Stenaelurillus arambagensis (Biswas & Biswas, 1992)

Logunov, Dmitri V. & Azarkina, Galina N., 2018, Redefinition and partial revision of the genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 430, pp. 1-126 : 20-21

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.430

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5902A879-CD11-4CC3-A802-7C0D2F8059BE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3793763

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039487C1-166D-775E-FE0B-2E8F50F6FEB6

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Stenaelurillus arambagensis (Biswas & Biswas, 1992)
status

 

Stenaelurillus arambagensis (Biswas & Biswas, 1992) View in CoL

Figs 57–62 View Figs 57–62 , 509

Marpissa arambagensis Biswas & Biswas, 1992: 390 View in CoL , figs 20–22 (D ♀). Holotype in the National Zoological Collection , Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India; not examined.

Stenaelurillus digitus Prajapati, Murthappa, Sankaran & Sebastian, 2016: 327 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 1C–D, 6A–D, 7A–E, 8A–C, 9A–D (D♂ ♀). Synonymized by Caleb et al. (2017).

Diagnosis

This species can easily be separated from all other species of Stenaelurillus , except for S. albus Sebastian, Sankaran, Malamel & Joseph, 2015 , by the presence of the long, finger-shaped distal projection of the functional tegulum ( Fig. 57 View Figs 57–62 : DP), the unique feature of S. arambagensis and S. albus . The only difference between the two related species is the presence of a more prominent, stout embolus in S. arambagensis ( Fig. 57 View Figs 57–62 ; Caleb et al. 2017: fig. 14), which is not visible in ventral view in S. albus (see Sebastian et al. 2015: fig. 2E, G), provided the latter authors correctly illustrated the embolic division. Females of both species differ in the shape of the primary spermathecae: round in S. arambagensis (see Caleb et al. 2017: fig. 17) and C-shaped in S. albus (see Sebastian et al. 2015: fig. 3B–C).

Material examined

PAKISTAN: 1 ♂, Punjab, Jehlum, 32°04′58.8″ N, 73°04′01.2″ E, 191 m a.s.l., 22 Mar. 2012, S. Din leg. ( CBGO).

Remarks

This species has been (re)described and illustrated in detail by Prajapati et al. (2016: sub. S. digitus ) and Caleb et al. (2017). It is worth mentioning that both Sebastian et al. (2015) and Prajapati et al. (2016) mis-coded sclerites of the embolic division in S. albus and S. arambagensis respectively. What they coded as the ‘embolus’ is actually the distal projection of the functional tegulum; see above under ‘Morphological notes’ for further details. The true embolus is seen in S. arambagensis as the stout, pointed sclerite partly hidden behind the tegular tip (E on Fig. 57 View Figs 57–62 ).

Distribution

India (Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, West Bengal) and Pakistan (Punjab) ( Fig. 509 View Fig ) ( Caleb et al. 2017; present data).

N

Nanjing University

E

Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh

S

Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Salticidae

Genus

Stenaelurillus

Loc

Stenaelurillus arambagensis (Biswas & Biswas, 1992)

Logunov, Dmitri V. & Azarkina, Galina N. 2018
2018
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF