Centroscymnus coelolepis Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4947.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F3B4794-65CF-4691-A330-78A423F2606F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4614628 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039287A1-9577-FF90-CFF7-5A9BFDE823A7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Centroscymnus coelolepis Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864 |
status |
|
Centroscymnus coelolepis Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864 View in CoL View at ENA
Portuguese Shark
Centroscymnus coelolepis Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864: 263 View in CoL , fig. 4. Holotype: Museu Bocage , Lisbon, MB T113 , destroyed in fire. Type locality: off Portugal, northeastern Atlantic.
Local synonymy:? Centroscymnus fuscus: Gilchrist & von Bonde, 1924: 2 View in CoL (off St. Helena Bay, South Africa, SE Atlantic); Barnard, 1925: 51; Smith, 1949a: 58; Smith, 1965: 58. Centrophorus squamosus: Hulley, 1971: 267 View in CoL , fig. 1; Bass et al., 1976: 28 (in part, for synonymy of C. fuscus View in CoL with this species). Centroscymnus coelolepis: Compagno, 1984a: 55 View in CoL , fig.; Compagno et al., 1989: 32, pl.; Compagno et al., 1991: 56; Ebert et al., 1992: 603; Compagno, 1999: 115; Compagno et al., 2005: 112, fig., pl. 10; Ebert, 2013: 90, fig. 127; Ebert et al., 2013 a: 151, fig., pl. 13; Ebert & Mostada, 2013: 35, fig.; Ebert, 2015: 87, fig. 104; Ebert & Mostada, 2015: 31, fig.; Ebert & van Hees, 2015: 144; White et al., 2015: 214; Weigmann et al., 2016b: 642; Compagno, 2016: 1189; Weigmann, 2016: 899.
South Africa voucher material: SAIAB 25727, SAIAB 26272, SAIAB 26273, SAIAB 26417, SAIAB 27601.
South Africa distribution: Common off the west coast from the Orange River (NC) to off Cape Agulhas (WC), but also extending to the EC. It has not been found off KZN, but likely occurs there since it has been caught off southern Mozambique and is common on the Walters Shoal ( Weigmann et al., 2016).
Remarks: Centroscymnus fuscus was described from a specimen taken off St. Helena Bay and was recognized as a valid species until Hulley (1971) and Bass et al. (1976) synonymized it with Centrophorus squamosus . However, details of the original description by Gilchrist and von Bonde (1924) suggest that C. fuscus may be a synonym of C. coelolepis rather than C. squamosus . Centroscymnus coelolepis is common in the area off St. Helena Bay where the type specimen was caught, while C. squamosus is relatively uncommon in that area. Unfortunately, C. fuscus was never illustrated and the holotype is lost.
Conservation status: NT (2020).
SAIAB |
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Centroscymnus coelolepis Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864
Ebert, David A., Wintner, Sabine P. & Kyne, Peter M. 2021 |
Centroscymnus coelolepis
Barbosa du Bocage, J. V. & de Brito Capello, F. 1864: 263 |