Euseius concordis (Chant)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4048.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DA85433F-27C6-4D5B-9243-F40B46B30C1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5625989 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03952D6D-CA71-FF92-FF41-CD4A4E99F945 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euseius concordis (Chant) |
status |
|
Euseius concordis (Chant) View in CoL
( Figs 1–10 View FIGURES 1 – 5 View FIGURES 6 – 10 )
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) concordis Chant, 1959: 69 . Amblyseius (Iphiseius) concordis .— Muma, 1961: 288. Typhlodromus concordis .— Hirschmann, 1962: 21.
Amblyseius concordis .— Chant & Baker, 1965: 22.
Amblyseius (Euseius) concordis .— Gupta, 2003: 37.
TABLE 1 View TABLE 1 . Measurements (µm) of female type specimens of the concordis species group of the genus Euseius View in CoL or of new female specimens collected in the type localities of each species. O.D. Original description; () Range; - No data; * Unpublished measurements of G.J. de Moraes or J.A. McMurtry; 1 Moraes & McMurtry (1983); 2 Abou-Setta et al. (1991); 3 McMurtry (1983); 4 Guanilo et al. (2008b); 5 Guanilo et al. (2008a); 6 Congdon & McMurtry (1985); 7 McMurtry et al (1985).
Character E View in CoL . brazilli E View in CoL . brazilli E. ho E View in CoL . mesembrinus E View in CoL . caseariae E . concordis E . concordis
O.D. This work O.D./ Holotype 1 Paratype */Other2 O.D./ Holotype * O.D./ Holotype 3 Other4
405 317 (302-347) 320/329 - 308/312 316/317 329 (313–350) DSW 302 222 (210–235) 232/235 - 155/220 176/230 231 (215–243)
31 (26–37) 28 (23–31) 28 27/27–28 29/28 23/30 30 (27–33)
20 (14–25) 19 (16–25) 25/24 22/21–22 34/31 32/37 40 (35–49)
9 (6–10) 10 (9–10) 7/8 7/7–8 -/8 -/10 10 (7–12)
9 (8–10) 10 (9–12) 8/7 7/8 -/8 -/9 10 (8–12)
12 (9–13) 11 (10–12) 11/10 -/10 -/11 -/13 13 (12–15)
12 (10–14) 12 (11–14) 11/8 9 / 10 10/11 - 12 (11–14)
6 (4–7) 6 (5–7) -/5 5 -/5 - 5 (4–7)
14 (11–17) 14 (12–15) 11 11 14 /16 -/17 16 (14–19)
17 (13–19) 16 (15–18) 14/12 14 /13–15 17/20 27/29 24 (19–28)
10 (8–11) 10 (10–11) -/7 7/7–8 -/8 - 9 (8–10)
13 (11–140 12 (10–13) 9/ 8 9/10 10 - 12 (10–13)
13 (11–14) 12 (11–15) 11/10 10 /12–13 11 - 12 (10–14)
62 (57–65) 57 (54–64) 59/58 54/56 65/58 59/64 65 (60–68)
27 (24–32) 24 (22–27) 25/22 18/20–22 43/32 41/52 43 (38–50)
16 (12–18) 15 (14–16) 13/ 12 13 14 /13 –/14 15 (12–17)
19 (13–23) 18 (15–20) 14 14/14–16 –/16 –/16 16 (14–18)
20 (17–25) 18 (16–22) 15/13 14/15–16 -/16 –/18 17 (12–20)
17 (15–20) 16 (14–18) -/14 - 18/16 -/16 17 (14–19)
11 (9–13) 11 (10–13) -/10 - 12/11 - 11 (8–13)
1-St3 - 55 (50–59) - - -/60 - 54 (50–60) 2-St2 - 66 (62–70) - - -/64 - 63 (60–65) 5-St5 75 67 (63–73) - - -/67 - 68 (63–70) LVSant - 54 (52–59) - - 48/47 - 106 (100–113) LVSpost 74 68 (60–80) 72/- - 65/63 50/- 48 (43–58) WVS 99 102 (95–110) 97/- - 118/92 104/- 74 (70–83)
- 24 (22–25) 21/24 - - - 28 (23–30) SgeII - 23 (22–25) 24/26 20/- 25/24 24 27 (24–30) SgeIII - 26 (24–28) 28/30 22/- 27/26 29 30 (28–32) StiIII - 23 (21–25) - - -/22 - 24 (20–26) SgeIV 38 32 (30–35) 42/43 29/- 41/41 41 44 (38–47) StiIV 27 26 (24–30) 26/28 26/- 33/29 27 31 (25–36) StaIV 50 47 (44–53) 49/50 33/36–41 51/49 48 52 (46–57) Calyx 22 17 (16–20) 22 - 26/25 - 26 (23–28)
- 23 (22-25) - - -/22 - 23 (22–24)
- 25 (24–27) 23 - 19/25 - 24 (22–25)
teeth md 1 1 - - 1 - 1
teeth fd 5 3–4 2 - 1/- - 3–4
……continued on the next Page ……continued on the next Page Euseius concordis View in CoL .— Denmark & Muma, 1973: 264; Moraes et al., 2004: 64; Demite et al., 2015.
Euseius flechtmanni View in CoL Denmark & Muma, 1970: 223 (synonymy by Moraes et al., 1982: 18).
Euseius caseariae De Leon, 1967 View in CoL : 21; Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 80; McMurtry & Moraes, 1989: 186. (new synonymy).
Specimens examined. E. concordis View in CoL : holotype and specimens from the type locality (previously reported by Guanilo et al., 2008b), E. flechtmanni View in CoL : 20 specimens from the type locality: Universidad Nacional de Asunción - Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias on Citrus sp., collected in February, 2013.
An examination of the specimens collected in the type locality of E. concordis View in CoL (already reported by Guanilo et al., 2008b) and in the type locality of E. flechtmanni View in CoL , showed them to be very similar to what was reported in their original descriptions and subsequent redescriptions ( Chant & Baker, 1965; McMurtry, 1983; Moraes & McMurtry, 1983; Guanilo et al., 2008b). These observations led us to confirm the synonymy of E. concordis View in CoL and E. flechtmanni View in CoL proposed by Moraes et al. (1982).
McMurtry & Moraes (1989) considered E. caseariae View in CoL to be distinguishable from E. concordis View in CoL by having shorter j3, z4 and s4. Setal measurements of specimens identified as E. concordis View in CoL , from its type locality ( Guanilo et al., 2008b) and from Brazil ( Lopes, 2015), showed a wide variation in the lengths of some setae, especially j1, j3, z2, z4, Z5 and s4. A comparison of the measurements provided by those authors with those of the original description of E. caseariae View in CoL and of our measurements of a paratype of that species led to the conclusion that it is a junior synonym of E. concordis View in CoL .
Character | E. flechtmanni View in CoL O.D. | E. flechtmanni This View in CoL work | E. emanus View in CoL O.D./Paratype5 | E. emanus This View in CoL work | E. hibisci View in CoL O.D./Holotype6 | E. passiflorus View in CoL O.D. | E. quetzalli O.D. | E. tularensis View in CoL O.D. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DSW j1 j3 j4 j5 j6 | 322 213 32 41 10 10 14 | 336 (307–362) 246 (227–260) 30 (26–33) 39 (33–45) 10 (9–10) 10 (9–11) 11 (10–13) | 344/290–315 190/200–225 -/27–30 30/32–35 10/10–10 10/10–10 10/11-- | 324 (312–337) 232 (220–245) 29 (25–31) 34 (28–38) 10 (8–11) 11 (9–15) 11 (10–14) | 325/- 190/- -/31 49/42 -/17 -/17 -/16 | 314 204 23 33 9 9 11 | 341 (312–355) 225 (211–237) 31 (30–35) 34 (31–40) 17 (16–19) 16 (14–19) 17 (14–21) | 352 (316–384) 247 (216–264) 34 (28–39) 40 (30–45) 14 (12–16) 14 (12–16) 15 (12–17) |
J2 J5 | 11 5 | 11 (10–12) 6 (5–7) | 10/10–11 7/6–7 | 12 (10–13) 6 (5–7) | -/17 - | 12 5 | 18 (14–21) 6 (5–6) | 16 (14–17) - |
z2 z4 z5 | 17 31 8 | 21 (17–25) 37 (28–44) 10 (8–11) | 12/12–14 12/16–20 9/8–9 | 16 (14–20) 19 (16–23) 10 (9–11) | 27/32 36/41 -/15 | 17 26 8 | 28 (25–33) 29 (25–35) 16 (13–18) | 21 (17–25) 27 (22–31) 14 (12–15) |
Z1 Z4 Z5 | 11 12 63 | 11 (10–12) 11 (10–12) 67 (61–72) | 10/10–10 10/11–13 –/50–53 | 12 (10–13) 12 (11–14) 57 (53–62) | 14/18 18/21 68/71 | 12 16 55 | 17 (14–19) 21 (18–25) 62 (59–68) | 16 (14–19) 18 (14–20) 66 (58–74) |
s4 S2 | 50 15 | 54 (45–60) 16 (13–18) | 24/27–34 12/13–15 | 28 (20–36) 15 (13–18) | 54 32/31 | 38 16 | 43 (40–51) 24 (20–26) | 43 (33–50) 22 (15–27) |
S4 S5 r3 | 16 18 14 | 18 (15–21) 20 (15–26) 19 (15–22) | 15/15–17 15/16–16 10/13–15 | 17 (15–20) 18 (16–22) 18 (15–22) | 36/35 36/39 -/21 | 18 20 17 | 27 (24–32) 33 (29–41) 20 (18–22) | 24 (17–28) 29 (20–37) 20 (16–23) |
R1 St1-St3 St2-St2 St5-St5 LVSant | 11 - - - - | 13 (11–14) 56 (52–58) 67 (61–72) 71 (65–77) 54 (47–58) | 11/13–13 -/65 -/55 -/75 -/56–58 | 13 (11–15) 56 (50–58) 64 (58–67) 71 (68–75) 61 (51-70) | -/16 - - - - | 12 - - - - | 13 (12–14) - - 89 (84–96) 56 (51–60) | 14 (12–19) - - 99 (90–111) 55 (48–64) |
LVSpost WVS SgeI SgeII SgeIII StiIII SgeIV StiIV StaIV | - - - - - - 39 30 52 | 72 (57–85) 106 (100–116) 27 (23–30) 26 (22–28) 28 (24–32) 23 (20–26) 40 (34–45) 28 (23–32) 49 (43–52) | -/71–74 -/105–105 -/20–20 -/18–18 -/21–22 -/20–20 -/32–32 -/22–22 -/37–37 | 78 (73–92) 106 (100–112) 21 (20–24) 21 (18–23) 24 (21–27) 21 (19–25) 29 (20–35) 24 (20–28) 36 (25–42) | 68/- 99/- - - - - - - - | - - - - - - 25 27 28 | 71 (64–78) 106 (99–111) 25 (23–29) 25 (23–27) 29 (27–30) - 43 (40–47) 35 (32–39) 65 (59–67) | 77 (62–86) 112 (99–121) 26 (23–29) 26 (23–29) 35 (31–39) - 58 (51–64) 43 (33–48) 72 (64–80) |
Calyx Md | - - | 29 (26–35) 24 (22–26) | -/20 - | 23 (19–28) 23 (21–24) | - - | 8 - | 21 (16–25) - | 28 (23–38) 26 (24–27) |
Fd # teeth md | - - | 24 (22-25) 1 | - 1/- | 24 (22–25) 1 | - - | - - | - 1 | 28 (25–30) 1 |
# teeth fd | - | 4 | 2/- | 3-5 | - | - | 5 | 3 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Euseius concordis (Chant)
Lopes, Paula C., Mcmurtry, James A. & De Moraes, Gilberto J. 2015 |
Amblyseius (Euseius) concordis
Gupta 2003: 37 |
Euseius flechtmanni
Moraes 1982: 18 |
Denmark 1970: 223 |
Euseius caseariae
McMurtry 1989: 186 |
Moraes 1988: 80 |
De 1967: 21 |
Amblyseius concordis
Chant 1965: 22 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) concordis
Hirschmann 1962: 21 |
Muma 1961: 288 |
Chant 1959: 69 |