Iphidonopsis sculptus Gwiazdowicz, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4952.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDBB59EE-CA93-4D6B-8E70-554A36D6D01B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697814 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039387CC-4F27-1320-FF48-FBC196EBFECF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Iphidonopsis sculptus Gwiazdowicz, 2004 |
status |
|
Iphidonopsis sculptus Gwiazdowicz, 2004 View in CoL
( Figs 1–36 View FIGURES 1–2 View FIGURES 3–6 View FIGURES 7–10 View FIGURES 11–16 View FIGURES 17–23 View FIGURES 24–30 View FIGURES 31–38 )
Iphidonopsis sculptus Gwiazdowicz, 2004: 155 View in CoL .
Specimens examined. CANADA, ALBERTA PROVINCE: 2 females, 1 male, 2.5 mi. (4 km) SE Kananaskis Forest Experiment Station, ex bracket fungi on spruce log, 12.VIII.1970, leg. E. Lindquist; 2 females, Harvey Pass, Banff National Park, ex Dryocoetes affaber (Mann.) View in CoL [ Coleoptera View in CoL : Curculionidae View in CoL : Scolytinae ], 12.VII.1968, leg. unspecified. RUSSIA, TVER’ REGION: 1 female, Central Forest State Reserve, spruce forest, ex Fomitopsis pinicola View in CoL (Fungi: Fomitopsidaceae View in CoL ), 7.VIII.2019, leg. A.V. Alexandrova; KARELIA, PETROZAVODSK REGION: 16 females, 2 males, Kivach Nature Reserve, spruce forest, ex Fomitopsis pinicola View in CoL , 26.IX.2020, leg. A. Zuyev; MOSCOW REGION: 1 female, Istra City vicinity, Novorakovo vil., ex Fomitopsis pinicola View in CoL on dead Betula pendula View in CoL (coexistant with Zerconopsis remiger (Kramer, 1876) View in CoL and Z. michaeli Evans et Hyatt, 1960 View in CoL ), 17.VI.2010, leg. O. Makarova; 1 female, Moscow city, Pokrovsko-Streshnevo Park, ex Fomitopsis pinicola View in CoL on Alnus glutinosa View in CoL log (coexistent with Zerconopsis remiger View in CoL and Z. michaeli View in CoL ), 20.VII.2020, leg. O. Makarova; KOMI REPUBLIC: 4 females, 8 males, 3 deutonymphs, Pechoro-Ilychskii Nature Reserve, Yaksha vil. vicinity, mossy spruce forest, ex Trametes hirsuta View in CoL (Fungi: Polyporaceae View in CoL ), 27.IX.2003, leg. O. Makarova; ALTAI: 1 female, Central Altai, Seminskii Pass, 1700 m a.s.l., 51°02’ N 85°36’ E, Pinus sibiricus – Picea obovata View in CoL forest, in litter, 20.VII. 2001, leg. I.I. Marchenko; 1 female, West Altai, Ust-Koksa District, Krasnaya Mt., 1900 m a.s.l., 50°05’ N 85°11’ E, alpine meadow with Pinus sibiricus , in litter, 23.VII.2017, leg. I.I. Marchenko; WEST SAYAN: 2 females, 1 male, Khakassia, 40 km from Abaza, along river Korasibo, 700 m a.s.l., 52°35’ N 90°08’ E, Abies sibirica – Picea obovata View in CoL – Pinus sibiricus taiga, in litter, 25.VI.2013, leg. I.I. Marchenko; KHABAROVSKII KRAI: 1 female, Bikin District, environs of Boytsovo vil., 120 m a.s.l., 46°58′ N 134°19′ E, mixed forest with Pinus koraiensis View in CoL , in litter, 5.IX.1991, leg. I.I. Volonikhina (Marchenko); PRIMORSKII KRAI: 2 females, 2 males, Ussurijskii Nature Reserve, 43°33’ N 132°16’ E, mixed forest with Pinus koraiensis View in CoL , in litter, 15.VII.1988, leg. L.G. Grishina.
