Megaclavatula grunerti, Harzhauser & Landau & Janssen, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5123.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:036F6B4D-CDCC-4CD7-A914-9A1D8C7A097A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039487D1-FFC0-FFEB-FFBA-FF3C6C44FD45 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megaclavatula grunerti |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megaclavatula grunerti View in CoL nov. sp.
Figs 21C View FIGURE 21 1 –C View FIGURE 1 3 View FIGURE 3 , D 1 –D View FIGURE 1 3, 3Q View FIGURE 3 , 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6
Pleurotoma tuberculata Münster —Münster in Goldfuss 1841: 20, pl. 171, figs 6b (only) [non Pleurotoma tuberculata Pusch, 1837 ].
Pleurotoma asperulata Lam. — Hörnes 1854: 341, pl. 37, figs 4a–b [non Megaclavatula asperulata ( Lamarck, 1822) View in CoL ].
Clavatula View in CoL c.f. Evae R. Hoernes i Auinger— Friedberg 1912: 195, pl. 12, fig. 10 [non Megaclavatula evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) View in CoL ].
Clavatula Evae R. Hoernes View in CoL i Auinger var.— Friedberg 1912: 195, text-fig. 48 [non Megaclavatula evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) View in CoL ].
Clavatula Evae R. Hoernes View in CoL i Auinger— Friedberg 1938: 143 [non Megaclavatula evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) View in CoL ].
C [lavatula]. (C [lavatula]) asperulata (Lm.) View in CoL — Sieber 1958a: 157 (partim) [non Megaclavatula asperulata ( Lamarck, 1822) View in CoL ].
Clavatula asperulata View in CoL cf. evae Hoernes et Auinger View in CoL — Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 32, pl. 15, fig. 19 [non Megaclavatula evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) View in CoL ].
Clavatula polonica (Pusch, 1837) View in CoL — Bałuk 2003: 36 (partim), pl. 1, figs 4–6, pl. 2, figs 3, 5 [non Megaclavatula polonica (Pusch, 1837) View in CoL ].
Type material. Holotype: NHMW 2021 View Materials /0133/0001, SL: 77.8 mm, MD: 26.3 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), figs 21C 1 – C 3 . Paratypes: NHMW 2021 View Materials /0127/0003, SL: 73.5 mm , MD: 25.1 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria) , figs 21D 1 –D3, 3Q; NHMW 2015 View Materials /0389/0482, 1 spec., Enzesfeld ( Austria) ; NHMW 2992 View Materials z0181/0245, 1 spec., Gainfarn ( Austria) , SMF 351869 About SMF /3, Grund ( Austria) ; NHMW 1857 View Materials /0024/0027, 2 spec., Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) .
Additional studied material. NHMW 1849 View Materials /0005/0044, Guntersdorf ( Austria) , SL: 61.0 mm, MD: 22.7 mm, illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1891, pl. 44, figs 5a–b); Guntersdorf ( Austria) ; NHMW 2021 View Materials /0135/0001, 10 spec., Guntersdorf ( Austria) ; NHMW 1851 View Materials /0026/0044, 3 spec., Grund ( Austria) ; NHMW 1851 View Materials /0002/0054, 12 spec., Grund ( Austria) .
Type locality. Enzesfeld ( Austria), Vienna Basin .
Type stratum. Silty sand of the Baden Formation.
Age. Middle Miocene, middle Badenian (late Langhian).
Etymology. In honor of Patrick Grunert (University Köln, Germany), in recognition of his contribution on Paratethyan oceanography.
Diagnosis. Shell large, solid, moderately broad fusiform with tripartite sculpture of beaded spiral cords on early teleoconch whorls and weak subsutural collar with small, pointed tubercles on later whorls. Slightly inflated, convex periphery on last whorl. Spiral sculpture weakening, becoming subobsolete on penultimate and last whorls.
