Macrelmis clypeata
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BF705F4-BB24-4BC4-9430-A2AB8A990DDF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6095478 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587F1-AB5E-FFFC-FF55-FC3AFE3E00F3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macrelmis clypeata |
status |
|
clypeata View in CoL species group Hinton 1946
Diagnostic character: parameres and aedeagus of equal size, both short; parameres completely surrounds the aedeagus ( Figs. 5E, F View FIGURE 5 A – F ).
Species: Macrelmis clypeata and M. isus .
Distribution ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ): Trinidad: Maracas ( Hinton 1936). Argentina: Cordoba, Jujuy, Misiones, Salta, San Luis, San Juan ( Manzo & Archangelsky 2001). Brasil: Goiás ( Barbosa et al. 2013), Rio de Janeiro ( Sampaio et al. 2012), Santa Catarina ( Hinton 1946). Bolivia: Sidras and Tarijá ( Manzo & Archangelsky 2008). Paraguay: Guairá ( Shepard & Aguilar Julio 2010).
History of the group: Macrelmis clypeata was considered as closely related to M. tarsalis by Hinton (1936). Afterwords, Hinton (1946) added M. isus to this set of species and formaly presented this group. He defined it as “having the apices of the elytra dehiscent, each elytron being separately rounded at extreme apex, and by the unusual secondary sexual characters of the male” ( Hinton 1946). Despite of this resemblances, the male genitalia of M. tarsalis differs considerably from that of M. isus and M. clypeata . So, only the last two species are considered to compose the clypeata group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Elminae |
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Elminae |
Genus |