Redescription. Adults. Middle-sized mites with idiosoma rather pentagonal (especially pronounced in unfed mites), its anterior part triangular, lateral and posterior margins straight ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–2 , 3 View FIGURES 3–6 ). Mature adults dark-yellow or brownish in colour. Dorsal and anal/ventrianal shields strongly sclerotised and ornamented ( Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1–2 View FIGURES 3–6 ). Dorsal shield covering entire dorsal and often lateral idiosoma, without lateral incisions, with lateral margins notched in males and unfed females ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–23 ) but almost smooth midlaterally in swollen females ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ). Anterior and lateral areas of dorsal shield with sharp comb-like ornamentation, medial area with six pairs of deep depression with angular margins (three smaller pairs of depression on podonotal region, three larger pairs on opisthonotal region) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–2 ). Most dorsal setae smooth, of moderate size or long, with hair-like tips ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ). Five pairs of dorsal gland pores well developed (gdj 2, gdj 4, gdz 6, gdZ 3, gdZ 4); dorsal lyrifissures hardly discernible, six pairs on opisthonotal region and one pair, Rp, on soft cuticle ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ).
Female. Idiosomal dorsum ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–2 , 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ). Dorsal shield length 484–612 by 292–360 width, moderately broad, length/width 1.59–1.75, its maximal width at level of setae J 1 ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ). Podonotal region normally bearing 22 pairs of setae including all r -series setae (j 1–6, z 1–6, s 1–6, r 2–5). Opisthonotal region with 14 pairs of setae (S 2 always absent, R 1, R 2 on soft cuticle). Among dorsal setae, j 1 (9–13) and z 1 (8–11) shortest, awl-like, sometimes attenuated, inserted ventrally on ventrally bent anterior shield margin ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–16 ); setae s 1, s 2 (both 16–20), r 2–4 (20–28) very thin; seta J 5 (24–34) ciliated basally; caudal setae S 5 and Z 5 (44–56), directed posteromedially; other setal lengths from 26–38 (z 2, j 3) to 48–70 (S 4, Z 4); marginal setae R 1 and R 2 24–34, inserted laterally or ventrally on soft cuticle.
Idiosomal venter ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–2 , 11, 12, 14, 15 View FIGURES 11–16 ). Base of tritosternum slightly longer (20–24) than wide (13–16); laciniae 88–100 long, fused for nearly one third of entire length, with sparse long barbs along free part and short lateral spicules on fused area ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11–16 ). Presternal sclerotisation undeveloped.All ventral setae smooth, needle-like. Sternal shield 90–108 length by minimal width between coxae II 66–76, consolidated with endopodal platelets between coxae I–II (shield width at this level 128–144) and between coxae II–III (shield width at this level 112–134) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–16 ); anterior and posterior margins of shield weakly concave or straight; reticulation usually hardly visible, slightly lineate along lateral margins; shield with typical setae st 1–3 (17–20) and lyrifissures iv 1–3, vestigial gland pores gv 1 rarely visible on its posterior margin ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11–16 ). Setae st 4 (16–19) on soft cuticle. Endopodal strips between coxae III and IV free. Epigynal shield length 114–136 by 66–76 wide, faintly reticulate, with lateral margins slightly widened posteriorly; seta st 5 (20–22) and paragenital poroids iv 5 off shield; anterior hyaline flap short, not extending to posterior margin of sternal shield. Epigynal shield flanked by strong subcutaneous sclerites connected with pericoxal strips behind coxa IV. Four postgenital platelets vestigial, hidden in common transverse dermal fold; one more pair of bacilliform platelets formed between setae JV 1 and ZV 1. Two pairs of bacilliform metapodal platelets present, smaller anterior platelets 11–18 x 2–5, larger posterior platelets 38–42 x 8–9. Exopodal platelets between coxae I–II and II–III small, triangular or rhomboid, hardly visible in ventral aspect; their apices encompassing opening of cutaneous glands gvb 1 and gvb 2, respectively. Anal shield expansive, generally subtrapezoidal or broadly suboval, well sclerotised, with convex anterolateral margins variably smooth or crenulate ( Figs 11, 15 View FIGURES 11–16 ) and wide cribrum between poorly visible openings of gland pores gv 3, wider (164–168) than long (108–124), length/width 0.64–0.76, clearly pitted and slightly reticulate; paranal setae (19–22) inserted at level of posterior margin of anus, shorter than tubercle-based postanal seta (24–33), all circumanal setae needle-like; distance between anal opening and anterior shield margin 2–3 times smaller than distance between anal opening and posterior shield margin. Opisthogastric region with ten pairs of setae (JV 1–5, ZV 1–5), openings of gland pores gv 2 and four pairs of poroids; length of opisthogastric setae varying from 19–20 (ZV 1) to 30–42 (JV 5, Z V 5). Peritrematal shield rather wide, smooth, fused with ventrally bent dorsal shield margin anteriorly and exopodal platelet enveloping coxa IV posteriorly ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–16 ); lyrifissures ip 1–3 and glands gp 1–2 present. Peritreme with crenulate margins, relatively wide (268–308 x 10–14), reaching seta j 1 anteriorly. Spermathecal apparatus not visible.
Gnathosoma ( Figs 8–10 View FIGURES 7–10 , 13, 16 View FIGURES 11–16 , 26 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Gnathotectum narrow (15–18), triramous; middle process apically split (3–5 partite), slightly longer (18) than side laterally dentate processes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–10 ). Subcapitulum ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 11–16 ) as long (82– 85) as wide (79–84). Deutosternum of even, moderate width (14–15) ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 11–16 ) or broadened posteriorly up to 19–20 (as on Fig. 27 View FIGURES 24–30 ), with seven rows of numerous denticles (9–21 denticles in each row), clearly bordered. Hypostomatic pairs hp 1 (41–44) and hp 3 (34–36) sometimes undulate, much longer than hp 2 (16–19) and pc (19–20), all setae attenuate. Corniculi rather small, 32–35 x 9–11. Internal malae somewhat longer than corniculi, sharply narrowing, with lateral margins very shortly fimbriated proximally. Buccal cavity with fimbriated paralabra well developed ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Chelicera weak, its length without basal segment 143–159; basal segment length 54–66, with paraxial wall more elongated (as on Fig. 21b View FIGURES 17–23 ); cheliceral digits of moderate size, ca 1.5 longer than corniculus. Fixed digit of chela with one large blunt tooth in paraxial position and thin needle-like pilus dentilis in antiaxial position; distal part of fixed digit grooved, ending in apical hook and two small opposed denticles on sides of groove margins, with circular depression between them ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–10 ); dorsal seta (16–17) lanceolate; lateral and dorsal lyrifissures narrow, hardly visible. Movable digit (37–40) bidentate, its arthrodial membrane smooth. Palp length 128–152; internal seta of trochanter (40–48) resembling hp 1 in form and length but swollen basally, much longer than external seta (14–16); palp with three typically specialised thick setae on femur and genu; femoral al and genual al -1 12–17 long, conical apically; genual al -2 much longer (20–23), flattened apically, with blunt oblique tip ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–16 ); palp tarsus with two distinctive setae—one thick truncate (20–22) and one sinuous (S-like) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–10 ).
