4 with strong reticulation ( Figs 430 , 520 ) .......27

G27 (26) Antenna longer ( Fig. 804 ), F3 1.9× and clava 3.2× as long as wide .................... ...................................................................... intesa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 338)

– Antenna shorter (Fig. 1083), F3 1.4× and clava 2.5× as long as wide ................. .................................................................... munda Hansson sp.nov. (p. 399)

Subkey H

H1 [50] Gaster 2.8–3.2× as long as wide .........................................................................2

– Gaster 1.4–2.6× as long as wide .........................................................................4

H2 (1) Gonoplac long, 1.0× as long as hind femur ( Fig. 361 ) ......................................... .............................................................. cuscoensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 289)

– Gonoplac 0.7× as long as hind femur .................................................................3

H3 (2) Body bright metallic ( Fig. 600 ); median part of mesoscutellum 3.0× as long as wide ( Fig. 600 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum curved ( Fig. 600 ) ............. ................................................................... scarpia Hansson sp.nov. (p. 454)

– Body dark brown with weak metallic tinges ( Fig. 396 ); median part of mesoscutellum 2.7× as long as wide ( Fig. 396 ); submedian grooves on mesoscutellum ±straight ( Fig. 396 ) ....................................... folata Hansson sp.nov. (p. 313)

H4 (1) Dorsellum completely hidden under mesoscutellum in dorsal view ( Fig. 416 ), and midlobe of mesoscutum predominantly metallic purplish with parts close to notauli metallic bluish-purple and mesoscutellum metallic bluish-purple ( Fig. 416 ) ......................................................... gutierrezi Hansson sp.nov. (p. 327)

– Dorsellum at least partly visible in dorsal view, or mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with same colour, metallic or black non-metallic .........................................5

H5 (4) Dorsellum without a median carina ....................................................................6

– Dorsellum with a median carina .......................................................................13

H6 (5) Mesoscutellum metallic bluish-purple, or bluish-green......................................7

– Mesoscutellum dark brown to black, with or without weak metallic tinges ......8

H7 (6) Mesoscutellum metallic bluish-purple ( Fig. 492 ) ................................................. .................................................................. medrosa Hansson sp.nov. (p. 380)

– Mesoscutellum bright metallic bluish-green ( Fig. 650 ) ........................................ ........................................................................ multisulcata (Girault) (p. 200)

H8 (6) Mesoscutellum 0.9× as long as wide with very elongate meshes, appearing striate ( Fig. 368 ); medio-basal part of Gt 1 with transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ) ........................................................... diriaensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 294)

– Mesoscutellum 0.8 or 1.0–1.1× as long as wide with less elongate meshes; medio-basal part of Gt 1 without transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 23 ).................9

H9 (8) Mesoscutellum 0.8× as long as wide, ±flattened ( Fig. 314 ) ................................. ................................................ briannestjacquesae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 256)

– Mesoscutellum 1.0–1.1× as long as wide, more convex...................................10

H10 (9) Antennal flagellum stout and short ( Fig. 863 ), e.g. F3 1.1× and clava 2.2× as long as wide ........................................................... preta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 448)

– Antennal flagellum slender, F3 1.6–1.8× and clava 3.5–4.1× as long as wide..... .....................................................................................................................11

H11 (10) Median part of propodeum with strong reticulation, without carinae ( Fig. 242 ); median part of mesoscutellum with strong reticulation, dull ( Fig. 242 ) ......... ........................................................................ abra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 208)

– Median part of propodeum with a mix of carinae and reticulation; median part of mesoscutellum with very weak reticulation, shiny .....................................12

H12 (11) Gonoplac yellowish-brown ( Fig. 483 ); gaster 1.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 482 ) ... .................................................................... manga Hansson sp.nov. (p. 374)

– Gonoplac black ( Fig. 303 ); gaster 1.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 302 ) ...................... ...................................................................... bestis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 247)

H13 (5) Gt 1 with weak reticulation (e.g. Fig. 400 ).........................................................14

– Gt 1 with strong reticulation (e.g. Fig. 470 ) .......................................................19

H14 (13) Propodeal callus with 7–10 setae......................................................................15

– Propodeal callus with 2–4 setae ........................................................................16

H15 (14) Gonoplac black to dark brown ( Fig. 401 ) ............................................................. ............................................................. gigantensis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 316)

– Gonoplac yellowish-brown ( Fig. 655 ) ...................... cuprea (Ashmead) (p. 194)

H16 (14) Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum subdivided by transverse carinae ( Fig. 650 ) ................................................................. multisulcata (Girault) (p. 200)

– Submedian grooves on mesoscutellum without transverse carinae..................17

H17 (16) Mesoscutellum without median groove ( Fig. 570 ); gaster 1.8× as long as wide ( Fig. 570 ) .............................................................. pardis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 434)

– Mesoscutellum with a ±complete median groove; gaster 2.2–2.5× as long as wide .............................................................................................................18

H18 (17) Gt 7 1.0× as long as width at base; mesoscutellum 1.2× as long as wide ( Fig. 322 ); antennal clava 3.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 758 ) ............................................... ................................................................ burreadis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 261)

– Gt 7 1.3× as long as width at base; mesoscutellum 1.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 512 ); antennal clava 2.6× as long as wide (Fig. 1082) ............................................. ................................................................... moleris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 393)

H19 (13) Gonoplac with apex yellowish-brown to dark brown ( Fig. 471 ) .......................... ................................................................. lunaniae Hansson sp.nov. (p. 365)

– Gonoplac completely black...............................................................................20

H20 (19) Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum golden-green, or metallic bluish-green ........21

– Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum black non-metallic, or with weak metallic tinges..................................................................................................................25

H21 (20) Gaster 1.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 250 ) ............. agonis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 213)

– Gaster 1.9–2.5× as long as wide .......................................................................22

H22 (21) Gaster 1.9× as long as wide with dorsal surface ±flat ( Fig. 254 ) .......................... .................................................................. alambra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 216)

– Gaster 2.1–2.5× as long as wide with dorsal surface convex ...........................23

H23 (22) Median part of mesoscutellum strongly reticulate and with less elongate meshes than in alternate ( Fig. 564 ); medio-basal Gt 1 with a sharp transverse edge dorsally (as in Fig. 24 ) ............................................ pagana Hansson sp.nov. (p. 430)

– Median part of mesoscutellum with relatively weak reticulation and with meshes more elongate than in alternate ( Fig. 354 ); medio-basal Gt 1 without a sharp transverse edge dorsally, but can have a sharp edge shaped like an inverted U (as in Fig. 42 ) ..............................................................................................24

H24 (23) Median part of propodeum with irregular carinae ( Fig. 354 ); gaster 2.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 354 ) ........................................... crabra Hansson sp.nov. (p. 285)

– Median part of propodeum predominantly with strong reticulation ( Fig. 544 ); gaster 2.5× as long as wide ( Fig. 544 ) ................. noblitis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 417)

H25 (20) Antenna with F1 1.3× as long as F2, and F3 1.1× as long as wide ( Fig. 863 ) ...... ....................................................................... preta Hansson sp.nov. (p. 448)

– Antenna with F1 0.9× as long as F2, and F3 1.4–1.8× as long as wide............26

H26 (25) Mesoscutellum black non-metallic ( Fig. 494 ) ...................................................... ............................................................... melasoma Hansson sp.nov. (p. 381)

– Mesoscutellum metallic greenish-blue ( Figs 264 , 322 ) ....................................27

H27 (26) Gaster 1.6× as long as wide ( Fig. 264 ) ............. alloris Hansson sp.nov. (p. 222)

– Gaster 2.4× as long as wide ( Fig. 322 ) ........ burreadis Hansson sp.nov. (p. 261)

Figures

Figs 724–732. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (724) Galeopsomyia springerae; (725) G. corista; (726) G. fuga; (727) G. lama; (728) G. amadea; (729) G. rosea; (730) G. insignis; (731) G. admirabilis; (732) G. abra.

Figs 760–767. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (760) Galeopsomyia cararaensis; (761) G. carballoi; (762) G. cecropiae; (763) G. bimaculata; (764) G. carinifer; (765) G. cernia; (766) G. chrysops; (767) G. clematisae.

Figs 324–327. Galeopsomyia cararaensis, holotype ♀ – (324) habitus dorsal view; (325) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia carballoi, holotype ♀ – (326) habitus dorsal view; (327) habitus lateral view.

Figs 232–235. Galeopsomyia admirabilis, holotype ♀ – (232) habitus dorsal view; (233) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia insignis, holotype ♀ – (234) habitus dorsal view; (235) habitus lateral view.

Figs 112–115. Galeopsomyia gala, holotype ♀ – (112) habitus dorsal view; (113) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia gallarum, holotype ♀ – (114) habitus dorsal view; (115) habitus lateral view.

Figs 588–591. Galeopsomyia piperae, holotype ♀ – (588) habitus dorsal view; (589) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia preta, holotype ♀ – (590) habitus dorsal view; (591) habitus lateral view.

Figs 304–307. Galeopsomyia bicolor, holotype ♀ – (304) habitus dorsal view; (305) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia bimaculata, holotype ♀ – (306) habitus dorsal view; (307) habitus lateral view.

Figs 640–643. Galeopsomyia aspratilis, holotype ♀ – (640) habitus dorsal view; (641) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia curiosa, holotype ♀ – (642) habitus dorsal view; (643) habitus lateral view.

Figs 212–215. Galeopsomyia corista, holotype ♀ – (212) habitus dorsal view; (213) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia elegans, holotype ♀ – (214) habitus dorsal view; (215) habitus lateral view.

Figs 23–28. Galeopsomyia spp., ♀, first gastral tergite (Gt1) dorsal view – (23) G. epidius; (24) G. osaensis; (25) G. fausta; (26) G. blakeae; (27) G. illydris; (28) G.devania.

Figs 628–631. Galeopsomyia capillosa, holotype ♀ – (628) habitus dorsal view; (629) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia gobis, holotype ♀ – (630) habitus dorsal view; (631) habitus lateral view.

Figs 636–639. Galeopsomyia papillosa, holotype ♀ – (636) habitus dorsal view; (637) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia scabiosa, holotype ♀ – (638) habitus dorsal view; (639) habitus lateral view.

Figs 684–688. Galeopsomyia macaxeira Perioto, Costa & Lara, ♀ – (684) head frontal view, ht; (685) mesosoma and head dorsal view, ht; (686) propodeum dorsal view, pt; (687) gaster lateral view, pt; (688) gaster dorsal view, pt.

Figs 240–243. Galeopsomyia morula, holotype ♀ – (240) habitus dorsal view; (241) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia abra, holotype ♀ – (242) habitus dorsal view; (243) habitus lateral view.

Figs 244–247. Galeopsomyia abraxas, holotype ♀ – (244) habitus dorsal view; (245) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia actis, holotype ♀ – (246) habitus dorsal view; (247) habitus lateral view.

Figs 572–575. Galeopsomyia patina, holotype ♀ – (572) habitus dorsal view; (573) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia pava, holotype ♀ – (574) habitus dorsal view; (575) habitus lateral view.

Figs 568–571. Galeopsomyia palotis, holotype ♀ – (568) habitus dorsal view; (569) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia pardis, holotype ♀ – (570) habitus dorsal view; (571) habitus lateral view.

Figs 915–923. Mesoscutellum dorsal view, holotype ♀ – (915) Galeopsomyia nebulosa; (916) G. chrysops; (917) G. daleskeyae; (918) G. ajax; (919) G. philodendrae; (920) G. maculifer; (921) G. aramis; (922) G. hiata; (923) G. palotis.

Figs 660–663. Galeopsomyia fausta La Salle, holotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458207) – (660) habitus dorsal view; (661) habitus lateral view. Tetrastichus haemon Walker, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458202) – (662) habitus dorsal view; (663) habitus lateral view.

Figs 924–932. Mesoscutellum dorsal view, holotype ♀ – (924) Galeopsomyia anomala; (925) G. asilis; (926) G. admirabilis; (927) G. hirsuta; (928) G. hirta; (929) G. papillosa; (930) G. curiosa; (931) G. scabiosa; (932) G. capillosa.

