Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1914: 205
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-45 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587E6-FFF7-B270-652D-C817FC2DDE4D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1914: 205 |
status |
|
Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1914: 205 , sensu
Dobrynina, 2004
= Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1913b: 90 nomen nudum
= Eocyzicus yanzhouensis Hu, 1993a , fide Naganawa & Orgiljanova, 2000
= E o c y z i c u s p a r a l a y a n g e n s i s H u, 1 9 9 2, f i d e Naganawa & Orgiljanova, 2000
Comments: China, Arabia, Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, northern and central India, Iran, Moldova, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, southern Russia, Syria ( Daday 1914; Hu 1993a; Dobrynina 2004). Redescribed by Dobrynina (2003 2004). Naganawa and Orgiljanova (2000) synonymized E. paralayangensis with E. orientalis . This species should be compared with E. davidi , E. irritans , E. zugmayeri , E. latirostris , E. klunzingeri , and E. saharicus . Dobrynina (2004) suggests that E. orientalis was introduced to the eastern European Steppe Zone by fish farming, through fish larvae imported from Transcaucasia. This species should be compared to E. davidi and E. sahlbergi . Rogers and Padhye (2015) suggest that Daday’s (1915) E. orientalis record from tropical India may be a misidentification.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1914: 205
Rogers, D. Christopher 2020 |
Eocyzicus orientalis
Daday E. 1914: 205 |
Eocyzicus orientalis
Daday E. 1913: 90 |