Legs ( Figs 28, 29 View FIGURES 24–30 , 33, 34 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Legs of moderate length (I 304–396, II 272–384, III 260–344, IV 332–468); leg I clearly shorter than dorsal shield. Length of tarsus I 64–94, tarsus IV 100–150. Leg chaetome as described for genus Zerconopsis ( Lindquist and Evans, 1965) ; setation of legs I, II, III, IV, genua: 12–10–8–7; tibiae: 12–9–7–7; chaetotactic formulae for genua I–II–III–IV: (2–3/2, 2/1–2) (2–3/1, 2/1–1) (1–2/1, 2/1–1) (1–2/1, 2/0–1); tibiae: (2–3/2, 2/1–2) (2–2/1, 2/1–1) (1–1/1, 2/1–1) (1–1/1, 2/1–1); seta av -2 on genu I and tibia I present; femur I with seta pl -2 moved ventrally (as on Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Setae of legs smooth, spiniform or hair-like distally, generally of moderate length or short, only tarsus I distally with four long thin setae and tarsi II–IV each with dorso-proximal setae ad -2, pd -2 curved, almost as long as interval from their insertion to apex of tarsus ( Figs 33, 34 View FIGURES 31–38 ); most dorsal and several lateral and ventral setae on femora, genua and tibiae of all legs inserted on tubercles (as on Figs 24, 25, 28, 29 View FIGURES 24–30 ); distal verticil setae on tarsi II–IV rather small, almost evenly distant from apex; av -1, pv -1 (11–15) slightly shorter than al -1, pl -1 (13–18) (as on Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Ambulacrum I on short pedicel, claws I (8–10) twice smaller than claws II–IV (14–17). Ambulacra of legs II–IV (length 24–32) with short thin paradactyli (9–14) hardly extending beyond apices of claws (as on Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Tarsi II–IV with apical setae ad -1 and pd -1 small (10–15), about half as long as pretarsus to base of claws. Tarsus I with 7 rod-like solenidia (5 of them inserted apically).
Male. Idiosomal dorsum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–6 ). Dorsal shield length 398–456 by 234–280 width, length/width 1.61–1.82. Chaetotaxy and ornamentation of dorsal shield similar to that of female but setae j 2–6, z 2, z 5, J 1–5 (18–28) much shorter than setae in series Z and S (40–50). Seta j 1 awl-like, short (8–10); z 1 very thin (6–11); length of s 1, s 2 14–15, r 2–4 16–20; posterior marginal series only with one seta, R 1 (18–20).
Idiosomal venter ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 3–6 , 17, 18, 22, 23 View FIGURES 17–23 ). Tritosternum slightly smaller than in female: base 14–18 long, 11–13 wide; laciniae 68–76 long, distally with long barbs. Sternitigenital shield united with endopodal platelets developed between coxae I–II and II–III ( Figs 17, 23 View FIGURES 17–23 ); its anterior margin medially concave, tightly abutting genital valve, posterior margin convex; shield length 160–174, width before coxae II 114–120, width at midlevel of coxae II 60–66, width at level of middle angles 108–118, width at midlevel of coxae IV 44–54; glands gvb 1 and gvb 2 associated with triangular exopodal platelets between coxae I–II and II–III, respectively ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17–23 ). Endocoxal angular platelets between coxae III–IV free. Sternitigenital shield with vestigial reticulate ornamentation, three pairs of lyrifissures iv 1–3, and setae st 1–3, st 5 (17–19) usually slightly longer than seta st 4 (13–17). Genital valve transverse oval (11– 13 x 24–32), inner funnel weakly narrowing ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–23 ). Leg acetabula II and III with lateral margins strengthened by row of small exopodal sclerites ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–23 ). Poroids iv 5 inserted on soft cuticle between sternitigenital and ventrianal shields. Ventrianal shield 144–160 long and 170–211 wide at level of setae ZV 1, length/width 0.75–0.91, clearly reticulated anteriorly and coarsely punctate behind setae JV 2, subtrapezoidal in form ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–23 ), with anterior margin generally convex, undulate and lateral margins often bent dorsally, consolidated with metapodal platelets ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–23 ). Ventrianal shield with 7–8 pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV 1–5, ZV 1–3; ZV 1 and nearest lyrifissure rarely on soft cuticle), three circumanal setae, two pairs of poroids and well developed openings of glands gv 3. Cribrum narrow (7–10), usually bent dorsally. Setae ZV 4 on soft cuticle.Among opisthogastric setae, ZV 1 shortest (11–17), JV 5, ZV 4 longest (up to 24–31); circumanal setae 16–20. Peritrematal shield anteriorly reduced, peritreme 248–268 x 8–11.
