Pseudomicracis elsae Eggers, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5125.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4645A035-17E6-488C-8F10-DA66E146487D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6448745 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587B4-FFBB-FFAE-FF5C-FF71DB85FC95 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudomicracis elsae Eggers, 1920 |
status |
|
Pseudomicracis elsae Eggers, 1920 View in CoL
Pseudomicracis elsae Eggers 1920: 36 View in CoL , orig. spelling
Type material. Holotype, female: Dar-es-Salaam, Ostafrika [ Tanzania] . Holotype lost (Hamburg), not examined.
Diagnosis (transcribed). Length 1.5 mm. Frons impressed between eyes; scapus triangular with a long tuft of setae; club broad with two weakly procurved sutures. Elytral striae not impressed, interstriae with rows of erect fine setae; declivity steep, apex mucronate. Legs widen apically, with three or four small denticles at the outer apical edge.
Distribution. Tanzania.
Remarks. The loss of the type (Hamburg Museum, WWII) and no other verified material makes it difficult to assess the correct position in micracidine classification. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is prudent to maintain taxonomic stability by the application of a diagnosis that embrace the Malagasy species related to P. madagascariensis ( Schedl, 1961) as did Wood (1986). It is apparent from studies on closely related genera in the flagellum clade that all these have a southern African and Malagasy distribution; the occurrence of a single African species in Pseudomicracis will therefore not be evidence to the contrary.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudomicracis elsae Eggers, 1920
Jordal, Bjarte H. 2022 |
Pseudomicracis elsae
Eggers, H. 1920: 36 |