Helianthecis capitum Gagné, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4158.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:216AD21E-D9CC-4BD6-A0A9-A7C7F679FAF1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6072233 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587BF-317F-BD4B-AD84-FC9F3A62F846 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Helianthecis capitum Gagné |
status |
sp. nov. |
Helianthecis capitum Gagné View in CoL , new species
Figs 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 , 7–18 View FIGURES 7 – 14 View FIGURES 15 – 18 .
Description. Adult: Wing ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ) length: male 2.3–2.9 mm (n = 6, avg. = 2.6); female 2.3–2.7 mm (n=6, avg.=2.5). Head as in Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 14 , palpus 4-segmented, antennal flagellomeres as in Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 7 – 14 . Anepimeron with 12–17 setae (n=10). Acropods as in Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 14 . Male terminalia and postabdomen as in Figs 11–13 View FIGURES 7 – 14 . Female postabdomen as in Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15 – 18 .
Pupa. Anterior segments as in Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15 – 18 .
Larva, third instar: Length, 2.1–2.5 mm (n=10). Spatula and associated papillae as in Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 18 . Eighth and terminal abdominal segments as in Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15 – 18 .
Material examined. HOLOTYPE, male, ex Helianthus petiolaris , 20.ix.1973, Wilbarger Co., Texas, C.E. Rogers . Paratypes: male, 3 females, pupa, 6 pupal exuviae, same data as holotype; female, H. petiolaris , 5.viii.1977, Ulysses, Kansas, C.E. Rogers ; 5 larvae, Helianthus sp., 11.x.1972, Munday, Texas, C.E. Rogers ; 5 larvae, Helianthus annuus , 4.x.1978, Bushland, Texas ; 3 males, female, H. annuus , 6 to 13.viii.1971, Fargo, North Dakota, K. Kamali, emerged 9 to 18.viii.1971 ; 2 males, 1 female, 1 pupa, H. grosseserratus , 30.vii to 23.viii.1979, West Okoboji , Dickinson Co., Iowa, B.W. Minor, emerged 5.viii to 23.viii.1979 .
Etymology. The name capitum , genitive plural of caput (Latin for head), refers to the species' niche in the flower heads of its hosts.
Distribution. The new species was collected in North Dakota, Iowa, Kansas and Texas from heads of Helianthus annuus L., H. grosseserratus M. Martens , and H. petiolaris Nutt.
Remarks. Larvae of this species from Helianthus annuus in Wilbarger Co. , Texas were first reported as Dasineura sp., and adults from Helianthus petiolaris , also in Wilbarger Co., were reported as Rhopalomyia sp. ( Rogers 1977). Rogers et al. (1979) later reported both those larvae and adults as Mayetiola sp. The determinations for both reports were provided by me and reflect my evolving concept for the taxonomic placement of this new gall midge. By the time of the report by Rogers et al. (1979), I had realized that the larvae and adults were the same species due to additional material I had seen from Texas and specimens obtained separately from North Dakota. The exact niche of or damage made by H. capitum is still uncertain. Rogers et al. (1979) stated that, “Although the larvae are thought to feed primarily in the corolla tubes, specimens from North Dakota were reared from floral ovaries.” Specimens were subsequently received from Iowa, reared from "galled inflorescences." That the adults were in all cases reared directly from inflorescences allows us to assume that pupation occurred in the heads, typical of species that live inside galled plant tissue.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Cecidomyiinae |
Genus |