Gnathosoma ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 3–6 , 19–21 View FIGURES 17–23 , 26a, 27, 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Form and size of gnathotectum (width 13–17, middle process length 16–20) similar to female; subcapitulum (70–72 x 68–76) and corniculus (23–25 x 9–10) smaller, hypostomatic seta hp 2 (14–16) and subcapitular seta pc (15–19) shorter than in female ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ), length of hypostomatic seta hp 1 40–48, hp 3 35–39; internal malae in contrast to female distinctly ciliated; salivary stylus apically narrowing, 25 long ( Fig. 26a View FIGURES 24–30 ). Deutosternum often widening posteriorly from 10–12 to 18–20 ( Figs 27, 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Chelicera length without basal segment 116–128; basal segment length 52–62; fixed digit of chela with one large tooth and small denticle in paraxial position and thin needle-like pilus dentilis in antiaxial position; distal part of fixed digit grooved ( Fig. 21a View FIGURES 17–23 ); movable digit 32–38 long, with one tooth and long tube-like spermatodactyl protruding far beyond tip of digit (length of free part 50–58) and directed downward ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 3–6 , 21 View FIGURES 17–23 , 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Palp (112–118 long) shorter than in female; trochanter internal seta 36–44 in length, trochanter external seta 11–13, genual al -1 and femoral al 12–13, genual al -2 18–21, tarsal apical macroseta 19–21.
Legs ( Figs 24, 25 View FIGURES 24–30 , 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Length of legs I–IV: 276–292 (much shorter than idiosoma), 240–268, 236–256, and 298–324, respectively; length of tarsus I 64–75, tarsus IV 96–158. Chaetotaxy as in female including ventral position of seta pl -2 on femur I ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Legs without dimorphically modified setae. All ambulacral structures as in female but smaller (ambulacra II–IV 21–24, their paradactyli 8–11, claws 11–14; claw I 8–10). On tarsi II–IV, length of apical setae ad -1 and pd -1 10–12; among subapical setae, av -1, pv -1 (9–11) slightly shorter than al -1, pl -1 (13–14) ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ).
New description. Deutonymph. Idiosomal dorsum ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–6 , 31 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Dorsal shield 392–408 x 228–332, with lateral incisions behind setae s 6, ornamentation similar to that of female ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–6 , 31 View FIGURES 31–38 ), with prominent openings of glands gdz 6, gdZ 3, gdZ 4; podonotal region with 18 pairs of setae, opisthonotal region with 14 pairs of setae; setae j 1 (9–11) and z 1 (6–9) shortest, setae j 5, j 6, z 5, z 6, J 1–5 14–22 long, other setae longer, up to 42–48 (Z 3–5, S 3–5). Setae s 1, s 2, r 2–5 (14–19) and R 1, R 2 (17–20) inserted on soft cuticle.
Idiosomal venter ( Figs 37, 38 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Tritosternum base 18–20 x 11–12; laciniae 74 long, with sparse long barbs in free part and shorter barbs (not spicules as in adults) in fused area ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Sternal shield narrow, with acuminate posterior margin, weakly sclerotised ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 31–38 ), 188–192 long, its width at midlevel of coxae II 44, width at level of middle angles 88–100; shield bearing setae st 1–3 (18–19), st 4 (13–14) and lyrifissures iv 1–3. Setae st 5 (17), paragenital poroids iv 5 and sometimes asymmetrically poroids iv 3 on soft cuticle. Exopodal platelets not developed, openings of glands gvb 1 on soft cuticle, gvb 2 not visible. Anal shield transversely oval (60–64 x 114–118), well formed, coarsely punctate, with narrow (8) cribrum and circumanal setae 17–22 long. Opisthogastric region with 10 pairs of setae (JV 1–5, ZV 1–5) and three pairs of lyrifissures; seta ZV 1 (10–15) shortest, JV 5 (22–25) longest; metapodal platelets narrow (21–29 x 6–7); a pair of transversal bacilliform platelets developed between setae JV 1 and ZV 1 ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Peritrematal shield reduced, peritreme long and narrow (232–264 x 6), almost extending to seta z 1, with smooth margins ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31–38 ).
