Cyzicus tetracerus ( Krynicki, 1830 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-45 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587E6-FFF9-B27E-66D1-CF77FA03DB0E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cyzicus tetracerus ( Krynicki, 1830 ) |
status |
|
Cyzicus tetracerus ( Krynicki, 1830) View in CoL fide
Auduoin, 1837
= Limnadia tetracerus Krynicki, 1830
= Estheria tetracera ( Krynicki, 1830)
= Isaura cycladoides Joly, 1842
= Estheria cycladoides ( Joly, 1842)
= Isaura tetracera ( Krynicki, 1830)
= Cyzicus cycladoides ( Joly, 1842)
= Cyzicus borceai Daday, 1914: 257
= Cyzicus chyzeri Daday, 1913b: 40
= Cyzicus dubiosus Daday, 1913b: 292
= Cyzicus fallax Daday, 1914: 275
= Cyzicus hungaricus Daday, 1913: 25
= Cyzicus intermedius Daday, 1913: 36
= Cyzicus romanus Daday, 1914: 244
= Cyzicus sibericus Daday, 1913b: 296
= Cyzicus simoni Daday, 1914: 305
= Caenestheriella variabilis Daday 1913b: 17 , fide Brtek & Thiéry, 1995
= Caenestheriella cyrenaicus Vecchi, 1922
= Cyzicus cyrenaicus ( Vecchi, 1922)
= Cyzicus ornatus Smirnov, 1932 View in CoL
Comments: The type locality is in the vicinity of Kharkiv (Charkov), Ukraine. Widespread and common: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia (east through Siberia and into the arctic circle), Serbia, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan; “Central Sahara” ( Thiele 1900; Gurney 1909; Daday 1913b 1914; Gauthier 1938; Cottarelli 1971; Šrámek-Hušek et al. 1962; Vekhov 1974; Lebedeva 1982; Stoicescu 2004). Type species of the genus by monotypy ( Mattox 1957b). Joly (1842) and Alonso (1996) provide excellent drawings. Daday (1914) states that C. sibericus is intermediate among several other taxa that were subsequently treated as synonyms of C. tetracerus . Daday (1914) reported C. simoni only from one locality in Lebanon (Beirut), but that it was very similar to C. tetracerus . Cyzicus ornatus was reported from Siberia. Cyzicus variabilis was redescribed by Stoicescu (2004) and presented as a valid species. However, it should be re-examined using modern standards.
Nomina dubia, nuda, and species inquirendae
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cyzicus tetracerus ( Krynicki, 1830 )
Rogers, D. Christopher 2020 |
Cyzicus borceai
Daday E. 1914: 257 |
Cyzicus fallax
Daday E. 1914: 275 |
Cyzicus romanus
Daday E. 1914: 244 |
Cyzicus simoni
Daday E. 1914: 305 |
Cyzicus chyzeri
Daday E. 1913: 40 |
Cyzicus dubiosus
Daday E. 1913: 292 |
Cyzicus sibericus
Daday E. 1913: 296 |
Caenestheriella variabilis
Daday E. 1913: 17 |