Carcharhinus, Blainville, 1816
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a5 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:697FC553-E37B-4EF9-97A4-950E4DEE246C |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4605829 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03923C45-FF8B-FF82-3171-FC2BFAF014FE |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Carcharhinus |
| status |
|
Carcharhinus View in CoL View at ENA sp.
MATERIAL
A dozen isolated teeth, figured material includes FSAC Bouj-345, 346 and 347 .
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS
Some rare medium-sized sharks ( Fig. 3 View FIG G-I) are provisionally attributed to Carcharhinus sp. The upper tooth ( Fig. 4G View FIG ) reminds those of Negaprion sp. (unserrated cutting edges, main cusp separated from heels by notches) associated with erect and gracile lower teeth ( Fig. 4H, I View FIG ) usually observed in Carcharhinus , and especially in Priabonian species C. frequens (Dames, 1883) . Assignement of middle Eocene carcharhinid teeth to genera Carcharhinus or Negaprion Whitley, 1940 remains debatable and uncertain (see also Sweydan et al. 2019 for discussion) but its attribution to Carcharhinus seemly more appropriate in regard to the dignathic heterodonty. Underwood et al. (2011) only reported a “ Carcharhinidae nov.gen. ” (sic) with smooth cutting edges in the middle Eocene MI, which is easily distinguishable from our material. No other mediumsized carcharhinid was collected within the studied area, particularly no representative of the “bull-shark” group among the Requiem sharks (see Adnet et al. 2007) that displays upper teeth with a modern morphology (e.g., serrated cutting edges). However, such representative was possibly reported in MI by Underwood et al. (2011: Carcharhinus sp. 1) but the rare specimens are often poorly preserved and were provisionally referred to taxa only well-identified in Priabonian levels. Underwood & Gunter (2012) illustrated a large and unique upper tooth probably representing one of the oldest evidences of “Bullshark” from Jamaica ( Underwood & Gunter 2012: fig. 2); postulated to have been from the Yellow Limestone Group exposed at Broomwell and dated as middle Eocene. However, the age of this unique evidence in still uncertain and no other middle Eocene record was verified. Uncertainty about the age of Carcharhinus underwoodi Samonds, Andrianavalona, Wallett, Zalmout & Ward, 2019 , the other oldest representative of “Bull-shark” group, is quite similar; being currently reported from middle to late Eocene of Madagascar. The lack of large modern Carcharhinus species in Boujdour area seems to indicate an early Bartonian age of the deposits, at least their absence is paleoenvironmentally controlled.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.