Figs 596–599. Galeopsomyia roupalae, holotype ♀ – (596) habitus dorsal view; (597) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia rugosa, holotype ♀ – (598) habitus dorsal view; (599) habitus lateral view.

Figs 420–423. Galeopsomyia hiata, holotype ♀ – (420) habitus dorsal view; (421) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia idris, holotype ♀ – (422) habitus dorsal view; (423) habitus lateral view.

Figs 448–451. Galeopsomyia ladrona, holotype ♀ – (448) habitus dorsal view; (449) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lapsa, holotype ♀ – (450) habitus dorsal view; (451) habitus lateral view.

Figs 632–635. Galeopsomyia hirsuta, holotype ♀ – (632) habitus dorsal view; (633) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia hirta, holotype ♀ – (634) habitus dorsal view; (635) habitus lateral view.

Figs 644–647. Galeopsomyia alveolus, holotype ♀ – (644) habitus dorsal view; (645) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia asilis, holotype ♀ – (646) habitus dorsal view; (647) habitus lateral view.

Figs 580–583. Galeopsomyia perla, holotype ♀ – (580) habitus dorsal view; (581) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia philodendrae, holotype ♀ – (582) habitus dorsal view; (583) habitus lateral view.

Figs 472–475. Galeopsomyia macanis, holotype ♀ – (472) habitus dorsal view; (473) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia maculifer, holotype ♀ – (474) habitus dorsal view; (475) habitus lateral view.

Figs 15–22. Galeopsomyia spp., ♀. 15–17. Head lateral view – (15) G. seminarum; (16) G. noyesi (arrow pointing at short genal carina); (17) G. graciliclava (arrow pointing at long genal carina). 18–19. Fore coxa lateral view – (18) G. myrsineae (arrow pointing at carina along anterior margin); (19) G. alas (arrow pointing at carina along posterior margin). 20–21. Hind coxa lateral view – (20) G. noyesi; (21) G. aliosa (arrow pointing at carina along posterior margin). 22. G. carinifer, dorsellum (arrow pointing at median carina).

Figs 35–43. Galeopsomyia spp., ♀. 35–36. Base of fore wing with ventral setal row in costal cell – (35) G. illydris, row unbroken; (36) G. osaensis, row broken. 37–38. Antenna lateral view – (37) G. noyesi, solid antennal clava; (38) G. illydris, with distinct constriction between C1 and C2. 39–40. Apex of gaster lateral view – (39) G. illydris; (40) G. flora. 41–43. First gastral tergite (Gt1) dorsal view – (41) G. saga, arrow pointing at medio-basal carina; (42) G. pagana, arrow pointing at medio-basal sharp edge; (43) G. druparum, arrows pointing at ovate flat areas.

Figs 236–239. Galeopsomyia blendis, holotype ♀ – (236) habitus dorsal view; (237) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia maura, holotype ♀ – (238) habitus dorsal view; (239) habitus lateral view.

Figs 404–407. Galeopsomyia globosa, holotype ♀ – (404) habitus dorsal view; (405) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia gonzalezi, holotype ♀ – (406) habitus dorsal view; (407) habitus lateral view.

Figs 428–431. Galeopsomyia ingae, holotype ♀ – (428) habitus dorsal view; (429) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia intesa, holotype ♀ – (430) habitus dorsal view; (431) habitus lateral view.

Figs 228–231. Galeopsomyia rosea, holotype ♀ – (228) habitus dorsal view; (229) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia anomala, holotype ♀ – (230) habitus dorsal view; (231) habitus lateral view.

Figs 308–311. Galeopsomyia blakeae, holotype ♀ – (308) habitus dorsal view; (309) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia boria, holotype ♀ – (310) habitus dorsal view; (311) habitus lateral view.

Figs 532–535. Galeopsomyia nebulosa, holotype ♀ – (532) habitus dorsal view; (533) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia neotropicalis, holotype ♀ – (534) habitus dorsal view; (535) habitus lateral view.

Figs 540–543. Galeopsomyia nishidai, holotype ♀ – (540) habitus dorsal view; (541) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia nitida, holotype ♀ – (542) habitus dorsal view; (543) habitus lateral view.

Figs 528–531. Galeopsomyia navia, holotype ♀ – (528) habitus dorsal view; (529) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia neblina, holotype ♀ – (530) habitus dorsal view; (531) habitus lateral view.

Figs 412–415. Galeopsomyia grandis, holotype ♀ – (412) habitus dorsal view; (413) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia gridis, holotype ♀ – (414) habitus dorsal view; (415) habitus lateral view.

Figs 733–741. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (733) Galeopsomyia actis; (734) G. adobia; (735) G. agonis; (736) G. alanis; (737) G. alegra; (738) G. aliante; (739) G. altura; (740) G. amyra; (741) G. anis.

Figs 456–459. Galeopsomyia lema, holotype ♀ – (456) habitus dorsal view; (457) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lemuris, holotype ♀ – (458) habitus dorsal view; (459) habitus lateral view.

Figs 356–359. Galeopsomyia criniera, holotype ♀ – (356) habitus dorsal view; (357) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia crotonae, holotype ♀ – (358) habitus dorsal view; (359) habitus lateral view.

Figs 664–667. Tetrastichus nicaraguaensis Cameron, lectotype ♀ (petiole & gaster missing) (NHMUK 010838711) – (664) habitus dorsal view; (665) habitus lateral view. Tetrastichus Scadius Walker, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 010838710) – (666) habitus dorsal view; (667) habitus lateral view.

Figs 808–817. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (808) Galeopsomyia ingae; (809) G. juni; (810) G. lacinia; (811) G. loboi; (812) G. lemuris; (813) G. latosa; (814) G. lealis; (815) G. lema; (816) G. liria; (817) G. limonensis.

Figs 784–790. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (784) Galeopsomyia eridana; (785) G. evgenyzakharovi; (786) G. elisia; (787) G. eximia; (788) G. faina; (789) G. falla; (790) G. fernandezi.

Figs 388–391. Galeopsomyia falla, holotype ♀ – (388) habitus dorsal view; (389) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia fernandezi, holotype ♀ – (390) habitus dorsal view; (391) habitus lateral view.

Figs 818–826. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (818) Galeopsomyia leonae; (819) G. macanis; (820) G. maculifer; (821) G. lunaniae; (822) G. lumbrada; (823) G. magra; (824) G. malandrina; (825) G. manga; (826) G. manotris.

Figs 476–479. Galeopsomyia magra, holotype ♀ – (476) habitus dorsal view; (477) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia majalis, holotype ♀ – (478) habitus dorsal view; (479) habitus lateral view.

Figs 680–683. Galeopsomopsis transcarinatus Gahan, holotype ♀ (USNM type no. 22303) – (680) habitus dorsal view; (681) habitus lateral view. Trichoporus viridicyaneus Ashmead, lectotype ♀ (USNM type no. 8099) – (682) habitus dorsal view; (683) habitus lateral view.

Figs 656–659. Cirrospilus Deilochus Walker, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 010838709) – (656) habitus dorsal view; (657) habitus lateral view. Tetrastichus epidius Walker, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458201) – (658) habitus dorsal view; (659) habitus lateral view.

Figs 408–411. Galeopsomyia gouaniae, holotype ♀ – (408) habitus dorsal view; (409) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia graciliclava, holotype ♀ – (410) habitus dorsal view; (411) habitus lateral view.

Figs 616–619. Galeopsomyia ventrosa, holotype ♀ – (616) habitus dorsal view; (617) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia verbesinae, holotype ♀ – (618) habitus dorsal view; (619) habitus lateral view.

Figs 372–375. Galeopsomyia edera, holotype ♀ – (372) habitus dorsal view; (373) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia elisia, holotype ♀ – (374) habitus dorsal view; (375) habitus lateral view.

Figs 608–611. Galeopsomyia triozae, holotype ♀ – (608) habitus dorsal view; (609) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia truncata, holotype ♀ – (610) habitus dorsal view; (611) habitus lateral view.

Figs 276–279. Galeopsomyia anysia, holotype ♀ – (276) habitus dorsal view; (277) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia apicis, holotype ♀ – (278) habitus dorsal view; (279) habitus lateral view.

Figs 284–287. Galeopsomyia arenalicola, holotype ♀ – (284) habitus dorsal view; (285) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia artis, holotype ♀ – (286) habitus dorsal view; (287) habitus lateral view.

Figs 604–607. Galeopsomyia teronadis, holotype ♀ – (604) habitus dorsal view; (605) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia tigrensis, holotype ♀ – (606) habitus dorsal view; (607) habitus lateral view.

Figs 872–878. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (872) Galeopsomyia triozae; (873) G. tigrensis; (874) G. umanai; (875) G. veluda; (876) G. truncata; (877) G. wilsonae; (878) G. verbesinae.

Figs 592–595. Galeopsomyia pyrillia, holotype ♀ – (592) habitus dorsal view; (593) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia reticulata, holotype ♀ – (594) habitus dorsal view; (595) habitus lateral view.

Figs 508–511. Galeopsomyia miliaris, holotype ♀ – (508) habitus dorsal view; (509) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia miria, holotype ♀ – (510) habitus dorsal view; (511) habitus lateral view.

Figs 360–363. Galeopsomyia cuscoensis, holotype ♀ – (360) habitus dorsal view; (361) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia cyaneoviridis, holotype ♀ – (362) habitus dorsal view; (363) habitus lateral view.

Figs 300–303. Galeopsomyia beltanis, holotype ♀ – (300) habitus dorsal view; (301) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia bestis, holotype ♀ – (302) habitus dorsal view; (303) habitus lateral view.

Figs 742–750. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (742) Galeopsomyia alambra; (743) G. anysia; (744) G. arada; (745) G. artis; (746) G. aureoviridis; (747) G. ambigua; (748) G. avis; (749) G. bariolis; (750) G. beltanis.

Figs 672–675. Tetrastichodes flavipes Howard, holotype ♀ (USNM type no. 10116) – (672) habitus dorsal view; (673) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomopsis multisulcata Girault, lectotype ♀ (head missing) (USNM type no. 20660) – (674) habitus dorsal view; (675) habitus lateral view.

Figs 560–563. Galeopsomyia osaensis, holotype ♀ – (560) habitus dorsal view; (561) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia osmia, holotype ♀ – (562) habitus dorsal view; (563) habitus lateral view.

Figs 248–251. Galeopsomyia adobia, holotype ♀ – (248) habitus dorsal view; (249) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia agonis, holotype ♀ – (250) habitus dorsal view; (251) habitus lateral view.

Figs 340–343. Galeopsomyia clematisae, holotype ♀ – (340) habitus dorsal view; (341) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia coccolobae, holotype ♀ – (342) habitus dorsal view; (343) habitus lateral view.

Figs 332–335. Galeopsomyia cecropiae, holotype ♀ – (332) habitus dorsal view; (333) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia cernia, holotype ♀ – (334) habitus dorsal view; (335) habitus lateral view.

Figs 544–547. Galeopsomyia noblitis, holotype ♀ – (544) habitus dorsal view; (545) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia oasis, holotype ♀ – (546) habitus dorsal view; (547) habitus lateral view.

Figs 260–263. Galeopsomyia aliante, holotype ♀ – (260) habitus dorsal view; (261) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia allisonbrownae, holotype ♀ – (262) habitus dorsal view; (263) habitus lateral view.

Figs 676–679. Gyrolasia nigrocyaneusAshmead, lectotype ♀ (USNM type no. 8099) – (676) habitus dorsal view; (677) habitus lateral view. Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead, lectotype ♀ (USNM type no. 60566) – (678) habitus dorsal view; (679) habitus lateral view.

Figs 376–379. Galeopsomyia eolio, holotype ♀ – (376) habitus dorsal view; (377) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia eridana, holotype ♀ – (378) habitus dorsal view; (379) habitus lateral view.

Figs 172–175. Galeopsomyia perseae, holotype ♀ – (172) habitus dorsal view; (173) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia peruviensis, holotype ♀ – (174) habitus dorsal view; (175) habitus lateral view.

Figs 184–187. Galeopsomyia saga, holotype ♀ – (184) habitus dorsal view; (185) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia santarosensis, holotype ♀ – (186) habitus dorsal view; (187) habitus lateral view.

Figs 124–127. Galeopsomyia herediensis, holotype ♀ – (124) habitus dorsal view; (125) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia iangauldi, holotype ♀ – (126) habitus dorsal view; (127) habitus lateral view.

Figs 96–99. Galeopsomyia duniagarciae, holotype ♀ – (96) habitus dorsal view; (97) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia eberhardi, holotype ♀ – (98) habitus dorsal view; (99) habitus lateral view.

Figs 180–183. Galeopsomyia ramyamanjunathae, holotype ♀ – (180) habitus dorsal view; (181) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia rubii, holotype ♀ – (182) habitus dorsal view; (183) habitus lateral view.

Figs 188–191. Galeopsomyia seminarum, holotype ♀ – (188) habitus dorsal view; (189) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia springerae, holotype ♀ – (190) habitus dorsal view; (191) habitus lateral view.

Figs 56–59. Galeopsomyia azofeifai, holotype ♀ – (56) habitus dorsal view; (57) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia beltearis, holotype ♀ – (58) habitus dorsal view; (59) habitus lateral view.

Figs 885–896. Head frontal view, ♀ – (885) Galeopsomyia fucata ht; (886) G. loboi ht; (887) G. epidius n-t; (888) G. rubii pt; (889) G. lasallei pt; (890) G. rosea ht; (891) G. admirabilis ht; (892) G. copala pt; (893) G. grandis pt; (894) G. illydris pt; (895) G. lemuris pt; (896) G. montanis pt.

Figs 152–155. Galeopsomyia maniata, holotype ♀ – (152) habitus dorsal view; (153) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia manuelpereirai, holotype ♀ – (154) habitus dorsal view; (155) habitus lateral view.

Figs 898–906. Head frontal view, ♀ – (898) Galeopsomyia multisulcata n-t; (899) G. capillosa ht; (900) G. hirsuta ht; (901) G. papillosa ht; (902) G. scabiosa ht; (903) G. aspratilis pt; (904) G. asilis pt; (905) G. manuelperereirai ht, head lateral view; (906) G. estera ht, head lateral view.

Figs 104–107. Galeopsomyia ferula, holotype ♀ – (104) habitus dorsal view; (105) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia fresa, holotype ♀ – (106) habitus dorsal view; (107) habitus lateral view.

Figs 60–63. Galeopsomyia bentoni, holotype ♀ – (60) habitus dorsal view; (61) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia bidensiae, holotype ♀ – (62) habitus dorsal view; (63) habitus lateral view.

Figs 192–195. Galeopsomyia sureshnaiki, holotype ♀ – (192) habitus dorsal view; (193) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia talamancaensis, holotype ♀ – (194) habitus dorsal view; (195) habitus lateral view.

Figs 148–151. Galeopsomyia malia, holotype ♀ – (148) habitus dorsal view; (149) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia mandria, holotype ♀ – (150) habitus dorsal view; (151) habitus lateral view.

Figs 44–47. Galeopsomyia abatis ♀ – (44) habitus dorsal view, paratype; (45) habitus lateral view, holotype. Galeopsomyia aciana, holotype ♀ – (46) habitus dorsal view; (47) habitus lateral view.

Figs 999–1005. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (999) Galeopsomyia abatis; (1000) G. alas; (1001) G. druparum; (1002) G. beltearis; (1003) G. caribeae; (1004) G. casacocaensis; (1005) G. collina.

Figs 88–91. Galeopsomyia crucensis, holotype ♀ – (88) habitus dorsal view; (89) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia domingoensis, holotype ♀ – (90) habitus dorsal view; (91) habitus lateral view.

Figs 136–139. Galeopsomyia jimenezi, holotype ♀ – (136) habitus dorsal view; (137) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia labilis, holotype ♀ – (138) habitus dorsal view; (139) habitus lateral view.

Figs 52–55. Galeopsomyia altamiraensis, holotype ♀ – (52) habitus dorsal view; (53) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia aronia, holotype ♀ – (54) habitus dorsal view; (55) habitus lateral view.

Figs 80–83. Galeopsomyia cissusae, holotype ♀ – (80) habitus dorsal view; (81) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia collina, holotype ♀ – (82) habitus dorsal view; (83) habitus lateral view.

Figs 689–694. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (689) Galeopsomyia aciana; (690) G. aliosa; (691) G. aronia; (692) G. altamiraensis; (693) G. azofeifai; (694) G. blancaensis.

Figs 710–716. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (710) Galeopsomyia janzeni; (711) G. monteverdensis; (712) G. jimenezi; (713) G. labilis; (714) G. manuelperereira; (715) G. mimosa; (716) G. mogensenae.

Figs 92–95. Galeopsomyia doradis, holotype ♀ – (92) habitus dorsal view; (93) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia druparum, holotype ♀ – (94) habitus dorsal view; (95) habitus lateral view.

Figs 702–709. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (702) Galeopsomyia carinata; (703) G. estera; (704) G. hallwachsae; (705) G. domingoensis; (706) G. herediensis; (707) G. harryramirezi; (708) G. iangauldi; (709) G. itabunaensis.

Figs 200–203. Galeopsomyia valmiri, holotype ♀ – (200) habitus dorsal view; (201) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia verdensis, holotype ♀ – (202) habitus dorsal view; (203) habitus lateral view.

Figs 168–171. Galeopsomyia noyesi, holotype ♀ – (168) habitus dorsal view; (169) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia pelora, holotype ♀ – (170) habitus dorsal view; (171) habitus lateral view.

Figs 76–79. Galeopsomyia carinata, holotype ♀ – (76) habitus dorsal view; (77) habitus lat- eral view. Galeopsomyia casacocaensis, holotype ♀ – (78) habitus dorsal view; (79) habitus lateral view.

Figs 140–143. Galeopsomyia lapra, holotype ♀ – (140) habitus dorsal view; (141) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia larshuggerti, holotype ♀ – (142) habitus dorsal view; (143) habitus lateral view.

Figs 160–163. Galeopsomyia miopis, holotype ♀ – (160) habitus dorsal view; (161) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia mogensenae, holotype ♀ – (162) habitus dorsal view; (163) habitus lateral view.

Figs 132–135. Galeopsomyia itabunaensis, holotype ♀ – (132) habitus dorsal view; (133) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia janzeni, holotype ♀ – (134) habitus dorsal view; (135) habitus lateral view.

Figs 196–199. Galeopsomyia tandayapaensis, holotype ♀ – (196) habitus dorsal view; (197) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia trinidadensis, holotype ♀ – (198) habitus dorsal view; (199) habitus lateral view.

Figs 116–119. Galeopsomyia guanacastensis, holotype ♀ – (116) habitus dorsal view; (117) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia guillermopereirai, holotype ♀ – (118) habitus dorsal view; (119) habitus lateral view.

Figs 668–671. Tetrastichus sulcatus Howard, holotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458203) – (668) habitus dorsal view; (669) habitus lateral view. Cirrospilus Valerus Walker, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458206) – (670) habitus dorsal view; (671) habitus lateral view.

Figs 72–75. Galeopsomyia candica, holotype ♀ – (72) habitus dorsal view; (73) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia caribeae, holotype ♀ – (74) habitus dorsal view; (75) habitus lateral view.

Figs 652–655. Tetrastichodes compactus Howard, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458204) – (652) habitus dorsal view; (653) habitus lateral view. Tetrastichus cupreus Ashmead, lectotype ♀ (NHMUK 013458205) – (654) habitus dorsal view; (655) habitus lateral view.

Figs 695–701. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (695) Galeopsomyia bentoni; (696) G. brasiliensis; (697) G. cabroensis; (698) G. bidensiae; (699) G. camachoi; (700) G. candica; (701) G. cissusae.

Figs 156–159. Galeopsomyia marea, holotype ♀ – (156) habitus dorsal view; (157) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia mimosa, holotype ♀ – (158) habitus dorsal view; (159) habitus lateral view.

Figs 128–131. Galeopsomyia ibis, holotype ♀ – (128) habitus dorsal view; (129) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia incisa, holotype ♀ – (130) habitus dorsal view; (131) habitus lateral view.

Figs 120–123. Galeopsomyia hallwachsae, holotype ♀ – (120) habitus dorsal view; (121) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia harryramirezi, holotype ♀ – (122) habitus dorsal view; (123) habitus lateral view.

Figs 64–67. Galeopsomyia blancaensis, holotype ♀ – (64) habitus dorsal view; (65) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia brasiliensis, holotype ♀ – (66) habitus dorsal view; (67) habitus lateral view.

Figs 204–207. Galeopsomyia volcanensis, holotype ♀ – (204) habitus dorsal view; (205) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia zunigai, holotype ♀ – (206) habitus dorsal view; (207) habitus lateral view.

Figs 68–71. Galeopsomyia cabroensis, holotype ♀ – (68) habitus dorsal view; (69) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia camachoi – (70) habitus dorsal view, paratype; (71) habitus lateral view, holotype.

Figs 208–211. Galeopsomyia amadea, holotype ♀ – (208) habitus dorsal view; (209) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia coralis, holotype ♀ – (210) habitus dorsal view; (211) habitus lateral view.

Figs 216–219. Galeopsomyia eroica, holotype ♀ – (216) habitus dorsal view; (217) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia fabia, holotype ♀ – (218) habitus dorsal view; (219) habitus lateral view.

Figs 220–223. Galeopsomyia fuga, holotype ♀ – (220) habitus dorsal view; (221) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lama, holotype ♀ – (222) habitus dorsal view; (223) habitus lateral view.

Figs 224–227. Galeopsomyia lasallei, holotype ♀ – (224) habitus dorsal view; (225) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia mynta, holotype ♀ – (226) habitus dorsal view; (227) habitus lateral view.

Figs 850–855. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (850) Galeopsomyia myrsineae; (851) G. osaensis; (852) G. nishidai; (853) G. noblitis; (854) G. opala; (855) G. opima.

Figs 328–331. Galeopsomyia carbonis, holotype ♀ – (328) habitus dorsal view; (329) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia carinifer, holotype ♀ – (330) habitus dorsal view; (331) habitus lateral view.

Figs 348–351. Galeopsomyia coriolis, holotype ♀ – (348) habitus dorsal view; (349) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia cortina, holotype ♀ – (350) habitus dorsal view; (351) habitus lateral view.

Figs 400–403. Galeopsomyia gigantensis, holotype ♀ – (400) habitus dorsal view; (401) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia giria, holotype ♀ – (402) habitus dorsal view; (403) habitus lateral view.

Figs 396–399. Galeopsomyia folata, holotype ♀ – (396) habitus dorsal view; (397) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia gavia, holotype ♀ – (398) habitus dorsal view; (399) habitus lateral view.

Figs 799–807. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (799) Galeopsomyia gutierrezi; (800) G. grandis; (801) G. illydris; (802) G. hiata; (803) G. infusca; (804) G. intesa; (805) G. ira; (806) G. isola; (807) G. lapsa.

Figs 368–371. Galeopsomyia diriaensis, holotype ♀ – (368) habitus dorsal view; (369) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia dolosa, holotype ♀ – (370) habitus dorsal view; (371) habitus lateral view.

Figs 464–467. Galeopsomyia liria, holotype ♀ – (464) habitus dorsal view; (465) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia longicauda, holotype ♀ – (466) habitus dorsal view; (467) habitus lateral view.

Figs 524–527. Galeopsomyia myrsineae, holotype ♀ – (524) habitus dorsal view; (525) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia nana, holotype ♀ – (526) habitus dorsal view; (527) habitus lateral view.

Figs 907–914. Mesoscutellum dorsal view, holotype ♀ – (907) Galeopsomyia casacocaensis; (908) G. alas; (909) G. mynta; (910) G. corista; (911) G. ladrona; (912) G. methea; (913) G. amphis; (914) G. baldosa.

Figs 384–387. Galeopsomyia eximia, holotype ♀ – (384) habitus dorsal view; (385) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia faina, holotype ♀ – (386) habitus dorsal view; (387) habitus lateral view.

Figs 424–427. Galeopsomyia illydris, holotype ♀ – (424) habitus dorsal view; (425) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia infusca, holotype ♀ – (426) habitus dorsal view; (427) habitus lateral view.

Figs 536–539. Galeopsomyia nicoyae, holotype ♀ – (536) habitus dorsal view; (537) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia nigricans, holotype ♀ – (538) habitus dorsal view; (539) habitus lateral view.

Figs 264–267. Galeopsomyia alloris, holotype ♀ – (264) habitus dorsal view; (265) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia altura, holotype ♀ – (266) habitus dorsal view; (267) habitus lateral view.

Figs 624–627. Galeopsomyia wilsoni, holotype ♀ – (624) habitus dorsal view; (625) habi- tus lateral view. Galeopsomyia zurquiensis, holotype ♀ – (626) habitus dorsal view; (627) habitus lateral view.

Figs 344–347. Galeopsomyia codata, holotype ♀ – (344) habitus dorsal view; (345) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia copala, holotype ♀ – (346) habitus dorsal view; (347) habitus lateral view.

Figs 380–383. Galeopsomyia estrella, holotype ♀ – (380) habitus dorsal view; (381) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia evgenyzakharovi, holotype ♀ – (382) habitus dorsal view; (383) habitus lateral view.

Figs 548–551. Galeopsomyia ocoteae, holotype ♀ – (548) habitus dorsal view; (549) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia octava, holotype ♀ – (550) habitus dorsal view; (551) habitus lateral view.

Figs 776–783. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (776) Galeopsomyia coccolobae; (777) G. edera; (778) G. estrella; (779) G. daleskeyae; (780) G. devania; (781) G. diriaensis; (782) G. dolosa; (783) G. eolio.

Figs 440–443. Galeopsomyia juni, holotype ♀ – (440) habitus dorsal view; (441) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia kateperezae, holotype ♀ – (442) habitus dorsal view; (443) habitus lateral view.

Figs 336–339. Galeopsomyia chrysops, holotype ♀ – (336) habitus dorsal view; (337) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia clavata, holotype ♀ – (338) habitus dorsal view; (339) habitus lateral view.

Figs 460–463. Galeopsomyia leonae, holotype ♀ – (460) habitus dorsal view; (461) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia limonensis, holotype ♀ – (462) habitus dorsal view; (463) habitus lateral view.

Figs 288–291. Galeopsomyia assai, holotype ♀ – (288) habitus dorsal view; (289) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia atrata, holotype ♀ – (290) habitus dorsal view; (291) habitus lateral view.

Figs 272–275. Galeopsomyia amyra, holotype ♀ – (272) habitus dorsal view; (273) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia anis, holotype ♀ – (274) habitus dorsal view; (275) habitus lateral view.

Figs 444–447. Galeopsomyia labrada, holotype ♀ – (444) habitus dorsal view; (445) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lacinia, holotype ♀ – (446) habitus dorsal view; (447) habitus lateral view.

Figs 620–623. Galeopsomyia weinmanniae, holotype ♀ – (620) habitus dorsal view; (621) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia wilsonae, holotype ♀ – (622) habitus dorsal view; (623) habitus lateral view.

Figs 296–299. Galeopsomyia baldosa, holotype ♀ – (296) habitus dorsal view; (297) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia bariolis, holotype ♀ – (298) habitus dorsal view; (299) habitus lateral view.

Figs 552–555. Galeopsomyia opala, holotype ♀ – (552) habitus dorsal view; (553) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia opima, holotype ♀ – (554) habitus dorsal view; (555) habitus lateral view.

Figs 280–283. Galeopsomyia arada, holotype ♀ – (280) habitus dorsal view; (281) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia aramis, holotype ♀ – (282) habitus dorsal view; (283) habitus lateral view.

Figs 416–419. Galeopsomyia gutierrezi, holotype ♀ – (416) habitus dorsal view; (417) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia hesperis, holotype ♀ – (418) habitus dorsal view; (419) habitus lateral view.

Figs 316–319. Galeopsomyia bricenoi, holotype ♀ – (316) habitus dorsal view; (317) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia brinaris, holotype ♀ – (318) habitus dorsal view; (319) habitus lateral view.

Figs 256–259. Galeopsomyia alanis, holotype ♀ – (256) habitus dorsal view; (257) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia alegra, holotype ♀ – (258) habitus dorsal view; (259) habitus lateral view.

Figs 600–603. Galeopsomyia scarpia, holotype ♀ – (600) habitus dorsal view; (601) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia schefflerae, holotype ♀ – (602) habitus dorsal view; (603) habitus lateral view.

Figs 496–499. Galeopsomyia meleadis, holotype ♀ – (496) habitus dorsal view; (497) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia menoris, holotype ♀ – (498) habitus dorsal view; (499) habitus lateral view.

Figs 436–439. Galeopsomyia isola, holotype ♀ – (436) habitus dorsal view; (437) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia jaymesonesae, holotype ♀ – (438) habitus dorsal view; (439) habitus lateral view.

Figs 564–567. Galeopsomyia pagana, holotype ♀ – (564) habitus dorsal view; (565) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia palenta, holotype ♀ – (566) habitus dorsal view; (567) habitus lateral view.

Figs 432–435. Galeopsomyia intruita, holotype ♀ – (432) habitus dorsal view; (433) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia ira, holotype ♀ – (434) habitus dorsal view; (435) habitus lateral view.

Figs 516–519. Galeopsomyia mora, holotype ♀ – (516) habitus dorsal view; (517) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia moradis, holotype ♀ – (518) habitus dorsal view; (519) habitus lateral view.

Figs 364–367. Galeopsomyia daleskeyae, holotype ♀ – (364) habitus dorsal view; (365) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia devania, holotype ♀ – (366) habitus dorsal view; (367) habitus lateral view.

Figs 834–840. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (834) Galeopsomyia melasoma; (835) G. mora; (836) G. nana; (837) G. marbis; (838) G. methea; (839) G. milagra; (840) G. miliaris.

Figs 504–507. Galeopsomyia miga, holotype ♀ – (504) habitus dorsal view; (505) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia milagra, holotype ♀ – (506) habitus dorsal view; (507) habitus lateral view.

Figs 292–295. Galeopsomyia aureoviridis, holotype ♀ – (292) habitus dorsal view; (293) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia avis, holotype ♀ – (294) habitus dorsal view; (295) habitus lateral view.

Figs 452–455. Galeopsomyia latosa, holotype ♀ – (452) habitus dorsal view; (453) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lealis, holotype ♀ – (454) habitus dorsal view; (455) habitus lateral view.

Figs 584–587. Galeopsomyia picuda, holotype ♀ – (584) habitus dorsal view; (585) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia pilonensis, holotype ♀ – (586) habitus dorsal view; (587) habitus lateral view.

Figs 879–884. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (879) Galeopsomyia capillosa; (880) G. curiosa; (881) G. wilsoni; (882) G. gobis; (883) G. hirsuta; (884) G. scabiosa.

Figs 856–863. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (856) Galeopsomyia nigricans; (857) G. orillia; (858) G. palenta; (859) G. pagana; (860) G. pardis; (861) G. pava; (862) G. pensada; (863) G. preta.

Figs 791–798. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (791) Galeopsomyia fieris; (792) G. giria; (793) G. gonzalezi; (794) G. gavia; (795) G. flora; (796) G. gridis; (797) G. graciliclava; (798) G. hesperis.

Figs 484–487. Galeopsomyia manotris, holotype ♀ – (484) habitus dorsal view; (485) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia marbis, holotype ♀ – (486) habitus dorsal view; (487) habitus lateral view.

Figs 312–315. Galeopsomyia bravis, holotype ♀ – (312) habitus dorsal view; (313) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia briannestjacquesae, holotype ♀ – (314) habitus dorsal view; (315) habitus lateral view.

Figs 512–515. Galeopsomyia moleris, holotype ♀ – (512) habitus dorsal view; (513) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia montanis, holotype ♀ – (514) habitus dorsal view; (515) habitus lateral view.

Figs 768–775. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (768) Galeopsomyia clavata; (769) G. codata; (770) G. copala; (771) G. cortina; (772) G. crabra; (773) G. cosidis; (774) G. criniera; (775) G. cyaneoviridis.

Figs 352–355. Galeopsomyia cosidis, holotype ♀ – (352) habitus dorsal view; (353) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia crabra, holotype ♀ – (354) habitus dorsal view; (355) habitus lateral view.

Figs 320–323. Galeopsomyia burra, holotype ♀ – (320) habitus dorsal view; (321) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia burreadis, holotype ♀ – (322) habitus dorsal view; (323) habitus lateral view.

Figs 520–523. Galeopsomyia munda, holotype ♀ – (520) habitus dorsal view; (521) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia myrciae, holotype ♀ – (522) habitus dorsal view; (523) habitus lateral view.

Figs 268–271. Galeopsomyia ambigua, holotype ♀ – (268) habitus dorsal view; (269) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia amphis, holotype ♀ – (270) habitus dorsal view; (271) habitus lateral view.

Figs 841–849. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (841) Galeopsomyia miria; (842) G. montanis; (843) G. moradis; (844) G. myrciae; (845) G. navia; (846) G. neotropicalis; (847) G. nicoyae; (848) G. nitida; (849) G. octava.

Figs 488–491. Galeopsomyia matearis, holotype ♀ – (488) habitus dorsal view; (489) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia maya, holotype ♀ – (490) habitus dorsal view; (491) habitus lateral view.

Figs 576–579. Galeopsomyia pensada, holotype ♀ – (576) habitus dorsal view; (577) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia perasphondyliae, holotype ♀ – (578) habitus dorsal view; (579) habitus lateral view.

Figs 480–483. Galeopsomyia malandrina, holotype ♀ – (480) habitus dorsal view; (481) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia manga, holotype ♀ – (482) habitus dorsal view; (483) habitus lateral view.

Figs 500–503. Galeopsomyia mesana, holotype ♀ – (500) habitus dorsal view; (501) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia methea, holotype ♀ – (502) habitus dorsal view; (503) habitus lateral view.

Figs 468–471. Galeopsomyia lumbrada, holotype ♀ – (468) habitus dorsal view; (469) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia lunaniae, holotype ♀ – (470) habitus dorsal view; (471) habitus lateral view.

Figs 392–395. Galeopsomyia fieris, holotype ♀ – (392) habitus dorsal view; (393) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia flora, holotype ♀ – (394) habitus dorsal view; (395) habitus lateral view.

Figs 648–651. Galeopsomyia epidius (Walker), non-type ♀ – (648) habitus dorsal view; (649) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia multisulcata (Girault), non-type ♀ – (650) habitus dorsal view; (651) habitus lateral view.

Figs 492–495. Galeopsomyia medrosa, holotype ♀ – (492) habitus dorsal view; (493) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia melasoma, holotype ♀ – (494) habitus dorsal view; (495) habitus lateral view.

Figs 751–759. Head incl. antennae, lateral view ♀ – (751) Galeopsomyia atrata; (752) G. baldosa; (753) G. bicolor; (754) G. bestis; (755) G. boria; (756) G. bravis; (757) G. bricenoi; (758) G. burreadis; (759) G. carbonis.

Figs 252–255. Galeopsomyia ajax, holotype ♀ – (252) habitus dorsal view; (253) habitus lateral view. Galeopsomyia alambra, holotype ♀ – (254) habitus dorsal view; (255) habitus lateral view.