Eutittha insulana Thorell, 1878
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1781950 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85C6DF25-BB22-42D7-AB72-35BD1AAD1507 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5029777 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0391E26C-D707-575E-D759-FB1432512376 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Eutittha insulana Thorell, 1878 |
status |
comb. nov. |
Eutittha insulana Thorell, 1878 View in CoL , comb. nov. Figs 1a–c View Figure 1 , 2b View Figure 2
Eutittha insulana Thorell, 1878, p. 179 View in CoL (description of lectotype ♀ and paralectotype juvenile ♀ (both designated here) from INDONESIA: Maluku Islands: Ambon Island GoogleMaps (03°38 ʹ 17 ″ S, 128°07 ʹ 02 ″ E); O. Beccari leg. 1872–1877). Simon 1897, p. 87 (formal transfer to Cheiracanthium , here rejected.)
Comments
Eutittha insulana is the type of the genus. In the taxonomic remarks for ‘ Cheiracanthium insulanum ’, Deeleman-Reinhold (2001, p. 231) noted that ‘the specimens from West Thailand agree fully with those from the Moluccas [= Maluku Islands – type locality of E. insulana ], and appear to be conspecific’. Our study of the syntypes of E. insulana (deposited in MCSNG) revealed that this statement is erroneous. The female lectotype of E. insulana significantly differs from the females described by Deeleman-Reinhold under C. insu /anum (see comments on C. adjacensoides Song, Chen & Hou, 1990 for details). Thus, currently, this species is reliably known only by one female and one immature female, originally described from Ambon Island, Indonesia ( Thorell 1878).
The female of E. insulana is very close to that of E. marplesi , described from New Guinea, by the structure of the epigyne. Both species are characterised by epigyne with transverse atrium and two ventrally visible loops of copulatory ducts ( Figures 1 View Figure 1 (b)). However, E. insulana is 2 times smaller than E. marplesi (but carapace of E. insulana is 1.6 times shorter than that of E. marplesi ) and appears to have a different colour: carapace and chelicerae appear to be solid yellowish brown ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 (a); dark yellow or brick after Thorell (1878)) in E. insulana , while carapace is two-toned in E. marplesi : the thoracic part of carapace yellow, the cephalic part and chelicerae orange ( Chrysanthus 1967).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eutittha insulana Thorell, 1878
Esyunin, Sergei L. & Zamani, Alireza 2020 |
Eutittha insulana
Simon E 1897: 87 |
Thorell T 1878: 179 |