Description. Shell large, solid, moderately broad fusiform with conical spire; apical angle ~30–35°. Protoconch not preserved. Teleoconch of at least ten whorls, initially flat-sided, becoming distinctly concave on sixth teleoconch whorl, concavity decreasing again on later whorls, which rapidly increase in height. Early teleoconch whorls with tripartite spiral sculpture comprising prominent, beaded subsutural cord, slightly weaker, beaded cord in concave mid-whorl portion, and prominent coarsely beaded suprasutural cord. Delicate spiral threads may appear on adsutural cords. Sculpture changing around fifth to sixth teleoconch whorl; subsutural cord becomes weak subsutural collar with low, wide-spaced, spiny, trigonal tubercles placed some distance below suture; mid-whorl cord weakens and disappears. Beads on suprasutural cord weaken to form broad, low, poorly developed tubercles partly covered by subsequent whorl. Fine spiral threads cover entire shell surface, overriding beads at abapical suture; sculpture further weakening on last two whorls. Suture narrowly incised, weakly undulating. Last whorl ~55–60% of total height, poorly delimited spinous subsutural collar. Weakly concave subsutural ramp. Rounded moderately inflated shoulder, weakly delimited shoulder. Base moderately constricted, spiral sculpture weak. Siphonal fasciole of medium length, moderately delimited, twisted.Aperture moderately wide, pyriform; outer lip not thickened, smooth within. Anal sinus wide, moderately deep to deep, asymmetrically V-shaped, with apex below subsutural collar in deepest part of subsutural concavity. Siphonal canal moderately long, wide, twisted and recurved, shallowly notched at tip. Columella weakly excavated in upper third, weakly twisted below, smooth. Columellar and parietal callus thickened, sharply delimited, forming broad callus rim, without forming pseudoumbilicus.
Discussion. Surprisingly, this large species has been overlooked so far by previous authors because the shells were either confused with M. asperulata ( Lamarck, 1822) (Hoernes 1854; Sieber 1958a), M. evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) ( Friedberg 1912; Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972) or with M. polonica (Pusch, 1837) ( Bałuk 2003) . The northeastern Atlantic M. asperulata ( Lamarck, 1822) is smaller, has more prominent, spiny tubercles and prominent spiral cords on the base (see Peyrot 1931, pl. 5 figs 3–5, 9). Megaclavatula grunerti nov. sp. is reminiscent of M. evae ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1891) , but differs from that species in its slightly wider spire angle, more concave early teleoconch whorls, the tuberculate subsutural collar, the more convex periphery of the last whorl, the more constricted base, the absence of weakly tuberculate basal and peribasal cords and the prominent spiral sculpture. A separation from M. polonica is clearly based on the broader outline and markedly spinose sculpture of M. polonica . The morphologically closest species is ‘C. ’ tortonica Peyrot, 1931 , from the middle Miocene of France, which is even more slender and has much more prominent spiral sculpture, which persists onto the base (see Peyrot 1931, pl. 5, figs 19, 24 30-31). The high, slender spire distinguishes M. grunerti from M. laevigata ( Eichwald, 1830) .
Paleoenvironment. Coastal inner neritic environments with sea grass based on occurrences at Gainfarn and Enzesfeld ( Austria) ( Zuschin et al. 2007).
Distribution in Central Paratethys. Badenian (middle Miocene): North Alpine-Carpathian Foreland Basin: Guntersdorf, Grund ( Austria) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1891); Korytnica Basin: Korytnica ( Poland) ( Friedberg 1912; Bałuk 2003); Vienna Basin: Enzesfeld, Gainfarn ( Austria) (hoc opus); Bükk Mountains: Borsodbóta ( Hungary) ( Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972); Făget Basin: Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) (hoc opus).
MD |
Museum Donaueschingen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Megaclavatula grunerti
Harzhauser, Mathias, Landau, Bernard & Janssen, Ronald 2022 |
Clavatula polonica (Pusch, 1837)
Baluk, W. 2003: 36 |
Clavatula asperulata
Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. 1972: 32 |
Clavatula Evae R. Hoernes
Friedberg, W. 1938: 143 |
Clavatula
Friedberg, W. 1912: 195 |
Clavatula Evae R. Hoernes
Friedberg, W. 1912: 195 |
Pleurotoma asperulata Lam.
Hornes, M. 1854: 341 |