Discoglossus, OTTH, 1837

Rage, Jean-Claude, 2016, Frogs (Amphibia, Anura) From The Eocene And Oligocene Of The Phosphorites Du Quercy (France). An Overview, Fossil Imprint 72 (1 - 2), pp. 53-66 : 54-55

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.14446/FI.2016.53

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4586384

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039987DF-FFE9-C757-7D23-C6FBFC03F872

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Discoglossus
status

 

Discoglossus View in CoL group

( Text-fig. 2 View Text-fig : 1– 6)

The Alytidae View in CoL are currently present in Europe, northwesternmost Africa and the western Middle East. They include three living genera, Alytes WAGLER, 1830 View in CoL , Discoglossus OTTH, 1837 View in CoL and Latonia VON MEYER, 1843 View in CoL ( Biton et al. 2013). These frogs, with two other living genera ( Bombina OKEN, 1816 View in CoL and Barbourula TAYLOR et NOBLE, 1924 View in CoL ) have been traditionally referred to as Discoglossidae GÜNTHER, 1858 View in CoL . However, Frost et al. (2006) split the Discoglossidae View in CoL into two families, the Alytidae View in CoL and the Bombinatoridae GRAY, 1825 View in CoL . The name Discoglossidae View in CoL disappeared and, in Frost et al.’s classification, its equivalent is Costata LATASTE, 1879. However, the name Discoglossidae View in CoL is still widely used, mainly in paleontology (e.g., Roček et al. 2010, Szentesi and Venczel 2012, Gardner and DeMar 2013, Venczel and Hír 2013).

The Alytidae View in CoL first occur in the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of England ( Evans et al. 1990). They range among the earliest known anurans (Triassic forms being salientians, not anurans) and, from the Middle Jurassic onwards, they have been present in Europe. Most fossils belong to the ‘ Discoglossus View in CoL group’, more specifically they are related to the Discoglossus View in CoL - Latonia View in CoL assemblage ( Roček 1994).

In the Phosphorites, Alytidae View in CoL are rare, especially in the Eocene. In his unpublished thesis, Duffaud (2000) reported a possible scapula from Sainte-Néboule (MP 18), but the specimen was neither described nor figured and now is missing from the collections. For the time being, a single fragment of urostyle from Rosières 1 (MP 19) demonstrates that alytids were present in the Phosphorites before the Oligocene ( Text-fig. 2 View Text-fig : 1). However, outside of the Phosphorites, alytids were more frequent, although never numerous, in the European Eocene ( Rage and Ford 1980, Milner 1986).

In the Oligocene, alytids occur from MP 21 to MP 25 and in MP 28. Alytids from the Oligocene were all referred to as Discoglossus cf. giganteus by de Bonis et al. (1973: table 2–5). D. giganteus WETTSTEIN- WESTERHEIMB, 1955 is now included in the genus Latonia , as L. gigantea ( Roček 1994, Rage and Hossini 2000). Before Roček’s revision of Latonia ( Roček 1994) , various alytids from the Cainozoic were erroneously assigned to D. giganteus . However, there is likely more than one alytid taxon in the Oligocene of the Phosphorites. The few alytids from the early Oligocene (MP 21 and MP 22) appear to be about twice the size of the younger specimens ( Text-fig. 2 View Text-fig : 2, 3) and, based on urostyles, their size is similar to that of the only specimen known from the Eocene. This difference in size may correspond to a taxonomic distinction, but this cannot be demonstrated on the basis of the available material. In addition, in MP 23, large and smaller alytids coexisted. Duffaud (2000) suggested that Latonia vertaizoni FRIANT, 1944 might be present in the Oligocene of the Phosphorites. The latter taxon is known by a single specimen from Vertaizon, a locality relatively close to the Quercy and whose age is regarded as late Oligocene, although an early Miocene age cannot be rejected ( Gaudant 1993). Unfortunately, comparisons are almost impossible because the holotype of L. vertaizoni is an articulated skeleton whose bones are poorly preserved ( Roček 1994: fig. 19).

The Alytidae from the Phosphorites cannot be identified to genus level. However, various features observable on the available bones demonstrate that these alytids belong to the ‘ Discoglossus group’ (presence of a dorsal crest on the ilium, tuber superius formed by a thickening of the posterior part of the latter crest, vertebral centrum cylindrical, neural spine projecting posteriorly beyond the level of the postzygapophyses, distal part of the humerus relatively expanded transversely; Text-fig. 2 View Text-fig : 4–6).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Anura

Family

Alytidae

Loc

Discoglossus

Rage, Jean-Claude 2016
2016
Loc

Barbourula

TAYLOR et NOBLE 1924
1924
Loc

Discoglossidae GÜNTHER, 1858

GUNTHER 1858
1858
Loc

Discoglossidae

GUNTHER 1858
1858
Loc

Discoglossidae

GUNTHER 1858
1858
Loc

Discoglossidae

GUNTHER 1858
1858
Loc

Alytidae

FITZINGER 1843
1843
Loc

Latonia

VON MEYER 1843
1843
Loc

Alytidae

FITZINGER 1843
1843
Loc

Alytidae

FITZINGER 1843
1843
Loc

Latonia

VON MEYER 1843
1843
Loc

Alytidae

FITZINGER 1843
1843
Loc

Discoglossus

OTTH 1837
1837
Loc

Discoglossus

OTTH 1837
1837
Loc

Discoglossus

OTTH 1837
1837
Loc

Alytes

WAGLER 1830
1830
Loc

Bombinatoridae

GRAY 1825
1825
Loc

Bombina

OKEN 1816
1816
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF