Dolomedes senilis Simon, 1880
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.371.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FF9DC9E8-FA8B-4DB6-9217-0AD307BB1BE3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03954571-B846-FFB2-FF15-089F88E6FEF7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dolomedes senilis Simon, 1880 |
status |
|
Dolomedes senilis Simon, 1880 View in CoL
Figs. 1–4 View Figs
Dolomedes senilis Simon, 1880b: 101 View in CoL ; Song & Zheng, 1982c: 156, figs. 3-4; Hu, 1984: 258,
figs. 271.1-3; Guo, 1985: 132, figs. 2-69.1-3; Song, 1987: 205, fig. 165; Zhang, 1987:
166, figs. 140.1-2; Feng, 1990: 159, figs. 134.1-4; Song, Zhu & Chen, 1999: 347, figs.
202Q, 203J; Song et al., 2001: 266, figs. 166A-B; Zhang et al., 2004: 377, figs. 44-49;
Marusik & Kovblyuk, 2011: 219, figs. 31.8-9; Tanikawa, 2012: 11, figs. 1-2, 7-15; Yin et al., 2012: 879, figs. 440a-g.
Dolomedes strandi Bonnet, 1929a: 268 View in CoL , figs. 1-3; Renner, 1988: 2, figs. 1a, 2-5; Marusik,
1988a: 1471, figs. 1.6-7.
MATERIAL. Mongolia: Bulgan Aimag, Egiyn-Gol River mouth (“Эгин-гол” in the original label) (Selenga River tributary), 1925, 2♀, leg. M.I. Tkachenko ( ZISP) .
DIAGNOSIS. Dolomedes senilis is similar to D. saganus Bösenberg et Strand, 1906 from
China and Japan, but its females can be separated by the rhomboid epigynal fovea with its posterior part not reaching the genital groove (vs inverse pear-shaped, reaching the genital groove in the related species) and by the copulatory ducts packed in a tight coil (vs copulatoty ducts packed in a loose coil in the related species). The male of D. senilis can be diagnosed by the short palpal tibia; the large fulcrum, with its top extending beyond the tip of the median apophysis (vs the palpal tibia long; the fulcrum small, with its top not extending beyond the median apophysis in D. saganus ) (Zhang et al., 2004).
DESCRIPTION. See the descriptions in Yin et al. (2012), Tanikawa (2012) and Zhang et al. (2004).
DISTRIBUTION. Dolomedes senilis is known from the southern part of the Russian Far
East, China (Beijing, Hebei, Hunan and Shaanxi Provinces) and Japan (Hokkaido Island)
(Bonnet, 1929; Yin et al., 2012; Tanikawa, 2012). The new record from Mongolia represents the northern-westernmost locality of the species range. D. senilis is the fourth Dolomedes species recorded from Siberia, to which the mountains of northern Mongolia indeed belong.
COMMENTS. In the photo depicting the female habitus of D. senilis from Japan, a white midline on the carapace and longitudinal light stripes on legs are clearly visible (Tanikawa,
2012: fig. 1). Such details of the coloration are absent from the specimens collected from
Mongolia ( Figs 1–2 View Figs ), the southern part of the Russian Far East (Bonnet, 1929: fig. 1) and
China (Yin et al., 2012: fig. 440a; Zhang et al., 2004: fig. 44). Such differences cold indicate that specimens from the continental Asia and from Japan are likely to belong to separate species.
TAXONOMICAL NOTES. Dolomedes senilis was described on the basis of the material collected from the vicinity of Beijing (Simon, 1880). In 1929, D. strandi Bonnet, 1929 was described from Amur River in the southern part of the Russian Far East. For 75 years, it had habitus, ventral view; 3 – macerated epigyne, dorsal view; 4 – intact epigyne, ventral view.
Scale bars: 1–2 = 2 mm; 3 = 0.2 mm; 4 = 0.5 mm.
been believed that these two were different species, until Zhang et al. (2004) reasoning from the descriptions and illustrations of D. strandi defined that the latter was to be considered a junior synonym of D. senilis .
ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dolomedes senilis Simon, 1880
Fomichev, A. A. 2018 |
Dolomedes strandi Bonnet, 1929a: 268
Bonnet und Anmerkungen 1929: 268 |
Dolomedes senilis
Simon 1880: 101 |