Neognamptodon Belokobylskij, 1999
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4778.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6D747D40-ACB2-473D-B41C-2DA04B10F225 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3848239 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03911A3F-FF87-264C-91A3-F8BEFB13FE5A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neognamptodon Belokobylskij, 1999 |
status |
|
Neognamptodon Belokobylskij, 1999 View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs 48–64 View FIGURE 48 View FIGURES 49–59 View FIGURES 60–64 )
Neognamptodon Belokobylskij, 1999: 167–168 . Type species (by original designation): Neognamptodon suturalis Belokobylskij, 1999 .
Diagnosis. Antenna with 23–26 antennomeres; occipital carina absent laterally ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 49–59 ); pronotum without distinct pronope, only with a transverse crenulated groove ( Figs 57 View FIGURES 49–59 , 64 View FIGURES 60–64 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.20–0.35 × as long as fore wing.
Distribution. Afrotropical ( Madagascar), Australian ( Papua New Guinea), Oriental ( China). The genus is new for the Oriental region and for the fauna of China.
Notes. Gnamptodon novobritannicus Fischer, 1971 , from Bismarck Archipelago does not fit in Gnamptodon Haliday because of the presence of the medio-longitudinal carina of the propodeum, the only slightly oblique vein 3-CU1 of fore wing, the well-developed precoxal sulcus, the strongly converging dorsal carinae of the first tergite and the long ovipositor (longer than half length of metasoma). It is transferred to Neognamptodon Belokobylskij , where it fits much better and N. novobritannicus (Fischer, 1971) becomes a new combination.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Gnamptodontini |