Pseudocryptocoeloma parvum Ward, 1936

Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2023, Review of the pilumnid crab genus Lophoplax Tesch, 1918 from the western Pacific, with descriptions of two new species, and the clarification of the identity of Pseudocryptocoeloma parvus Ward, 1936 (Crustacea: Brachyura), Zootaxa 5244 (5), pp. 428-454 : 447-451

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5244.5.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B55396DA-15DB-4CDF-81FD-78686A0EC3A2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7663764

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039087CD-7E16-733F-47C6-FB53F45DFDC3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudocryptocoeloma parvum Ward, 1936
status

 

Pseudocryptocoeloma parvum Ward, 1936 View in CoL

( Figs. 13–15 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 )

Pseudocryptocoeloma parvus Ward, 1936: 3 View in CoL , pl. 1 figs. 7–9; Davie 2002: 426; Ng 1987: 79, 97; Ng et al. 2008: 144.

Material examined. 1 male (8.7 × 6.2 mm) ( NHM 1937.7.15.20), Thursday Island , Torres Strait, Australia, coll. M. Ward , 1937.

Diagnosis. As for genus.

Description of male. Carapace subquadrate, broader than long; dorsal surface gently convex in anterior half, almost flatter on posterior half; regions poorly defined; surface smooth, without granules or obvious rugosities, frontal and anterolateral margins covered by numerous soft setae that obscures margins, rest of carapace glabrous, appearing polished ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Frontal margin slightly produced, divided into 2 very low lobes, barely separated by very shallow concavity; lateral lobe not discernible ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Anterolateral margin convex; external orbital tooth very low, wide, outer margin 4 times longer than inner margin, separated from first anterolateral tooth by shallow notch; first anterolateral tooth low, wide; second anterolateral tooth low, with outer margin convex ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Posterolateral margin gently concave, surface weakly rugose, converging to almost straight posterior carapace margin ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Suborbital, subhepatic, pterygostomial and sub-branchial regions smooth ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ). Orbit transverse, large; supraorbital margin almost straight, entire; suborbital margin gently sinuous, entire, without tooth on inner angle ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A, B View FIGURE 15 ). Eyes large with short peduncle and large cornea ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A, B View FIGURE 15 ). Antennular peduncle basal article folding transversely ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15B View FIGURE 15 ). Antennal peduncle (basal article) quadrate, immovably fused with epistome but sutures visible; articles 3 and 4 shorter than basal article, flagellum short, not entering orbit; antennule folding transversely ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15B View FIGURE 15 ). Epistome longitudinally wide; posterior margin with wide median triangular lobe with median fissure, separated from lateral part by short fissure; lateral margin almost straight ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15B, C View FIGURE 15 ). Endostome with low oblique ridge on each half.

Third maxilliped relatively short; merus quadrate, anteroexternal angle auriculiform; ischium subrectangular with shallow oblique median sulcus; exopod relatively broad, tip almost reaching distal edge of merus, with long flagellum ( Fig. 15D View FIGURE 15 ).

Chelipeds asymmetrical, relatively short; basis-ischium almost smooth on ventral margin; merus short, unarmed; carpus with low but acute inner distal tooth, dorsal surface smooth ( Figs. 13A, B View FIGURE 13 , 14A–D View FIGURE 14 ); chela enlarged, both chelae similar in structure, outer surface smooth, glabrous, only dorsal margins setose, palm high, fingers shorter than palm, pollex forming gently concave and continuous margin with ventral margin of palm, dactylus meeting pollex at sharp angle, cutting margins of each finger with low, wide teeth ( Figs. 13A, B View FIGURE 13 , 14A–D View FIGURE 14 ).

Ambulatory legs relatively short, stout, without conspicuous teeth or spines; margins covered with similar pubescence on carapace; P3 longest, P5 shortest; merus without cristae on dorsal margin, appearing entire; carpus and propodus smooth; dactylus gently curved along most of length, tip hooked, almost glabrous ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14E View FIGURE 14 ).

Thoracic sternum smooth, weakly setose; sternites 1 and 2 completely fused to form triangular structure; sternite 2 and 3 separated by distinctly sinuous suture; sternites 3 and 4 fused but shallow oblique lateral depression demarcating sternites visible; sternopleonal cavity reaching imaginary line connecting submedian part of coxae of chelipeds; sternite 8 exposed when pleon closed, visible as subquadrate plate ( Figs. 13B View FIGURE 13 , 14F View FIGURE 14 , 15E View FIGURE 15 ).

Pleon triangular, transversely narrow, especially along somites 4–6; all somites and telson free; somite 1 widest, reaching to P5 coxae; somite 2 less than somites 1 and 3; somite 3 wide, reaching condyles of P5 coxae; somites 4 and 5 trapezoidal with gently concave margins; somite 6 rectangular; telson triangular ( Figs. 14F View FIGURE 14 , 15F View FIGURE 15 ).

G1 strongly sinuous, distal part strongly curved, hooked, elongate ( Fig. 15G–J View FIGURE 15 ); G2 short spatuliform ( Fig. 15K View FIGURE 15 ).

Colour in life. Not known.

Remarks. Ward (1936: 4) described this species from 28 males and 26 females from Lindeman Island, Whitsunday Passage, Queensland; with one male with a carapace width of 10.0 mm selected as the holotype. Despite several attempts, we have not been able to examine the types in the Queensland Museum which could not be found during the period of this study because of lockdowns and collection relocation. The present specimen from northeastern Australia, however, agrees very well with the original description and figures and we are confident of its identity.

As the gender of the genus must be neuter (derived from the Greek - coeloma), the species name should be spelled as “ parvum ”.

Habitat. Ward (1936: 4) states that the “species occurs under stones on mud at about half way down the intertidal area.”

Distribution. Known only from northeastern Australia.

NHM

University of Nottingham

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Pilumnidae

Genus

Pseudocryptocoeloma

Loc

Pseudocryptocoeloma parvum Ward, 1936

Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo 2023
2023
Loc

Pseudocryptocoeloma parvus

Ng, P. K. L. & D. Guinot & P. J. F. Davie 2008: 144
Davie, P. J. F. 2002: 426
Ng, P. K. L. 1987: 79
Ward, M. 1936: 3
1936
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF