PHORINAE (Brown, 1994)

Brown, Brian V., Amorim, Dalton De Souza & Kung, Giar-Ann, 2015, New morphological characters for classifying Phoridae (Diptera) from the structure of the thorax, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 173 (2), pp. 424-485 : 467-474

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12208

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039987A3-BD6B-2953-655A-FA652F918F62

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

PHORINAE
status

 

SUBGROUPINGS WITHIN PHORINAE View in CoL

35. Hind coxa: (0) evenly, densely microtrichose, as on meron, (1) microtrichia mostly absent, replaced by fine transverse sculpturing ( Fig. 15A–F View Figure 15 ).

In outgroups ( Figs 2–3, 15A View Figure 15 ), Sciadocerinae ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 15B View Figure 15 ) and Chonocephalinae ( Figs 5 View Figure 5 , 15C View Figure 15 ), the dense microtrichia found on the meron are carried over onto the hind coxa. In most other phorids, including the Termitoxeniinae genera ( Fig. 15D View Figure 15 ), these microtrichia are less dense to completely absent ( Fig. 15E, F View Figure 15 ). Exceptions we examined are the phorines Conicera , Contopteryx , Darwiniphora (all of which are conicerines), Tonnoirina , Wharia and the metopinine Corynusa , all of which have dense microtrichia. Many phorines have transverse sculpturing on the hind coxa that sometimes appears like microtrichia. This feature is clear in the hypocerines, but somewhat difficult to score in some intermediary taxa.

36. Hind coxa: (0) lacking anterior carina, with rounded fold only, (1) with narrow anterior carina ( Fig. 37A–F View Figure 37 ).

The hind coxa in platypezids is cylindrical, plesiomorphic in its shape ( Fig. 37A View Figure 37 ). The membranous part of the coxa posteriorly, the lumen, is long, facing posteriorly. Sciadocerines have the distal end of the coxa more slender ( Fig. 37B View Figure 37 ), in some extension similar to Chonocephalus or to Javanoxenia ( Fig. 37C View Figure 37 ). In some phorine genera ( Fig. 37D View Figure 37 ), there is a carina, but it is not sharp or complete as in some other genera. The derived character state ( Fig. 37E, F View Figure 37 ) apparently is convergent in higher metopinines and some phorines. Indeed, there are many more characters available in the modification of the hind coxa shape, but they are more subtle and are monophyletic for the main clades found here.

37. Halter: (0) elongate, large, (1) relatively small ( Fig. 26A–F View Figure 26 ).

In outgroups ( Fig. 26A View Figure 26 ), Sciadocerinae ( Fig. 26B View Figure 26 ), Chonocephalinae ( Fig. 26C View Figure 26 ), Termitoxeniinae ( Fig. 26D View Figure 26 ), basal metopinines and basal phorines, the halter is elongate and relatively large compared with the body size. In a group of genera the halter has become relatively small ( Fig. 26E, F View Figure 26 ). This character is best defined in the most derived groups, such as hypocerines, and is somewhat intermediate in more basal groups (especially Beckerina ).

38. Limit between meron and anepimeron: (0) marked by suture (posterior arm of ‘W’), (1) without suture ( Fig. 38A–F View Figure 38 ).

The limit of the suture between the meron (usually interpreted as the katepimeron) and the anepimeron is clear in Platypezidae , a condition preserved in the Sciadocerinae ( Fig. 38A View Figure 38 ) and Chonocephalinae genera ( Fig. 38B View Figure 38 ), despite the changes that already began to affect the anepimeron at this level of the evolution of the thorax in phorids. In some metopinines, such as in Ctenopleuriphora ( Fig. 38C View Figure 38 ), the suture is present, but not strongly marked, while in other genera, such as Gymnophora or Beckerina ( Fig. 38D View Figure 38 ), at least the ventral part of the suture is missing. In some phorine genera the suture is especially evident, as in Coniceromyia ( Fig. 38E View Figure 38 ) or Phora , but a clade with the hypocerines and diplonevrines do not show a suture ( Fig. 38F View Figure 38 ).

39. Surface of meron dorsally (and perhaps part of the anepimeron): (0) slightly convex or relatively flat, (1) deeply concave ( Fig. 39A–F View Figure 39 ).

This is an interesting and useful uniquely derived character of a small group of phorines. In sciadocerines ( Fig. 39A View Figure 39 ), Chonocephalus ( Fig. 39B View Figure 39 ), termitoxeniines, most metopinines ( Fig. 39C View Figure 39 ) and some phorine genera ( Fig. 39D View Figure 39 ), the meron (and the fused katepimeron) is a relatively flat sclerite dorsally. In a group of phorines, there is a conspicuous concavity on the dorsal part of the meron ( Fig. 39E, F View Figure 39 ). This feature defines a fairly large clade with the subfamily, including hypocerines and thaumatoxenines, but not genera such as Diplonevra , Conicera , Tonnoirina , Ceratusa , Minicosta and Chaetocnemistoptera . Because there is little indication of homoplastic origin of this feature (except in the unrelated Ctenopleuriphora ) or secondary loss, this feature becomes extremely helpful to include or exclude genera from this clade.

40. Posterior arm of anepimeron: (0) wide, (1) slender, compressed ( Fig. 40A–F View Figure 40 ).

There is a long sequence of changes in the shape of the anepimeron within the evolution of the Phoridae , generating a complex multi-state character. There is phylogenetic signal even for small details on the shape of parts of the anepimeron, but for the time being we limited the number of characters used. In the phorid groundplan, as can be seen in Sciadocera ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ), the posterodorsal projection of the katepisternum into the anepimeron is nearly non-existent. In Chonocephalus ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ), termitoxeniines ( Figs 6 View Figure 6 , 40A View Figure 40 ) and some metopinine genera ( Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 40C View Figure 40 ), the posterior arm of the ‘W’ is relatively small, but not compressed, as seen in hypocerine genera of Phorinae ( Figs 8, 40F View Figure 40 ). In some other phorine genera, such as Phora , Conicera , Coniceromyia , Burmophora and Ceratoplatus , the posterior arm of the anepimeron is notably wide and with a typical plesiomorphic shape ( Fig. 40D, E View Figure 40 ). The compression of the posterior arm ( Fig. 40F View Figure 40 ) is correlated with a concave meron and perhaps should not be considered an independent character.

41. Ventral half of meron: (0) microtrichose, like upper half, (1) with microtrichia reduced or absent ( Fig. 41A–F View Figure 41 ).

This character is not clear-cut in some genera. The condition in Sciadocera , Chonocephalus ( Fig. 41A View Figure 41 ), termitoxeniines ( Fig. 41B View Figure 41 ) and most metopinines ( Fig. 41C View Figure 41 ) is as in outgroups. A microtrichose meron within the phorines is found in Phora and other nonhypocerine genera. Microtrichia are absent anteroventrally on the meron of Dohrniphora ( Fig. 41D View Figure 41 ), but are present elsewhere on the structure. Further exceptions are Hypocera ( Fig. 41E View Figure 41 ) and Trineurocephala , both of which have some microtrichia on the meron.

42. Dense setulae of scutum: (0) restricted to dorsum, (1) extending into lateral surface of thorax, especially over the anepisternum ( Fig. 42A–F View Figure 42 ).

The extension of the typical scutal setation onto the anepisternum is a condition found in hypocerines, Dohrniphora , possibly Diplonevra , Abaristophora ( Fig. 42E View Figure 42 ), Neopleurophora , Aenigmatias , Chaetopleurophora , Epicnemis , Thaumatoxena , Palpiclavina , Epicnemis ( Fig. 42F View Figure 42 ), Aenigmatistes and others. This character state refers to, in large part, the long used ‘anepisternum setulose’ (or ‘mesopleuron hairy’) character in phorid taxonomy. It is in some degree (but not strictly) coordinated with the shortened lateral parapsidal suture. The fact that in hypocerine genera the setation extends from the dorsoanterior end of the anepisternum makes it obvious that it is not homologous to the presence of setation at the posterior end of the sclerite seen, for example, in Chonocephalus ( Fig. 42A View Figure 42 ) or Termitophilomyia ( Fig. 42B View Figure 42 ). The plesiomorphic condition is seen in platypezids ( Fig. 2), lonchopterids ( Fig. 3) and sciadocerines ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ), with no setation at all on the anepisternum. On the other hand, Coniceromyia , Rhynchomicropteron and Chaetopleurophora , which are obviously plesiomorphic for almost the entire set of apomorphic characters that define the hypocerines, show similar setation, but were treated as cases of parallel development. Their setae are not continuous with those of the scutum, as is the case with hypoocerines, and were thus not coded as having this character present in our analysis. Aenigmatias , as well, has setation over the anepisternum, but other characters do not place the genus in the hypocerine clade.

43. Anterior spiracle position: (0) below level of dorsal margin of anepisternum, (1) above level of dorsal margin of anepisternum ( Fig. 43A–F View Figure 43 ).

This is a character traditionally used to define the Aenigmatiinae . The more plesiomorphic condition has the spiracle in a much more ventral level with the parapsidal suture, as seen in Chonocephalus ( Fig. 43A View Figure 43 ). Most metopinine and phorine genera have the spiracle displaced in different degrees to a more dorsal position ( Fig. 43B–D View Figure 43 ), but we did not convert that variation into additional character states. In Thaumatoxena ( Fig. 43E View Figure 43 ), Epicnemis , Misotermes ( Fig. 43F View Figure 43 ), Stichillus , Aenigmatistes and some other genera, the middle of the anterior spiracle is even more dorsal than the dorsal margin of the anepisternum or the parapsidal suture. The change is correlated with the acquisition of the limuloid shape, which occurred more than once in the evolution of the phorids. This apomorphic condition is absent in Hypocera , Latiborophaga , Neopleurophora and other hypocerine genera.

44. Strong postpronotal seta: (0) present, (1) reduced, (2) absent ( Fig. 44A–F View Figure 44 ).

There is a pair of long postpronotal setae in platypezids we examined ( Fig. 44A View Figure 44 ), whereas Lonchoptera has a single one ( Fig. 44B View Figure 44 ). Within phorids, Sciadocera ( Fig. 44C View Figure 44 ) has one long postpronotal seta, while in Chonocephalus the single seta is relatively delicate ( Fig. 44D View Figure 44 ). Termitoxeniines have no distinctive stronger seta on the postpronotum ( Fig. 44E View Figure 44 ), which is apomorphic. In the remaining phorids, there is usually a strong postpronotal seta, in addition to a number of smaller ones covering the sclerite (which is now fused to the scutum and the anepisternum). This condition is seen, for example, in metopinines, Phora , Coniceromyia , Burmophora etc., whereas Epicnemis , Hypocera , Stichillus , Chaetocnemistoptera , Neopleurophora , Gymnophora , Trineurocephala , Latiborophaga ( Fig. 44F View Figure 44 ) and other genera have only small setae on the postpronotum.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Phoridae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF