Acantheis dimidiatus ( Thorell, 1890 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5353.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A24DCBF-BC93-4B25-BB8A-DEAE75167DB4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8427172 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0396878D-F556-6C77-3EA3-A793F4FBF9AE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acantheis dimidiatus ( Thorell, 1890 ) |
status |
|
Acantheis dimidiatus ( Thorell, 1890) View in CoL
Figs 36–48 View FIGURES 36–44 View FIGURES 46–48
Acanthoctenus dimidiatus Thorell, 1890: 134 (♁).
Acantheis dimidiatus View in CoL — Simon 1897: 117.
Material examined. 1♁ (holotype) ( MSNG), INDONESIA: Sumatra Island: Singalong, O. Beccari. Examined by photo .
Diagnosis. The species is similar to A. laetus from Kalimantan and to A. sergeimishenini sp. n. and A. andreimishenini sp. n. from Sumatra in having the slender embolus (Em), the medially located tegular apophysis (TA) and the elongated cymbial tip. The male of A. dimidiatus differs from that of A. laetus by by the strongly curved embolus (vs. smoothly rounded, cf. Fig 43 View FIGURES 36–44 and Lehtinen 1967: fig. 410).The male of A. dimidiatus can be distinguished from that of A. sergeimishenini sp. n. by the non-bifurcated retrolateral tibial apophsis (RTA) (vs. bifurcated, cf. Figs 41 View FIGURES 36–44 and 15 View FIGURES 12–21 ), the triangular tegular apophysis (vs. comma-shaped, cf. Figs 43 View FIGURES 36–44 and 23 View FIGURES 22–29 ), and the ventral embolic branch twice thinner than dorsal one (vs. ventral embolic branch twice wider than dorsal one, cf. Figs 41 View FIGURES 36–44 and 30 View FIGURES 30–35 ). From the males of A. andreimishenini sp. n. those of A. dimidiatus differs by the dorsal surface of opisthosoma with a thin stripe reaching spinnerets (vs. wide cardiac mark reaching middle part of opisthosoma, cf. Figs 36 View FIGURES 36–44 and 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ), the median band on the carapace as wide as distance between PME (vs. as wide as the distance between PLE), the triangular tegular apophysis (TA) (vs. circular, cf. Figs 43 View FIGURES 36–44 and 27 View FIGURES 22–29 ), and the ventral embolic branch twice thinner than dorsal one (vs. dorsal and ventral embolic branches equal in size, cf. Figs 41 View FIGURES 36–44 and 31 View FIGURES 30–35 ). For a complete list of the differences between the males of A. dimidiatus , A. sergeimishenini sp. n. and A. andreimeshenini sp. n. see Table 7 View TABLE 7 .
Description. Male palp as shown in Figs 37–43 View FIGURES 36–44 . Tibia ca. 4.6 longer than wide, 4 very long spines, longest ca. 0.7 of tibia length. Retrolateral tibial apophysis small, non-bifurcated. Cymbial tip about 0.42 of its length, slightly shorter than bulb. Sperm duct clearly visible only in retrolateral view. Tegular apophysis triangular. Embolus strongly curved. Ventral branch of embolus twice thinner than dorsal one.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality ( Figs 46–48 View FIGURES 46–48 ).
MSNG |
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 'Giacomo Doria' |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acantheis dimidiatus ( Thorell, 1890 )
Fomichev, Alexander A., Omelko, Mikhail M. & Marusik, Yuri M. 2023 |
Acantheis dimidiatus
Simon, E. 1897: 117 |
Acanthoctenus dimidiatus
Thorell, T. 1890: 134 |