Cylapus Say, 1832
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B3C6765-F0D2-4846-BB95-200258ECC0E1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FB-AE7F-FF95-FF51-175343E9FEA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-12-06 08:45:40, last updated by GgImagineBatch 2021-12-06 08:48:32) |
scientific name |
Cylapus Say, 1832 |
status |
|
Diagnosis. In addition to the characters provided by Wolski (2017), this genus can be easily distinguished from other members of the Cylapus complex by the following features of the female genitalia presented below.
Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal ( Figs 16a, d, g, 17a, j), rarely semicircular (17c, g); sclerotized rings usually unpaired or rarely paired, narrow, embracing anterior and lateral margins of bursa copulatrix ( Figs 16a, d, g, 17a, d, h, k); dorsal sac sclerotized, with a more or less developed, transverse sclerotization connecting posterior portion(s) of sclerotized ring(s) ( Figs 16a, b, d, e, g, h, 17a, f, h, k); ventral labiate plate broad, with stripe-like sclerotization ( Figs 16c, f, i, 17e, i, m); posterior wall of bursa copulatrix membranous ( Fig. 19g).
Remarks. The results of the present phylogenetic analyses fully corroborate my previous observation ( Wolski 2017) that the genus Cylapocerus Carvalho & Fontes should be treated as a synonym of Cylapus . The most distinctive features allowing for distinguishing Cylapus from other members of the Cylapus complex are: the metathoracic ostiolar canal strongly raised above the evaporative areas, the ostiolar peritreme arcuate and sharply pointed ( Fig. 10c), tarsomere I as long as or weakly longer than II and III combined ( Fig. 10i), the endosoma usually with at least four sclerites ( Wolski 2017: figs 66, 71, 80, 85, 97, 102, 110, 135, 140); the bursa copulatrix trapezoidal, rarely semicircular; the sclerotized rings thin, embracing the bursa copulatrix, the posterior edge (sac) of bursa copulatrix strongly sclerotized and with more or less developed transverse sclerite connecting posterior portions of sclerotized rings; vlp with a narrow, stripe-like sclerotization ( Figs 16, 17).
Citation for the genus and treated species were given by Carvalho (1957), Schuh (2002 –2013), Gorczyca (2006a), and Wolski (2017).
Carvalho, J. C. M. (1957) Catalogue of the Miridae of the World. Part I. Subfamilies Cylapinae, Deraeocorinae and Bryocorinae. Arquivos do Museu Nacional Rio de Janeiro, 44, 1 - 158.
Gorczyca, J. (2006 a) The catalogue of the subfamily Cylapinae Kirkaldy, 1903 of the World (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae). Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum. Vol. 5. Department of Natural History, Upper Silesian Museum, Bytom, 100 pp.
Schuh, R. T. (2002 - 2013) On - line Systematic Catalog of Plant Bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Available from: http: // research. amnh. org / pbi / catalog / (accessed 21 March 2021).
Wolski, A. (2017) Taxonomic review of the plant bug genera Amapacylapus and Cylapus with descriptions of two new species and a key to the genera of Cylapini (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 57 (2), 399 - 455. https: // doi. org / 10.1515 / aemnp- 2017 - 0084
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.