Eucarlia tampolo, Wesener, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5529.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:716EDF67-C933-484D-911B-4585B11187A6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14034010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0394B500-FFDA-FFAD-FF32-2FFDD595FC8C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eucarlia tampolo |
status |
sp. nov. |
? Eucarlia tampolo sp. nov.
Fig. 10A–H View FIGURE 10
Material examined. Holotype: 1 M, FMNH-INS 7796 , Toamasina, Station Forestiere de Tampolo , 10 m, 17°17.2’ S, 49°24.5’ E, coll. S.M. Goodman, pitfalls, 3–16.iv.1997. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 4 M (mature?), 5 F, FMNH-INS 7796 , same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Derivatio nominis. tampolo, noun in apposition, after the littoral forest of Tampolo, the type and only known locality of the species.
Diagnosis.? Eucarlia tampolo sp. nov. shares the presence of a strong transverse ridge across the mentum, separating a basal, transversely striate part and an apical, smooth part, which is recessed when the gnathochilarium is viewed from below ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ) with species of the genera Flagellobolus Wesener, 2009 , Riotintobolus Wesener, 2009 , Pseudocentrobolus Wesener, 2009 , Granitobolus Wesener, 2009 , Caprobolus Wesener, 2009 , Alluviobolus Wesener, 2009 , Ostinobolus Wesener, 2009 and Zehnterobolus Wesener, 2009. Sperm canal of posterior gonopod apically free ( Fig. 10H, I View FIGURE 10 ), like in species of Flagellobolus and Caprobolus , but differs from all known Malagasy Spirobolida species in the combination of a simple wide anterior gonopod lacking projections or processes ( Fig. 10F, G View FIGURE 10 )) with a special shape of the posterior gonopod ( Figs 10H, I View FIGURE 10 ).
Description
Measurements: All 43+0 rings. Male holotype 38 mm long, 3.2 wide. Largest female circa 46 mm long, 4.8 mm wide. Habitus small and slender, body rings like Granitobolus Wesener, 2009 , thick.
Colour strongly faded, mesozonites dark, metazonite white. Collum dark except for posterior margin. Anal scale and part of anal valves white, rest of telson black. Legs and antennae whitish.
Head: Eyes very large, male eyes with 35 ommatidia, arranged in 7 rows, female similar. Antennae short, male antennae reaching back to third, female to second ring. Mandible basal joint without projection. Gnathochilarium with ridge, stipites each with three marginal setae, lamellae linguales each with two setae located behind one another ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Female leg 1 with fused coxo-sternite ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ), leg 2 also with coxo-sternite, coxal part elongated ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ). Legs 8+ in both sexes at each podomere, except tarsus, with single ventral spine. Tarsus in male ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ) with tarsal pad (except for posterior legs) and a pair of ventral spines. Claw large, apical spine quite small ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ).
Ozopores starting at ring 6, located on or even posterior of suture ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ).
Telson without projecting preanal scale, inconspicuous subanal scale, anal valves with weak lips ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ).
Vulvae bivalve-like, posterior valve slightly overlapping anterior valve.
Male coxae 3–7 unmodified, but tarsi 3 - midbody legs with a tarsal pad.
Anterior gonopods sternite well-rounded, not protruding as high as coxite process ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ). Sternal apodemes ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) short. Coxite wide, projecting mesally into a wide, broadly-rounded process ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ), tip of process slightly overreaching telopodite process mesally but not apically ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ). Telopodite apically expanding into a wide, well-rounded process, process almost as wide as base of telopodite ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ).
Posterior gonopod clearly separated into coxite and telopodite, with coxite greatly extended and longer than telopodite ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ). Sternite small but sclerotized, triangular ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ). Coxite mesally with a single groove, elongated into a long stem ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ). Telopodite long, but shorter than elongated coxite ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ), basally deeply divided into two branches, main branch and mesal branch, both curved mesally ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ). Main branch slender on whole length, apical part slightly slenderer than basal 3/4, with well-rounded tip weakly curved towards mesal branch, sclerotized. Mesal branch with basal half sclerotized, apical half twice as wide as basal half and membranous ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ). Tip of mesal branch with two openings of the sperm canal ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ), the upper canal strongly and freely projecting mesally from membranous part of branch ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ).
Remarks. The littoral forest of Tampolo is currently also the only known locality of the critically endangered Tampolo giant pill-millipede Zoosphaerium tampolo Wesener, 2009 ( Rudolf & Wesener 2017c).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |