Dima dalmatina Küster, 1844
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4220.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D74BC90C-84CC-4788-9048-54F5C8521B32 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4670819 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B0-FFAE-FFFA-C8C6-FCC03972AC59 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Dima dalmatina Küster, 1844 |
status |
|
Figs 14–19 View FIGURES 1 – 14 View FIGURES 15 – 29 , 122 View FIGURES 119 – 130 , 179–180 View FIGURES 172 – 181 , 243 View FIGURE 243 .
Dima dalmatina Küster, 1844: 13 ; Schwarz 1906: 247; Petri 1912: 196; Schenkling 1927: 419; Depoli 1928: 223; Fleutiaux 1943: 40; Novak 1952: 135; Cobos 1961: 109; Novak 1970: 21; Dajoz 1973: 105; Schimmel 1987: 42; Platia 1994: 121; Schimmel 1996: 138; Mertlik & Dusanek 2006: 151; Cate 2007: 183; Schimmel & Platia 2008: 566.
Type depository. Syntype, male (BMNH). Other type material unknown.
Type locality. Croatia: Omiš [Dalmatien: Almissa].
New material. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: Prenj planina, no date, 1 ex. [without head] ( PCGP) ; CROATIA: Zaostorog, Rilič [vápencové škrapy Riliče], 20. III.2000, 1 ♂, on the ground between stones [skalní lesostep, na zemi mezi kameny], R. Gabzdil leg. ( PCRG) ; Zaostorog , 22.– 24. III.2001, 1 ♀, P. Arpáš leg. ( PCJM); MONTENEGRO : Jugoslavia, Petrovac, 16. VI.1974, 1 ♀, J. Hladil leg. ( PCRS) ; Bar distr., Mt .. Vrsouta , Sutorman , mixed forest (42°9'18.32"N, 19°5'52.81"E), 1.–2. VI.2014, 2 ♀♀, singled at night, swept and beaten, V. Dušánek leg. ( PCVD) GoogleMaps ; dtto, 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, T. Németh leg. (PCRK), dtto, 2 ♀♀, Kundrata lgt. (PCRK); Dalmatien, Budva, coll. Reitter, 1 ♀ (HNHM); Dalmatia, coll. E. Frivaldszky, 1 ♂ (HNHM); Dalmatia, coll. Lichtn., 1 ♀ (HNHM).
Diagnosis. Dima dalmatina is a medium-sized species (body length: 11.5–13.5 mm) easily recognizable by its elongate body, relatively long antennae (surpassing hind angles by about 3.5 segments in males), shiny pronotum with sides with the short semi-erect setae along the whole length, elytra with short dense decumbent pubescence, and elytral interstices matt, microreticulated ( Figs 14–19 View FIGURES 1 – 14 View FIGURES 15 – 29 , 122 View FIGURES 119 – 130 ). This species is very like D. marvani Mertlik & Dusanek, 2006 ( Figs 62–65 View FIGURES 60 – 74 ). The typical representatives of D. dalmatina differ from the typical D. marvani by more distinctly defined keel between frons and clypeus, shorter antennae in males (about 55% of body length in D. dalmatina , more than 60 % in D. marvani ), wider pronotum (1.4 times wider than long in D. dalmatina , 1.3 times wider than long in D. marvani ), pronotal pubescence denser, near sides directed towards posterior angles ( Figs 122 View FIGURES 119 – 130 , 144 View FIGURES 143 – 154 ), and apical lobe of paramera shorter ( Figs 180 View FIGURES 172 – 181 , 198 View FIGURES 192 – 201 ).
Intraspecific variability. There are two distinct Dima populations in Rumija Mts. in Montenegro; one resembles more D. dalmatina and the second is more like D. marvani . However, they both differ from the typical representatives of respective species ( Figs 18–19 View FIGURES 15 – 29 , 64–65 View FIGURES 60 – 74 ). Both of these local forms have a darker body and slightly more convex and longer pronotum than most of the typical specimens. The specimens similar in most aspects to D. dalmatina have longer apical lobes of paramera like those found in D. marvani ( Fig. 179 View FIGURES 172 – 181 ). Unfortunatelly, without larger series of both species collected from more localities we are unable to make any taxonomical conclusions and we keep the populations from Rumija Mts. in D. dalmatina and D. marvani .
Distribution. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro ( Fig. 243 View FIGURE 243 ). First record for Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Remarks. The syntype of D. dalmatina deposited in the BMNH, London, is clearly a male, but without genitalia neither inside the abdomen nor glued on a label ( Figs 14–15 View FIGURES 1 – 14 View FIGURES 15 – 29 ); there is a label "Abdomen seems to be empty, R. Schimmel 19 85".
A specimen from Greece (Florina, 1100 m, 11.VII.1981, Osella leg.), which is mentioned under D. dalmatina by Guglielmi & Platia (1985: 194), is probably an erroneously identified specimen. That specimen was identified by Dr. Guglielmi and should be deposited in the Verona museum (G. Platia, pers. comm.), however it is probably misplaced in the collection (R. Salmaso, pers. comm.). It might be conspecific with D. florinensis Platia, 2012 , which occurs in that area ( Platia 2012).
One specimen from Rumija Mts. recorded under D. dalmatina in Schimmel & Platia (2008) was redetermined as D. marvani .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dima dalmatina Küster, 1844
Mertlik, Josef, Németh, Tamás & Kundrata, Robin 2017 |
Dima dalmatina Küster, 1844 : 13
Schimmel 2008: 566 |
Cate 2007: 183 |
Mertlik 2006: 151 |
Schimmel 1996: 138 |
Platia 1994: 121 |
Schimmel 1987: 42 |
Dajoz 1973: 105 |
Novak 1970: 21 |
Cobos 1961: 109 |
Novak 1952: 135 |
Fleutiaux 1943: 40 |
Depoli 1928: 223 |
Schenkling 1927: 419 |
Petri 1912: 196 |
Schwarz 1906: 247 |
Kuster 1844: 13 |