Gnathosoma ( Figs 32, 35 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Gnathosomal structures in general as in adults. Tectum 14–16 wide with middle process 14–17 long ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31–38 ). Subcapitulum 70–76 x 64–66; deutosternum widening posteriorly from 12 to 16; hp 1 36–40, hp 2 14–17, hp 3 30–36, pc 17–20; corniculus 20–22 x 10–11; chelicera without basal segment 120–136 long, similar to female ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 31–38 ); basal segment length 16–18; movable digit 28–34, chelaseta 8 long. Palp 108–114 long, trochanter with internal seta 26–32 and external seta 10–11; genual al -1 and femoral al 11–12, genual al -2 16–17, tarsal apical macroseta 17–18.
Legs. Length of legs I–IV 264–280, 256–276, 236–252, 288–312, respectively; length of tarsus I 62–68, tarsus IV 94–100. Chaetotaxy as in adults; on tarsi II–IV apical setae (d -1) 9 long, subapical (v -1) 10–11 shorter than (l -1) 13–15, dorso-proximal setae (d -2) curved, long as in adults; legs II–IV with ambulacra 20–22, paradactyli 7–10, claws 13–14 long; claw of leg I small (8–9).
Variability. The species is rather stable morphologically; the dorsal ornamentation and gnathotectum structure are especially constant. Variability concerns mainly the form of anal ( Figs 11, 15 View FIGURES 11–16 ) and ventrianal ( Figs 17, 22 View FIGURES 17–23 ) shields, level of reticulation of sternal/sternitigenital shield (sometimes reticulation is full but hardly visible), length of seta JV 5, and width of deutosternum and denticulation of its rows ( Figs 27, 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Among females, vestigial gland gv 1 may be present or not ( Figs 11, 12 View FIGURES 11–16 ), setae st 5 are rarely symmetrically or asymmetrically on the epigynal shield margins, minimal and maximal lengths of all legs vary 1.3–1.4 times, and those of tarsi I and IV vary up to 1.5–1.6 times. The only two females from Banff National Park, Alberta ( Canada) have six setae in Z series symmetrically, with the additional Zx seta located between Z 1 and Z 2 ( Fig. 7a View FIGURES 7–10 ). This additional pair could be interpreted as an atavistic presence of setae S 2, whose general absence is regarded as an apomorphy of the subfamily Arctoseiinae ( Lindquist & Evans, 1965) . Whether this setal pair is an addition at the protonymphal instar, typical of S 2 ontogeny, would be a test.
Remarks. In the first description of Iphidonopsis sculptus ( Gwiazdowicz, 2004) some inaccuracies are evident. Thus, adults of this species possess 36 pairs of setae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ) on the dorsal shield (not 35 pairs, s 3 was overlooked); the dorsal shield is not really extended down onto the ventral surface (p. 154–156 in Gwiazdowicz, 2004), only onto the lateral areas; in the female, the tritosternum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11–16 ) is of different structure (not as on Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–6 , p. 154); in adults, the gnathotectum ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 7–10 , 19, 20 View FIGURES 17–23 ) has the middle projection usually longer than lateral the ones (not of the same length), and split (not obtuse) apically; in the male, dorsal marginal seta R 1 is present on soft cuticle.
Distribution. A Holarctic species. All records of Iphidonopsis sculptus are within the Temperate Zone of the Northern Hemisphere, in natural biomes of taiga and mixed forests ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ).
Ecology. Found in different bracket fungi ( Fomitopsis pinicola , Trametes hirsuta ), under bark of dead spruce, in mixed or coniferous forest litter, and once on the Nearctic bark beetle, Dryocoetes affaber (Mann.) ( Coleoptera : Curculionidae : Scolytinae ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Arctoseiinae |
Tribe |
Maxiniini |
Genus |
Iphidonopsis sculptus Gwiazdowicz, 2004
Makarova, Olga L., Marchenko, Irina I. & Lindquist, Evert E. 2021 |
Iphidonopsis sculptus
Gwiazdowicz, D. J. 2004: 155 |