Fucus vesiculosus, L.

Preston, Roxana, Seppä, Perttu, SchagerstrÖm, Ellen & Blomster, Jaanika, 2022, Phylogeographic patterns in attached and free-living marine macroalga Fucus vesiculosus (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae) in the Baltic Sea, Botanica Marina (Warsaw, Poland) 65 (6), pp. 419-432 : 428-429

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2022-0016

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11519676

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0391BA0C-FF85-F12A-C172-C51CFD35FBD4

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Fucus vesiculosus
status

 

4.3 Colonisation and demographic history of F. vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea

The distribution of mitochondrial haplotypes in the Baltic Sea and the Atlantic Ocean suggests that a single haplotype colonised the Baltic from the Atlantic, and became increasingly geographically and reproductively isolated from the parental populations. Current unique mitochondrial diversity in the Baltic Sea compared to the founding North Atlantic populations can then be explained by novel mutations, and subsequent directional selection and genetic drift. The findings of a single mtDNA PR-IGS haplotype corresponding with our putative ancestral haplotype along the Scandinavian coastline ( Coyer et al. 2011a) as well as the analogous demographic characteristics of another recently colonized F. vesiculosus population in North America ( Muhlin and Brawley 2009) supports this assumption. Hence, the observed level of genetic variation within the Baltic Sea appears a result of recent divergence, rather than post-colonisation reduction of variation within the Baltic Sea population.

Despite the well-documented population declines and subsequent recovery of attached F. vesiculosus within the Baltic Sea, the data showed no solid indications of population bottlenecks or recent population expansion. Recovery is often localised, for example within the S and SW Finnish archipelagos, particularly around the Hanko peninsula ( Kangas and Niemi 1985; Rinne and Salovius-Laurén 2020; von Wachenfeldt et al. 1986) and our sampling sites at Seili ( Rönnberg et al. 1985). However, many other sites are yet to recover ( Rinne and Salovius-Laurén 2020; Snickars et al. 2014; Vahteri and Vuorinen 2016). It is therefore possible that declines and recovery may not have been extreme enough, having only a limited effect on the genetic diversity, and thus the bottleneck signal could not be detected. Furthermore, the limited genetic variation among our samples effectively homogenises the population.

Mitochondrial barcode sequencing lacks the resolution to adequately describe the evolutionary dynamics or recent demographic changes of Fucus spp. in the young, postglacial Baltic Sea. However, the markers accurately describe the colonisation of a single haplotype from the Atlantic, and gives an indication of post-colonisation divergence within the sea itself.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Sven Dahlke and Irmgard Blindow (University of Greifswald, Germany) for obtaining samples from the Biological Station Hiddensee and Jouni Leinikki for providing samples from Olkiluoto. We also wish to thank the staff at the Molecular Ecology and Systematics ( MES) laboratory, University of Helsinki, for their help with the DNA sequencing.

Author contributions: Preston, R: conceptualization (lead), data curation (lead), formal analysis (lead), funding acquisition (lead), investigation (lead), methodology (lead), project administration (lead), resources (equal), supervision (equal), visualization (lead), writing – original draft (lead). Seppä, P: formal analysis (supporting), writing – review & editing (equal). Schagerström, E: conceptuali-zation (supporting), resources (equal), writing – review & editing (equal). Blomster, J: conceptualization (supporting), supervision (equal), writing – review & editing (equal).

Research funding: Funding for this project was provided through grants from the Walter and Andrée de Nottbeck Foundation and the Onni Talas Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability: DNA sequences: Genbank accessions MZ711443 - MZ711447 (IGS) and MZ779027 - MZ779028 (23S). Figshare: full concatenated and separate IGS and 23S datasets available at DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.17049041.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

Kingdom

Chromista

Phylum

Ochrophyta

Class

Phaeophyceae

Order

Fucales

Family

Fucaceae

Genus

Fucus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF