Hister foveipygus Wenzel & Dybas
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.158689 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B6919EC-1A08-44B5-8ED2-DC032EE6BF58 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6271832 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0399879A-FF93-FFD0-FE98-FA07FE6F07E7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hister foveipygus Wenzel & Dybas |
status |
|
Hister foveipygus Wenzel & Dybas View in CoL ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 4 View FIGURE 4 E, 5D, 6C–D, 7B, 8B)
Hister foveipygus Wenzel & Dybas, 1941: 456 View in CoL ; holotype probably male (disarticulated and missing genitalia): “Barro Clrdo Is. PANAMA, C.Z., VII:20:38 652”/ “Coll. by E.C. Williams”/ “Collection R. L. Wenzel”, [FMNH]; examined 1997.
Diagnosis: Hister foveipygus is generally similar to the preceding species, and is only described here to the extent that they differ: Average length: 3.3 mm (range 3.1–3.6); Avg. width: 3.2 mm (range 3.1–3.4); body smaller, more distinctly flattened, with the outline slightly but distinctly interrupted at the pronotal/elytral junction ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 B); mandibles short, convex (rather than flattened) anteriorly; pronotal margin slightly more conspicuously convex; protibia narrower, with its apical tooth less prominent, its apical margin oblique ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 D); elytral stria 3 more nearly and frequently complete (though still interrupted behind the middle in many individuals); striae 4 and 5 represented by deeply impressed apical fragments; propygidium with well defined, shallowly depressed, densely punctate area occupying most of its apical twothirds, though with elevated impunctate margins on either side; pygidium similarly densely punctate in most of basal twothirds, impunctate apically ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E); all ventral tarsal setae fine, characteristically recurved back toward tarsus; male with tegmen of aedeagus smaller and more nearly parallel sided than above, its apical emargination very narrow, acute ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 C); internal structure of median lobe and associated armature ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 D) without obvious differences from that of H. guanacaste ; female with valvifer of ovipositor relatively shorter than above, equal in length to coxite ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 B); six spermathecae present, four approximately equal in length to bursa, two about half as long. (Possible variation in number and degree of development of spermathecae has not been investigated. It seems unlikely that this difference from H. guanacaste will be consistent.)
Records ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ): COSTA RICA (all INBI, except as noted): Limon, Amubri, A. C. Amistad, 20 m, March; Puntarenas, Res. Biol. Carara, Laguna Meandrica, 100m, June; Puntarenas, Res. Biol. Carara, Est. Quebrada Bonita, 50m, May, June, July, August, September; Puntarenas, Parque Nacional Corcovado, Est. Sirena, 100m, May, June, August (INBI, SEMC); Puntarenas, Peninsula de Osa, Rancho Quemado, May, June, July; Puntarenas, Res. Biol. Carara, Est. Quebrada Bonita, 50m, May, June, July, Aug., Sept., Oct.; Puntarenas, Parque Nacional Corcovado, Est. Sirena, 100m, May, June; Puntarenas, Parque Nacional Manuel Antonio, 80m, May; July. PANAMA (all SEMC): Barro Colorado Island, Aug.; Colon, P. N. Soberania, June; Colon, 15 km N. Jct. Escobal & Pina Rds., 30m, June.
Remarks: The type specimen was collected from ‘leaf mold’. Unfortunately no subsequently collected specimens have any ecological data. Most other specimens have been collected using flight interception traps. Aside from the unique type, from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, most available specimens are from Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica. Some differences between the original description and that given above are due to the type being a badly worn individual (e.g., its lack of protibial dentation and ‘blunt mandibles’; Wenzel & Dybas, 1941). Others, however, such as the type’s complete lack of 4th and 5th dorsal striae, and its possession of abbreviated prosternal striae, seem to be geographically consistent. More material from the intervening areas is needed to assess the significance of these differences.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hister foveipygus Wenzel & Dybas
Caterino, Michael S. 2004 |
Hister foveipygus
Wenzel 1941: 456 |