Meiacanthus (Meiacanthus) vicinus Smith-Vaniz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.278871 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6187258 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0397878C-1852-E649-0C94-2CEDFDDBFEFD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meiacanthus (Meiacanthus) vicinus Smith-Vaniz |
status |
|
Meiacanthus (Meiacanthus) vicinus Smith-Vaniz View in CoL
The original description of this species ( Smith-Vaniz 1987) was based only on the 41.3 mm SL male holotype from Barang Lompo, Sulawesi. Color photographs, one shown here ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ), and collection of a female specimen allows a slightly expanded description: WAM P.31500-001 (35.0 mm SL), Banggai Islands, Kembongan I., 1°53'S, 123°41'E, 14–15 m).
Data for the male holotype, if different, are given first with those of the female in parentheses. Dorsal fin IV, 26 (IV, 25); anal fin II, 15 (II, 14); pectoral fin 14-14 (13-13); Vertebrae 13+21 (14+20); incisor teeth in lower jaw 23 (20); in upper jaw 22 (20). Pelvic fin 23.7 (13.5)% SL; caudal-fin rays: outer 34.2 (29.0)% SL and inner 23.9 (22.9)% SL. These data indicate that the length of the pelvic fin is sexually dimorphic but the caudal fin probably is not. As discussed above under comparisons, M. abruptus and this species have very similar color patterns, differing primarily in details of the mid-lateral stripe termination. The dark stripe along the dorsal body contour is highly variable in width in M. vicinus such that the pale area of the body between it and the mid-lateral stripe is very narrow in some individuals ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |